In Group Female Promiscuity is natural

[Pandora]

You've seen a fat woman, who you think is hot, be sexually aggressive. And then you twisted it around in your tiny head and made a post about it here.

Hot women don't need to be sexually aggressive. Maybe when they are drunk it might happen, but as a general rule hot women don't approach any men because they are getting approached all the time. The most a guy might get is an inviting look. But she pounces on him and offers sex? No hot woman does that to a guy she doesn't know.

Hot women don't need to be sexually aggressive. Rephrase that to " hot women have never been sexually aggressive to me because I am average looking". See i fixed that for you

Bro your experiences are limited to you. Other better looking guys in way different cities have different experiences. Be humble. Btw how old are you? How many nations have you lived in and had sex in? Crickets.....

 

[Velasco]

He might have kissed a couple Australian girls but this dude has never pulled in the US or anywhere else for that matter.

Lol he's not that inexperienced. All he's does is try to portray himself as someone much bigger than he actually is. Ive said to him before that it begins with just being honest with yourself. And then grow from there

 

[Pandora]

Lol he's not that inexperienced. All he's does is try to portray himself as someone much bigger than he actually is. Ive said to him before that it begins with just being honest with yourself. And then grow from there

Bro guys who have had vast experiences with women don't say the following things.

1.) " That doesnt follow hypergamy" if you fucced enough women you will see that hypergamy is a loose guideline to how women act there are other models that women operate on. For example many women intentionally date down because of insecurity issues. They don't feel good enough for a good man. This is a real thing. Or there are women that have sexual experiences with other very beta women. How do you explain this with hypergamy? You have to do enormous mental gymnastics to explain with hypergamy. There are women who fucc dogs and 14 yr old boys. Is that still hypergamy?

2.) " The 50% cheating rate is overinflated". Anyone that has fucc more than 10 attractive women would have encountered a woman that was DEFINITELY cheating on her bf or main guy. Real players are very cynical because they have seen the worst of female behavior. Guys that have real experience will over state how much women cheat.

3.) " Hot women are not sexually aggressive" if you hang around enough very handsome men you will see that this is not true. It's rare but it does happen. Groupies are very sexually aggressive indeed. Hang around division 1 football players and you will see how aggressive hot women can be.

I try to be humble to guys with more experience. Sacramouche literally corrected me and I said " you are right and thank you". This bozo Pan_87 would never allow himself to be corrected. I'm done with this.

 

[Barrister]

And it can (and does) happen much faster than that. Instant makeouts are a thing lol. It's neither a good or bad thing but they do happen. I'll post exactly where I claimed that.

Here:

The Missing Puzzle Piece: The Myth of ASD

I read something a couple of days ago that finally helped me connect the dots on something that's alluded me. My goal is to share to help those who had a vague idea of what I'm about to share. But have never been able to put the pieces together. Here it is...

www.sosuave.net

See the bottom of my post above where I said "here" and then linked the corresponding thread I'm talking about? There you go


When I refer to someone as an Internet alpha male. I'm referring the the stereotypical image that people think of when the word "alpha male" is brought up. There are guys who want to portray them themselves as being this image but do so in a way that is transparent to those who can see through them, that earns them that moniker.

Me I'm just as arrogant as I am in person as I am online. And yes I've mastered cold approach at 28. Having done this for 7 years. but there is more to life than that. Which is where I'm looking to take my talents

You don’t seem arrogant to me at all. More just insecure - hence your constant peacocking on here. But do carry on.

 

[Velasco]

You did post a picture of the fat Indian chick you banged. I posted a meme photo of an obese indian woman in response.

I never posted any pictures of the girls I've banged on here except to former member @Guy69JackBlue through dms. I'd be happy to post them here as well so we can exchange receipts. But you've already explained that you don't want to post your lays because "integrity" or some other bs. Why don't you ask mods to dig up this picture I posted? I have nothing to hide.

You also said the best way to bang a girl is just to walk her back to your apartment without telling her where you're going. Sounds like a good way to catch a criminal case, and horrible advice to be giving men who are trying to learn.

Nope. Ive written a lay report doing just that. I never give advice to someone on something I myself have never field tested. That would be KJ. I can repost it here if you'd like.

Nothing wrong with your tastes in women, it's just a bit weird how you like to dispense advice like an Elder of Game. I'm guessing your advice is useful for guys who want to bang fat indian chicks and eventually end up in prison?

Post receipts. Thanks in advance

 

[Velasco]

He posted it in a receipts thread, or he edited the post on that thread he linked. I wouldn't have sent that meme for no reason.

Zim....come on now brother. You know

 

[Velasco]

I remember the picture of the Indian you posted because it was from a swipe app

I don't use apps. All my lays are from cold approach. Try again. Receipts?

 

[metalwater]

100% ....i always kept it civil but the way that dude talks down to anyone that has a different perspective is crazy. I thought 87 was the year he was born like 1987. But now I'm convinced he is alot younger and less experienced than I thought.

This is the Mature Man's forum. He ain't gonna bs us here. We are dudes that have seen a lot. Humility is the mark of someone that has seen a lot. He has none. He might have kissed a couple Australian girls but this dude has never pulled in the US or anywhere else for that matter. Sit down and learn.

seems like trying to learn aggressive dominance. that's a tactic that will work with women but needs to be practiced to have it natural. maybe he is just working on that strategy and using the forum as the testing ground. the result of that strategy is that women should be turned on (if it's done right it works), and men will be irritated. it's safe to do in the forum, it's riskier to learn it in real life because of the obvious reasons.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

I don't know.... @DEEZEDBRAH seems to have good luck with this method.

Reward favors the bold.

A better play is instructing her what to do. Esculating following compliance. Push pull until you rip each others clothes off and you hump like wild animals.

Compliance = the game!

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Tbh I won't knock anybody posting receipts. More than 99% of YouTube.

Ideally, it's funnier to embed receipts in your avi followed by done humor meme. Then again you run the risk of misc detectives.

 

[Am Shaegar]

I'm convinced Pandora and Velasco have some sort of cuckold fantasy where women are constantly sleeping with other men. They keep using personal anecdotes to support their warped views.

Pandora is already operating on the clown logic that pre-history was some kind of paradise, that living as a hunter gather is the "natural" state of humans, that agriculture/civilisation is somehow "unnatural" despite being the norm for 10.000 years and that between pre-history and today not a single culture really took it's code of morality and laws serious and everyone was ****ing with everyone regardless. So what do you expect? I suspect he was already purpe pilled and then reading the liberal political hack work that is "Sex at Dawn" only reinforced his views.

 

[Pandora]

Pandora is already operating on the clown logic that pre-history was some kind of paradise, that living as a hunter gather is the "natural" state of humans, that agriculture/civilisation is somehow "unnatural" despite being the norm for 10.000 years and that between pre-history and today not a single culture really took it's code of morality and laws serious and everyone was ****ing with everyone regardless. So what do you expect? I suspect he was already purpe pilled and then reading the liberal political hack work that is "Sex at Dawn" only reinforced his views.

Pre history was way better than the mess we have today though that's for sure. We are on anti depressants, male suicide is through the rough. We can't even keep a positive birth rate. Atleast the Native American tribes were able to do that lol.

We have to come on a forum in order to figure out how to deal with our women. These tribes you disparage knew exactly how to deal with their women. But you rather insult than actually consider an alternative view lol.

What I am saying is actually very black pilled. Im saying stop trying to control female sexuality. You cant do it. The more you try the worse it gets. Our pre historic ancestors knew this. Thats why they let the women **** who they wanted ( to a degree) and everything worked out. With only like 150 people in a tribe there was only so many dycks she could suck.

 

[Pandora]

seems like trying to learn aggressive dominance. that's a tactic that will work with women but needs to be practiced to have it natural. maybe he is just working on that strategy and using the forum as the testing ground. the result of that strategy is that women should be turned on (if it's done right it works), and men will be irritated. it's safe to do in the forum, it's riskier to learn it in real life because of the obvious reasons.

Exactly. He is using aggressive dominance. Instead of disagreeing politely, he comes at you like a prick. When we just automatically insult each other we are acting like the very women we criticize. If you don't agree then you don't agree. We are grown men that should be able to entertain controversial topics like gentlemen.

 

[Pandora]

Pandora is already operating on the clown logic that pre-history was some kind of paradise, that living as a hunter gather is the "natural" state of humans, that agriculture/civilisation is somehow "unnatural" despite being the norm for 10.000 years and that between pre-history and today not a single culture really took it's code of morality and laws serious and everyone was ****ing with everyone regardless. So what do you expect? I suspect he was already purpe pilled and then reading the liberal political hack work that is "Sex at Dawn" only reinforced his views.

Pornhub Stats Reveal Women Search for More Hardcore Genres Than You Might Expect

With the increased availability of internet porn, women are becoming just as active on porn sites as men. This isn’t just a guy problem.

fightthenewdrug.org

Btw gangbang and double penetration are one of the most popular porn categories for women thus proving my point to a certain degree. This is what they fantasize about. I am not saying that EVERY woman will do this. I am saying that this may be an echo of our evolutionary heritage where women were shared.

I am also saying this based on these searches, this is not a monogamous creature. Lets step pretending that they are monogamous. They secretly fantasize about other men a lot more than you think. This is why they initiate divorce at an 80% rate. But go ahead and keep complaining and crying about thots lol. You are the type of guy that will date a girl and then cry when you found out she had a gangbang in college. Meanwhile I will be like " told ya so".

 

[Zimbabwe]

This is how i imagine @Pandora right now

 

[TitusRamsies]

A woman will always cheat with the right man under the right circumstances.

 

[firstbornunicorn]

The whole point of my post is that we have to accept that women want to be sexually free. They never wanted monogamy. WE DID. Before civilization we let them be free.

When we marry them and they divorce us in 7 yrs...that is natural to them. This is not a bug. It's a feature. They were made to hop on dyck after dyck. They were designed for genetic and sexually diversity. We don't want to believe it but it's true.

Who cares about their pair bonding abiltiy. That only matters in civilization where pair bonding matters because of property. Well guess what, we didn't evolve from civilization. This civilization thing is very new to us. Our nature is short term coupling and moving on to the next.

Men would save themselves alot of pain if they just accepted this. No need to be angry when she cheats on you. She was designed to cheat just like we were designed to cheat. Don't be jealous. Just move on to the next female. That's my point essentially.

Well yeah, but succumbing to out animalistic desires doesn't a stable society make. We were also made to kill each other & rape. But somehow only women's nature is ok? It's either both or nothing.

 

[Am Shaegar]

Pre history was way better than the mess we have today though that's for sure.

Wherever or not that is true the problem is your version of pre-history is a liberal fantasy and has nothing to do with reality, it's easily disproven and we don't even have to go into pre-history to do so.

What I am saying is actually very black pilled. Im saying stop trying to control female sexuality. You cant do it. The more you try the worse it gets. Our pre historic ancestors knew this. Thats why they let the women **** who they wanted ( to a degree) and everything worked out. With only like 150 people in a tribe there was only so many dycks she could suck.

Another problem is that your entire premise is ****ed and you don't have deeper thoughts about it. Nobody ever outside the most bluepilled white knight chums thinks of women that way. Even the bible and sources from polytheistic religions in antiquity call women out as being untrustworthy sluts. You are not delivering new information or bringing revelation down the mountain. The point has never been if women are biological monogamous creatures, the questions is if you let women get away with being sluts, let them walk over you and taking your resources, because if you do, you are simply an idiot thats being cuckolded. Even our current era proves you wrong, because our current world is **** not because we are caging women in at the moment, but because we have allowed them to run amok. The current civilisation you claim to be so displeased with is the product of allowing women to do as they please, just the way you advocate it. The anti depressants, male suicide, low birth rates and a whole slew of other problems are caused by female egotism at the cost of men and not because of jelousy or some other bull****. And all your great advise boils down to is being the dog that sits in a house on fire and thinks this is fine.

 

[Pandora]

Well yeah, but succumbing to out animalistic desires doesn't a stable society make. We were also made to kill each other & rape. But somehow only women's nature is ok? It's either both or nothing.

But we weren't made to kill and rape. That's what social Darwinism has brainwashed into the American population. Humans largely cooperate. Fighting is the exception. Lethal fighting usually happens when resources are scare and social hierarchy ( govt) is involved. Yes it occasionally happens but we cooperate way more than we fight. Again, when was the last time you got into a fight. How many fights do you see on a pick up basketball court. Even in the hood it's relatively rare.

Read the account of the explorers when they found these so called Savages. They remarked on how relatively peaceful they were.

It's like that scene in Fight Club. They had to go pick a fight with a stranger and it was very difficult.

 

[metalwater]

The whole point of my post is that we have to accept that women want to be sexually free. They never wanted monogamy. WE DID. Before civilization we let them be free.

When we marry them and they divorce us in 7 yrs...that is natural to them. This is not a bug. It's a feature. They were made to hop on dyck after dyck. They were designed for genetic and sexually diversity. We don't want to believe it but it's true.

Who cares about their pair bonding abiltiy. That only matters in civilization where pair bonding matters because of property. Well guess what, we didn't evolve from civilization. This civilization thing is very new to us. Our nature is short term coupling and moving on to the next.

Men would save themselves alot of pain if they just accepted this. No need to be angry when she cheats on you. She was designed to cheat just like we were designed to cheat. Don't be jealous. Just move on to the next female. That's my point essentially.

thinking about this..

a question from the devil's advocate.

let's assume this is true... why would the man need to move to the next female. AWALT, the next one is not better than the last one or the current one. they all going to be the same way. so why do we next a female that is simply being natural and in an expected way? then we simply get another one that has the same problem, AWALT.

insanity; expecting different results from the same actions.