escorts vs civvies

[AmsterdamAssassin]

USE THAT ON BOARDS DEDICATED TO THE PURSUIT OF PROSTITUTES.

If you can just rent them, you don't need to pursue.

 

[GoodMan32]

Good enough. Will look at thread again on Friday. On full time job thing.

Since some of the users on here really don't like the term civvie, I'm going to say "non-escort."

Here's yet another explanation for the 6 year gap (of non-escort lays): I find it way too awkward to cross paths with a girl I got rejected by (I speak from experience. Been there, done that, never again). This means if I'm going to make a move on a non-escort, she has to either:

1. Be a woman I'm highly unlikely to run into ever again post-rejection.

Or

2. I have to be 100% sure she's into me before I make my move.

 

[Murk]

People like @Murk and @Gamisch are Black, or have Black in them, and have managed to deal with "no black" escorts.

No I haven’t lol. If they have an NBA policy (no blacks allowed) then despite me looking Middle Eastern or Mexican… I just don’t bother. You need to find someone who will be comfortable and enjoy it, no point paying to convince a chick to feel relaxed.

 

[RickTheToad]

I think a guy would have to spring for a more expensive car to maximize his sex options.

I drive a 10 year old Chevy; never had an issue.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I don't even have a car.

 

[GoodMan32]

I don't own a car either.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I do own a motorcycle though. And several bicycles.

 

[BoomToTheMoonAlice]

You underestimate how deep the racism problem is in North America then. It's not as free and liberal place like Amsterdam in that way.

For the record, I did reference @Murk and @Gamisch but THEY are not dealing with North American prostitutes. They are dealing with European prostitutes. I don't think Europe, or Amsterdam as a whole has the same type of social issues like America or Canada (ie especially Quebec, Canada).




How would you know how things work in North America?



Right, and if I were in Amsterdam and was under that climate then I'd probably agree with you. Amsterdam is a more progressive and inclusive country as a whole than North America is. (To be fair, there are also a number of non-racist normal escorts here who only care about money rather than the race of the client, so I'm not saying ALL escorts are like that, but definitely a significant number that would make someone who is Black, or have Black-in-their-blood, feel uncomfortable when searching out for an escort, and may end up dealing with someone other than the one they really want because they are not racist, which puts the experience too much like you are looking for a date with someone who likes your race enough to deal with you rather than really searching for an escort as a customer. That should not be on a mind-set of a customer or it adds a level of trauma being "othered" even in that process). Thus, the experience of using prostitutes vastly differes from the country you are using them in.

If I went to Thialand, the Domenican Republics or Mexico/Columbia then using their prostitutes would be different because the whole country and culture is different. Same thing with India. Each country has their own independent unique culture of how these things operate.



If you see the type of guys who use prostitutes, then that would kill the appetite of wanting to use them, that's for sure.



I doubt Amsterdam has any local incel population.

Bro you're in Toronto, its a literal sh1t hol3 there. Guelph is probably more your speed, we're getting inundated with East Indians.

 

[corrector]

Since some of the users on here really don't like the term civvie, I'm going to say "non-escort."

Here's yet another explanation for the 6 year gap (of non-escort lays): I find it way too awkward to cross paths with a girl I got rejected by (I speak from experience. Been there, done that, never again). This means if I'm going to make a move on a non-escort, she has to either:

1. Be a woman I'm highly unlikely to run into ever again post-rejection.

Or

2. I have to be 100% sure she's into me before I make my move.

The same chad users (who never have to use an escort by the way) who are bothered by the term is the same people who dont agree with this topic in the first place. You want to pander to them? They look down on you for using escorts period. I will start using the term non-chad rather than normies and sub-5s.

 

[Dr.Suave]

Since some of the users on here really don't like the term civvie

Who cares what they like or dont. Its not like you are doing something against forum rules (as far as I know).

Just ignore them and hold your f0cking ground. But where they might have a point is that threads like this should be in the "Anything Else" Forum.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

Since some of the users on here really don't like the term civvie, I'm going to say "non-escort."

I don't like 'escort' either. Just 'prostitutes' will do just fine.

 

[Hamurabimbi]

Since some of the users on here really don't like the term civvie, I'm going to say "non-escort."

Here's yet another explanation for the 6 year gap (of non-escort lays): I find it way too awkward to cross paths with a girl I got rejected by (I speak from experience. Been there, done that, never again). This means if I'm going to make a move on a non-escort, she has to either:

1. Be a woman I'm highly unlikely to run into ever again post-rejection.

Or

2. I have to be 100% sure she's into me before I make my move.

Women are by default, non-escorts. There is no need to use that term. Likewise, I don’t need to identify myself as a Non-giggalo.

 

[Hamurabimbi]

But where they might have a point is that threads like this should be in the "Anything Else" Forum.

This.

 

[corrector]

Escorts are nasty. I have never hired one and I never will. Arent you guys that hire them concerned about how many men that escort has been with? Gross!!! I will say though that I think it should be legal in all countries for a man to hire an escort if he wants one.

What you are talking about could be post-nut clarity after using one, especially if another "client" is walking in the door as you are walking out. Things like that can give you a nervous break-down, especially if you were into it and had a hot session. It's an industrial-level of guys she's been with.

The only thing I can think of is if you do softcore things (ie dancing, cuddling, holding, or mutual fapping, etc..) then it shouldn't be that bad.
I have not even been in the same room or breathing space with an escort since Dec 5, 2014. The nervious breakdown was just too bad to try it again. However, I might at some point entertain the idea of being in the same room and leave just to see if that would trigger anything else (ie like don't touch her or do anything, but just see if some "spirit" would attack a day or two later).

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I have not even been in the same room or breathing space with an escort prostitute since Dec 5, 2014. The nervious breakdown was just too bad to try it again.

You don't know. Unless you believe prostitutes are succubi who can sustain themselves on energy, they probably share the same breathing space as you do when you go shopping for groceries or take public transport or go to the gym or visit a bookstore.

However, I might at some point entertain the idea of being in the same room and leave just to see if that would trigger anything else (ie like don't touch her or do anything, but just see if some "spirit" would attack a day or two later).

Oh, please keep us informed on your riveting future prostitute adventures full of black magic and spirit attacks.

 

[pipeman84]

Escorts are nasty. I have never hired one and I never will. Arent you guys that hire them concerned about how many men that escort has been with? Gross!!!

Are you concerned with how many clients have driven in the taxi/Uber you just ordered?
What's gross is to pay the 2023 list price for a brand new Mercedes S500 and receive an used 2001 Hyundai ... that's a metaphor for marrying a woman with notch count. Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez engagement is gross.

 

[corrector]

You don't know. Unless you believe prostitutes are succubi who can sustain themselves on energy, they probably share the same breathing space as you do when you go shopping for groceries or take public transport or go to the gym or visit a bookstore.

Even spiritual concept issues have their own rules and laws to follow. In a public space, nobody has any power over me. If I go inside a room that an escort works, and sees other men, then that room as a different energy than a public space, and especially if I give money and go into that room myself, then I put myself under the power of whatever spiritual forces are also inside of that room that are running the show behind the scenes. These spirits have other spirits that they report to and have an agenda in order to spread evil and corruption among men. When I enter THEIR space, I become like a spy or someone up to no good to them. They will say, "Look, there is a Christian partaking in this thing, what is he up to?" If I actually engage the prostitute then, it might be like "Lets have some fun and torment this Christian. Lets go and get him.".

However, they are quite harmless when you are not under their control because they simply can't have any rights over you.

Oh, please keep us informed on your riveting future prostitute adventures full of black magic and spirit attacks.

Why are you behaving so childish? What is wrong with you?

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

Folks, take your meds. You clearly need them.

 

[GoodMan32]

Women are by default, non-escorts. There is no need to use that term. Likewise, I don’t need to identify myself as a Non-giggalo.

As corrector pointed out, referring to non-escort women as simply "women," ends up denying the womanhood of escorts. An escort is a woman too.

 

[GoodMan32]

Escorts are nasty. I have never hired one and I never will. Arent you guys that hire them concerned about how many men that escort has been with? Gross!!! I will say though that I think it should be legal in all countries for a man to hire an escort if he wants one.

Am I thrilled to think about all the men they've been with during a lifetime? No.

Am I thrilled to think, even the same day I'm with her, she's probably been with a few other men? No.

However, with how sparingly I'm able to secure a non-escort lay (and with how much work I have to put in to secure a non-escort lay), I've come to the conclusion that it makes more sense for me to utilize escorts (Which isn't to say I'm totally uninterested in non-escorts).

As for legality, I prefer having prostitution outlawed. Keeps the prices down (and with a little common sense, you can easily avoid stings)