Considering, aside from explosives, Americans can possess all the calibers those warring cartels in Mexico possess. Not just 9mm. You're reductive reasoning is what's fantasy.
Who cares about calibres?
when you’ve seen your neighbours skinned alive and had their hearts cut out, I don’t think you’re going to be going for a last stand against a paramilitary organisation.
Unless you and Bob down the road watch a load, and I mean a load, of YouTube videos on self defence and get your tactical gear on.
All 2A seems to have achieved in the US is a murder rate 5X the rest of the developed world, a gun homicide rate approximately 35x the rest of the developed world, whilst having the largest per capita prison population, among the longest sentencing and demonstrably the most powerful and forceful police force and state agencies of all of the Western Hemisphere.
its failed in both terms of protecting the individual from tyranny and protecting individuals from violence. Yet, the answer seems to be “we need MORE guns”
Like the religious, people will defend beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence . I’ve had this debate multiple times, and I’ve never had anything except anecdotal evidence, and selective evidence. Or just general nonsense like “yeah but what about all the knife crime and terrorism”, again, statistically none of this bears out. Or “London has a higher rate of violence than New York for 3 years out of 10”Cherry picking.
I do believe Americans need to keep their guns because disarming is impossible. However, you have to be a special kind of stupid to believe it’s a better system than the one the rest of the demonstrably more peaceful developed world have adopted.