You are starting out from the wrong premise. Women want a man that they respect, who understands them, turns them on, and accepts them for who they are. Being a protector/provider is secondary to that.
Street smarts but not book smarts.
I agree with you totally, and I understand the concept. But what I'm saying is that I personally haven't experienced women holding out on me like this to impress me. Maybe it's because authenticity is a major part of my screening process.
Possible, although that's probably a function of my age as much as anything else. I did my running around when I was younger, and it was fine, but at some point I got bored with it. I don't even consider myself "in the game" at this point in time. I just keep a woman because I like to have one around.
You keep repeating that, but honestly it's not saying very much. Most PUA theories have a contradictory counterpart. For instance, many gurus promote touching a girl immediately and often. Others say that you should wait until they touch you first. Some say compliment, some say don't compliment. Some say be direct, some say fly in under the radar. You can take almost any approach or behavior and claim that it comes from game theory.
There is definitely a large amount of skill required, depending on what style the guy wrestles. But athletic or not, they aren't necessarily good FIGHTERS, as CM Punk's debut in the UFC demonstrated. Guys like Brock Lesnar (UFC Champion), Kurt Angle (won an Olympic gold medal with a broken frigging neck), and Jack Swagger (record setting All American) can obviously walk the walk though.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
The women explain it as they wouldn't "fall" for the Chad's so they were OK to do a one night with because she knew they weren't loyal. This is the explanation and example 2 is good for a long term relationship, but they have to wait and see how it goes.
Yes, I've heard that. But women do try to butter up the beta guy by downplaying the ONS with Chad.
Well, she does believe the beta is better for relationships and having someone to care about her, cause she knows Chad won't... They just are always up for the challenge of trying to tame or change a chad and make him "nicer".
Absolutely. Plus, the ONS was far from "meaningless" when she was bragging to her gf about it over drinks. It only became "meaningless" when the beta brought up the topic lol.
Females do brag about the untameable "game" that they boned. They might know he's "slutty" or could give her something, but those guys are on all those ladies mouths. It's whose being talked about.
Spot on bro!
My guess is that you project sexuality and a positive vibe.You definitely do not sound like an orbiter from your posts. Essentially, when you behave like a man, women will get the pvssy tingles around you even if you play the boyfriend material game. It just happens to not be my cup of tea, but to each their own. I do believe it increases women's expectations from you and delays sex, in general.
If a woman ever said that, respond by saying you only believe in casual and open relationships.
it's only "meaningless" if the company she's in cares about if she's being slvtty or not. if she doesn't care what you think or doesn't think you're going to judge, then it's not going to be "meaningless"
Understood. I was just being sarcastic.
i was agreeing with you anyway lol
