SamTheHobit
Master Don Juan
This quote will become famous one day.Atom Smasher said:Fortunate is the man who finds one of the 3% who exhibit a tolerable degree of character.
This quote will become famous one day.Atom Smasher said:Fortunate is the man who finds one of the 3% who exhibit a tolerable degree of character.
Women absolutely seek power in relationships. Once they're done with the c0ck carousel they need a secure relationship with a man who will never leave. They can only get this from a beta fag who will willingly submit. But beta fags have options too (believe it or not). This is were the manipulation, testing and mind games comes in. They would scare the beta away if they were totally upfront with him from the start.TheException said:Feel free to go back into that thread and quote me on it pal. Context is everything. I stated that the "day to day" things women do such as sh1t tests, withholding sex, LMR, b1tch shields, etc are NOT manipulative. You disagreed. You believe women seek "power". You take that simple point to the extreme to say "Look ah ha....The exception thinks women are NEVER manipulative". Do I think women have the capability to be manipulative? Sure, everybody does. Im sure women have gotten pregnant on "accident" to get a nice rich guy. Thats not what Im talking about. Chump guys come here to sosuave and complain about the "day to day" sh1t and complain about it. You brush their face and tell them "its ok, women are just trying to manipulate you and make you a slave. Do what I do and never get close to one."
This is actually true. Pandering beta faggots let women's anti-social behavior go unchecked. Without consequences.. the behavior gets worse. Like a bratty child.False. Marriage fails because men turn into vag1nas and their wives no longer find them attractive. You think women really give a sh1t about your loyalty? No they care about if you turn them on or not. The "loyal beta fags" bit....is SPOT ON AND THE REAL REASON for the failure of marriages.
For instance....being a beta male = an obese woman. Those are the two things that repulse the respective gender. Today's marriage situation is equated to if the mass majority of women WERE OBESE....do you think us men wouldnt treat them different than we would have if they were hott? Let that sink in...
Marriage is a fools domain for a man. I don't care who does it. Its beta."Loyal beta fag men" never WERE respected. The number of them....have simply increased. I am in a relationship with a woman currently....and guess what? No one is taking advantage of me. I am red pill and am fully aware of society "forcing me" into the beta fag role....problem is....I wont go. Its up to us, as men to change the society. Im sure you are aware of Rollo Tomassi.....hes married. Certainly you wouldnt call one of the best bloggers a beta fag simply because he is married?
Agree with this. I've never understood why posters on this forum make such a big deal about this "red pill" as if they've turned themselves into Neo just because they've learned what a sh!t test is. Maybe it's because I'm not the biggest Matrix fan in the world. As a movie, I give it an "okay".HumbleNinja said:To be honest all this red pill stuff is nothing new to anyone who has a clue before hearing the term "red pill" related to whatever they dislike in regards to chicks.
They say never listen to women's dating advice. But I've always remembered something my mother told me: "Women are fickle". I think that's an even truer statement than "Women are hypergamous" - because women will dump you for another man of equal or less value than you (not just higher value). Once they tire of you, they will go to any guy who stirs some fresh excitement in them. Could be the pool boy, the trash guy, whatever.Totally agree with the OP. Hypergamy, in one word, pretty much explains the whole lot. Your skill in the game determines whether you are on the good end or the bad end of it.
Either the point flew over a few diseased minds or they refuse to aknowledge their own foolery.PairPlusRoyalFlush said:Any point you think you made was made 50 posts ago when this mania started with you.
Hahahaha omg I almost choked on my coffee right there. Fukin hilarious!HumbleNinja said:Either the point flew over a few diseased minds or they refuse to aknowledge their own foolery.
I ain't the dude crying over some "BPD" in threads, nor one of the mass amount of dudes who flock to the NC thread yet for some reason cannot implement or stick with it, nor am I one of the Talibanosphere control freaks who complain and attempt to disguise it as "helping" others or simply "informing" them, nor one of the dudes who trips over themselves going after slvts then acting like it isn't their own fault. (How many times does one keep seeking out slvts and not realize THEY just might be the problem?)
Some dudes on here are one more red pill menstruation away from sporting their own vag!na.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
That's biased. You are telling me that toddlers know 10+10 = 20? If that's the case, why do we need diagrams and Skittles to teach them. The amount of men who had their eyes open after being introduced to the red pill far outweight the 'Pfft that's common sense.' Not so humble now, are we?Originally Posted by HumbleNinja
To be honest all this red pill stuff is nothing new to anyone who has a clue before hearing the term "red pill" related to whatever they dislike in regards to chicks.
What you are saying is that if a woman cheats on you, it's obvious that you didn't have enough good game to prevent her from doing so.Turuwal said:Totally agree with the OP. Hypergamy, in one word, pretty much explains the whole lot. Your skill in the game determines whether you are on the good end or the bad end of it.
If some dude who's old enough to join SS isn't aware that men and women get married and it could end in divorce, isn't aware that women lie just like men do, isn't aware that chicks and people in general get influenced by the world around them including TV etc., isn't aware that women have sex just like men do etc...that dudes or dudes have some serious lack of exposure to the outside world period let alone women. Obvious is obvious.BeDJ said:This sh!t again, I can't believe my words are being used to support NAWALT propaganda. The same fvcking "You've just been dealing with trash, find a keeper and stop b!tching mantra." Doesn't it spark some curiosity that a ton of men are agreeing about it? Wait, maybe they are just a bunch of whiners and should just Man Up!
That's biased. You are telling me that toddlers know 10+10 = 20? If that's the case, why do we need diagrams and Skittles to teach them. The amount of men who had their eyes open after being introduced to the red pill far outweight the 'Pfft that's common sense.' Not so humble, are we now?
Now wait a second here. A therapist? You mean bartender right?HumbleNinja said:If some dude who's old enough to join SS isn't aware that men and women get married and it could end in divorce, isn't aware that women lie just like men do, isn't aware that chicks and people in general get influenced by the world around them including TV etc., isn't aware that women have sex just like men do etc...that dudes or dudes have some serious lack of exposure to the outside world period let alone women. Obvious is obvious.
And instead of playing with p0rn diagrams and bags of Red (pill) Skittles in their basement, shouldn't even bother trying to learn to pick up chicks, nor go after them, but seek out some serious mental health counseling instead and possibly seek the authorities (Or Charles Ramsey himself) to investigate the possiblity they were held hostage from life by an unknown captor.
If you retort to mocking men who are debating your opinion, you know your argument is weak. Stop hanging out with metro-sexuals at high-end department stores, there's more than meets the eye-liner.HumbleNinja said:If some dude who's old enough to join SS isn't aware that men and women get married and it could end in divorce, isn't aware that women lie just like men do, isn't aware that chicks and people in general get influenced by the world around them including TV etc., isn't aware that women have sex just like men do etc...that dudes or dudes have some serious lack of exposure to the outside world period let alone women. Obvious is obvious.
And instead of playing with p0rn diagrams and bags of Red (pill) Skittles in their basement, shouldn't even bother trying to learn to pick up chicks, nor go after them, but seek out some serious mental health counseling instead and possibly seek the authorities (Or Charles Ramsey himself) to investigate the possiblity they were held hostage from life by an unknown captor.
Anyone care to debate this claim?HumbleNinja (Paraphrased) said:Men should know better
Humble ninja sounds like he is in support of mainstream gender equality, and a liberal.BeDJ said:If you retort to mocking men who are debating your opinion, you know your argument is weak. Stop hanging out with metro-sexuals at high-end department stores, there's more than meets the eye-liner.
To sum up YOUR argument.
Anyone care to debate this claim?
When someone suggested in another thread that you were a woman I didn't see it. But I do now. You argue like a chick. Specificly distorting and oversimplifying points that have been made althewhile conveniently skipping over the operative elements of those points, being totally condescending about it in the process, and attempting to use to your distorted version as a shaming tool. Particularly, shaming by insinuating that those making the points you disagree with are of poor upbringing, socially maladjusted or psycologically damaged. All TEXTBOOK chick tactics. Most telling of all, you open by questioning maturity, which is a uniquely female obsession and constant fuel for shaming tactics.HumbleNinja said:If some dude who's old enough to join SS isn't aware that men and women get married and it could end in divorce, isn't aware that women lie just like men do, isn't aware that chicks and people in general get influenced by the world around them including TV etc., isn't aware that women have sex just like men do etc...that dudes or dudes have some serious lack of exposure to the outside world period let alone women. Obvious is obvious.
And instead of playing with p0rn diagrams and bags of Red (pill) Skittles in their basement, shouldn't even bother trying to learn to pick up chicks, nor go after them, but seek out some serious mental health counseling instead and possibly seek the authorities (Or Charles Ramsey himself) to investigate the possiblity they were held hostage from life by an unknown captor.
noobolgy said:Humble ninja sounds like he is in support of mainstream gender equality, and a liberal.
Hell I mock myself! I'm a 44yo BETA and PROUD virgin! Why is it that "real mens" feewings get hurt so easily on these forums? They can dish it out but can't take it. It's pretty telling sign of just how "Alpha" they really are..BeDJ said:If you retort to mocking men who are debating your opinion, you know your argument is weak. Stop hanging out with metro-sexuals at high-end department stores, there's more than meets the eye-liner.
To sum up YOUR argument.
Anyone care to debate this claim?
BINGO!!!dasein said:1. "Bitterness" is a gynoculture word, a shaming term, a semantic nullity. It has no place in any kind of precise language that attempts to describe emotions. You won't hear any scientists, scholars or legitimate thinkers using it, so where did it come from?
"Angry," "annoyed," "frustrated," "unhappy," etc., many better words. So perhaps the first step is to choose a noncompromised vocabulary to describe feelings more precisely and realize there are vocabulary traps set all around us by "blue pill" gynoculture. We haven't really taken the red pill until we have flushed out ALL of the blue conditioning, and that's much more difficult and time-consuming than the "pill taking" analogy suggests.
Almost all of the time I've heard "bitter" being applied has been by a woman to a man or by an effeminate or gay man towards whomever. My male friends and I don't use it... certainly never heard my dad, grandfathers or uncles say it. It is a feminine word and operates as a simple shaming tool. If someone is just angry, they may not be at fault, after all, many situations in life deserve an angry response. If they are 'bitter' though, there is a presumption that their feelings are misplaced and that they share blame for having them. Don't play.
"Bitter" is a taste sensation, people who use it as a "feeling" term generally have manipulative, feminine intent IME. Move past gynoculture language, be it the word "bitter" or otherwise to move past -their- frame towards -your- frame.
Atom Smasher is one of my favorite posters on SS. He is always spot on with his advice. He has seen the reformulation of women first hand. He has the knowledge and the experience. You should post more in the forum sir. Theexception is either delusional or has very little experience with women. I know people just like him. They always find out later when their fictional bubble about women bursts.Atom Smasher said:40 years ago women had a far greater capacity for rational thought, nurturing, propriety, and dare I say even loyalty. The media has opened the floodgates in them and these admirable qualities have poured out of them en masse, leaving easily 97% of women almost completely bereft of the qualities we men admire.
Great job pointing that out t!ts. I don't agree with dasein with his misconceptions about the conservative right wing media, but here he is spot on with the using of the word "bitter".( . )( . ) said:Backfire thread of the year. Ironically the quoted dasein post the OP was trying to "disprove" was the best part of this entire trainwreck.
I don't know, but you sound like a woman. Your threads always take a feministic point of view. Similar to how a proud feminist authors in the articles below. She proudly uses the word "bitter" for her site.TheException said:Overdose case # 1
Here is a guy who spends 3 paragraphs on why the word "bitter" should be erased from the dictionary. "Bitter" is a word made up by society and if you use that word you are still blue pill according to dasein. Too much mental masturbating about stupid things. "Bitter" is a synonym for "resentment" pal and congratulations on being "too macho" to use the word. Nobody cares. There are more important things going on here than to nit-pick at select vocabulary.
And notice how he uses the word "shaming". I was once a very strong user of this word, but lately people are destroying it and the purpose it was meant to serve. It originally was to be used AGAINST WOMEN...who would attempt to make a man feel bad about his sexual nature and being. NOW...."red pill extremists" use it against other men because they cant take criticism for their illogical views. One ounce of criticism and they rationalize that the criticism is an attempt to shame them.....pathetic
I don't think it's so much the media as much as it is man's worshiping at the feet of *****.40 years ago women had a far greater capacity for rational thought, nurturing, propriety, and dare I say even loyalty. The media has opened the floodgates in them and these admirable qualities have poured out of them en masse, leaving easily 97% of women almost completely bereft of the qualities we men admire.
I hope you were being sarcastic. I'm presuming you were.rascal99v said:Great job pointing that out t!ts. I don't agree with dasein with his misconceptions about the conservative right wing media, but here he is spot on with the using of the word "bitter".