Originally posted by iqqi
why don't you tell us why YOU don't go for promiscuous women.
Like I said, I cannot reconcile in a way that is satisfactory even to myself.
I'll try my best, but understand that even I think my thinking is severely flawed here in many respects. Here it is:
First, the best that I can think of is that I somehow that the thing that most men want is a woman sexually (because all else is platonic without the sex). Therefore, the single thing that makes it sexual is a woman's vagina, by definition, and therefore the vagina is a most coveted and valuable thing. It is also something that women can freely give away, ie. if a woman were to walk down the street, she could fvck men by the thousands. So, if a woman did in fact give it up that easily, it decreases the value of her vagina.
The flawed thinking in this: a women is not wanted merely for her vagina and hence giving it up so easily has zero effect on the value of her as a human being. Sex is sex, that emotional bond that two special people might have has nothing to do with the actual sex.
Second, that if a woman is able to have emotionally detached sex at any time and does so with a multitude of partners, she would be better able to have that same unattached emotionless sex tht would enable her to be unfaithful with greater ease and without being detected as easily. E.g. if a particular woman views sex emotionally, if she wer to cheat, chances are it would be more evident and harder to hide. If, however, a woman is able to fvck nearly any guy without emotional involvement, she could go years without being detected.
The flaw: merely having been sexually active is no indicator of a woman's integrity, honesty, or loyalty in any given relationship.
As I said, I still find both these answers to be unsatisfactory either for or against.
