See... This is where you're wrong, and assuming things. I'm speaking from the perspective of a good looking guy (in women's eyes). Never had problems attracting women initially, or having them approach, but couldn't KEEP them interested. That's the whole point I'm making. Looks do matter, but you can't rely solely on them. It doesn't matter if you're "hot", or not. Other qualities are still required - IF you are to make it past the initial attraction / ONS zone. I never disputed that good looking guys can't get laid, don't have it easier, aren't approached or sought after, don't get away with more, aren't given multiple chances, or any of that.
As well, you don't have to be "hot" to land women. Nobody other than you is talking about ugly guys, and how game doesn't help them. No ****. Again, there are varying degrees of looks, everyone has different tastes and standards, and there are several steps you can take to present yourself in an appealing, socialable, attractive fashion. Wardrobe, hairstyle, build, hygeine, etc. And then things like confidence, assertiveness, social likeliness and ability, CONVERSATIONAL SKILLS, status, open sexuality, etc - these can all boost you up there.
Yes, they still have put more effort than the good looking guys, but that doesn't mean they can't land women. Nor does it mean that the good looking guys can KEEP a woman interested just by looking pretty. This is ESPECIALLY true of the "high class", hot girls - who have high standards beyond just looks. "Hot" guys are a dime-a-dozen to them... it's not impressive - only required.
In many instances, they'll choose a high status, confident, aggressive, strong, "attractive" guy over a hot, shy, insecure, sexually closed off momma's boy wussbag. Again, nobody is talking about ugly guys, here.
I'm just repeating everything I've already said to you, by the way.
As for what I'm doing: nothing in regards to looks (other than losing weight, again), because that was never the problem, and isn't the only thing you need to KEEP someone interested.
The only thing I'm "angry" about is you not being able to respond properly, and spamming the same **** over and over - when it has nothing to do with the direction of the conversation.
You're looking at everything from a very limited, one-sided, B&W lense. More than anything, you don't know what you're talking about beyond your narrow scope.
Good day. :kick: