shift key wrote:
"God_of_getting_layed, you don't think a nuclear holocost would change the course of technology? "
So let me get this straight, you buy that a nuclear holocuas is only going to only wipe out computer technology, but leave behind advanced time travel technology?
If a nuclear holocuast would wipe out all of the computer technology, it will highly likely wipe out time travel as well, so we wouldnt be seeing and john titor.
Looks like your logic sucks, becuase you seem to beleive a nuclear holocuast is selective in what technology it destroys. EIther most of the technology will be destroyed, meaning both computer technology and time travel will be destroyed, or little of it will be destroyed, meaning that time travel and most computer technology will be preserved. So since John Titor supposedly came here, then the holocuast must have not destroyed much technology, so then its logical that the advanced computers should be there, but of course, he doesnt mention them at all.
Also, dont forget, a super advanced computer such as the breed he failed to mention is more likely to control a time machine than the ones we are using today. So this is even more reason why if the time travel technology is going to be preserved, so will the super advanced computer technology. but again, he didnt say anything about his time machine being powered by any revolutionary computers. This is evidence of an ignorant hoaxter
Also, dont give me the "Flying car" point. Everyone knows computers are advancing faster than cars ever have. Look at the rate, a car hasnt changed too much in the past 50 years, and their have been zero car innovations. But in the past 20 years, computers have advanced rapidly, and also has some innovations, such as the quantum computer MIT is working on, so its ludicrous to say computers are going to evolve like cars, and 40 years from now, they wont be much different. Besides, one reason we dont have flying cars today is becuase we dont need them as much as we need the benefits of advanced computers, therefore computers will advance faster due to more effort and money put into it becuase its valued alot more than a flying car. I can see quantum computers revolutionizing our lives, but I cant see a flying car doing that. so then its logical that science will drive computer technology faster than car technology.
Another point, the manual that John had on his site for his time machine says that has a military reference in it. This suggests that his time machine supposedly is military technology. If it is military technology, than this would explain why it survived the nuclear holocuast; the military probably kept all the most valuable technology safe, like in a fall out shelter. IF they're going to do this, you better beleive theyre going to bring the quantum technology down in that fall out shelter with them.
Did I mention the time machine is more likely to use the super computer technology than todays computer technology, the very kind of technology John fails to mention which is would likely be responsible for his journey through time. How are you going to leave something like that out?
Shift key, it looks like your logic is the only one that sucks, you for some reason want to beleive a nucleaur holocuast is selective in destroying technology. lol, idiot