Search results

this is what happens when you play with fire, didn't your mother warn you - ??? you're in the midst of a slow moving car wreck and all you can do is sit and watch that means: there's more pain coming and you can't avoid it you can't dump her you won't leave her you may try, but that's...

ah, so you're reading body language, are you? sure, she's carrying a torch for her ex or is in competition and wants to prove something to him and he has the upper hand at the moment which swings back around to you - as in, is she with you to prove something to her ex? stuff to prove: she...

randomly? explain I can't imagine any such thing

you need more to go on before it becomes a warning sign for you -- this doesn't get close interesting that your antenae are up - wonder if something's behind that? ignoring it is a good thing. at this point it remains obsessive signal reading on something so small and will lead you into...

the AFC brain... hmmm.. I've heard of the reptilian brain, the central cortex, etc. gotta wonder about the AFC brain: is it new? will it breed (or non-breed) itself out of existence? that is, is it an evolutionary disfunction that takes care of itself by breeding itself out of...

A few things i picked up: she's more interested in others she's in control of the situation - that means the pace, what happens, etc. you're useful for filling out a crowd and being reliable in showing guys are after her did anybody say "oneitis"? a year? jeezuss..... give her...

Haven't been whining boobster. Just saying you need to pick up your game.

One thought, one post, is it? Tried that once but it doesn't advance a discussion anywhere - seems you can't take anything below a certain simple level. I'll say what I want and how I want to say it to my satisfaction. What I said above is fairly clear. Anyway, we're getting nowhere...

ooo - that's cute. Burned me with that remark, didn't you? Reminds me of a typical barstool blowhard doing their best to tell a funny. It's not whining, guy, just calling it as I see it. Big difference.

I'm not following you Raw, can you lay it out? Boobies, this is what I'm talkin' about. I see an unsupported comment accusing another poster of emotionalism, illogical arguments, etc. basically by making emotional, unsupported argument that probably can't be logically supported. Argument...

Lack of response? Sure. It was 2 a.m. and I had an 8 a.m. mtg at work. I went and got some sleep. Then I worked all day. Then I worked elsewhere for the rest of evening. Everything starts all over tomorrow -- same bat-time, same bat-channel. My apologies for being slow in responding. I...

you misread it. wyldfire was an instance. this was to be applied more broadly than that as i see this as endemic to the board and applicable to a number of other posters, not just wyld. as i said, and i repeat, she doesn't need me defending her and typically defends herself on her own...

The reasons why men have to pay child support even if there was deception, accidents, acts of god or whatever else happens has been established law for awhile now. Old stuff that. Wyld gave a fairly clear thumbnail description why the courts see it that way. In my experience usually young...

Re: woah... Nothing new on that, guy, remember the psalms? "...all is vanity...nothing new under the sun..." (or was that ecclesiastes? i so forget..) If this figure is true that I quoted, I would guess it remains what it always was historically, or maybe a touch less, but not by much...

That's probably it. No reason to ask. At some point you'll realize your intuition or your assessment is pretty good and to go with it. If you have to use a scientific method everytime for confirming what you suspect, you won't get anywhere fast. But then again (not sure how this sounds in...

Is that the real question? Her behavior is what it is. Acceptable, though? An AFC will rationalize it, make excuses for it or blame himself (or both, usually) and try harder. Someone else will find the underlying attitude behind this indicative of low IL or unacceptable and not waste...

Re: err... excuuuuuse you? Wasn't there a study in the Seattle area that found 10-15% of kids were not biologically related to their father? Heard that somewhere...