Women graduating in college more than men

[Syrio]

But the things taught on this forum work, which isn't stupid or wrong, it simply sheds light on how women work.

Your and idiot if you think misandry doesn't exist. It means you should go educate yourself on the subject, you obviously have lack of knowledge and experience.

You have examples, and facts given to you, yet you choose to ignore them. Which is kind of what women do.

How many women have you actually been with?

To me after I found this website, I though a lot about my past experiences with women and found the information here to be mostly true.

You being a software engineer gives you zero credibility on this site. Feminists at wk (whiteknights) think very similarly to the way you do.

So are you a virgin?

For example this --> http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=208113 , Works very well. I did this way before I knew about sosuave, figured it out on my own. It worked very well to my benefit. The reason the relationship failed, is because eventually i became nice at the very tail end.

If you think this site is stupid, you have zero experience with women. You will never get laid thinking that way. Enjoy your porn.

I never said that the things on this forum don't work. I never even gave my stance on that issue. You are making things up. Clearly you're pretty stupid lol... but anyway, here is my stance: I agree with a lot of the general ideas. I especially agree with a lot of the older things, like posts by Pook. I have a feeling you didn't read, or at least didn't comprehend (not surprisingly) what I wrote, because it had nothing to do with this. That's not what this thread is about. I never said these things you are accusing me of saying so you're really just kind of arguing with yourself and putting my username in there for some reason. Calm down.

I also never said misandry doesn't exist. I said that we, as men, have it better in the world than women do. See previous post for why, or just use common sense instead of being a blind idiot.

This forum isn't meant to be a place for people to cry about misandry. This forum isn't even about misandry at all, yet I see so much complaining about it here. This forum is about self-improvement and how to interact with women.

 

[( . )( . )]

Women graduating in college more than men

Hence why "degrees" are becoming increasingly worthless now. That increase of women graduating is not in STEM fields either so it's kind of a non issue. It's just a statistic the cathedral likes to trot out every few months to appease the femcunts.

"Germany has a long history when it comes to misandry and demonizing the male sex. For instance, in German kindergartens the boys are literally forced to urinate while sitting"

Reminds me of a post I just read over at Takimag:

Speaking from experience, when they (the harridan teachers) see the little boys tackling one another out on the playground in a rousing game of smear the queer, they haul the little boys inside and deprive them of recess--the very thing they need the most to escape the stultifying prison of classroom chairs--for being too rough. The message? Learn to play like the girls who don't get grass stains on their knees or tear the breast pockets of their shirts.

And back indoors, if the little boys are too exuberant and jump out of their chairs waving their hands in the air when they finally know the answer to one of the teacher's questions (which are generally so irrelevant that only girls know about them), she studiously avoids calling on him because of his lack of manners. That'l teach the little guy, let em know early in life that it's not what you know but how you go about sucking up to authority.

Personally I think if you're the father of a white male you'd have to be borderline retarded now to put your kid in a public skool. If he doesn't come out the other end a self hating adderall addicted weirdo two steps shy of pulling an Elliot Rodger it would be a sheer miracle. Phuck that noise. Not to mention if my 6 year old came home parroting "diversity is our strength" or some other marxist pablum sh!t I think I would go Hulk. There's a good reason why homeschooling has risen 65% in four years and obongo and his handlers are pushing to ban it.

The inmates are running the asylum

 

[Syrio]

What kind of feminist nonsense is this? The point was that the grading is bogus so women will get into majors and get the jobs (which they will one way or another due to affirmative action) and "prove" they are superior to males.

GPA, especially between 3.0-4.0 isn't about working harder. That assumes that the grading is objective and unbaised in the first place. A higher GPA should indicate you are more intelligent, you produce more intelligent, higher quality work and possess knowledge, tested through many tests and exams. The brightest student can make say advance calculus assignments look easy and complete it quickly, while another struggles all night long.

Most courses have much of the grade (supposedly) dependent on tests and exams performance. So if these high GPA females are earning the GPA (and test scores), how are they doing it if they are "bad at tests"?

When the test is standardized and there's only one right answer, no BS biased grading and no partial credit, suddenly these female geniuses with high GPA's and advance degrees become "bad test takers".

The 2nd paragraph was just more of your feminist falshoods and ranting demonstrating you have no credibility.

What I wrote about GPA has nothing to do with feminism, so you're wrong there again.

GPA IS about working harder - that's exactly what it's about. GPA is not a measure of intelligence. Maybe it's meant to be, but it clearly isn't. There are countless examples of people who show this to be true.

I definitely would not say that most courses have a large percentage of their grade dependent on tests. Furthermore, if they did then the answers would be objective so your whole complaint about bias would fall apart. I would say that about half of the courses where I went to college did not have tests. Many of them were entirely essays and/or random assignments.

Instead of just saying that what I said about society is false, maybe take it apart point by point like I've done to destroy all of your attempts to make points? You can't just sit here and say I'm wrong for no reason. Furthermore you really don't seem to know what feminism is. Objectively measuring the reality of a situation is not feminism. Feminism is supporting the empowerment of women, which is not what I'm doing at all. I'm just taking a step out of the fantasy world that so many people on this forum live in. You included.

 

[VikingKing]

I never said that the things on this forum don't work. I never even gave my stance on that issue. You are making things up. Clearly you're pretty stupid lol... but anyway, here is my stance: I agree with a lot of the general ideas. I especially agree with a lot of the older things, like posts by Pook. I have a feeling you didn't read, or at least didn't comprehend (not surprisingly) what I wrote, because it had nothing to do with this. That's not what this thread is about. I never said these things you are accusing me of saying so you're really just kind of arguing with yourself and putting my username in there for some reason. Calm down.

I also never said misandry doesn't exist. I said that we, as men, have it better in the world than women do. See previous post for why, or just use common sense instead of being a blind idiot.

This forum isn't meant to be a place for people to cry about misandry. This forum isn't even about misandry at all, yet I see so much complaining about it here. This forum is about self-improvement and how to interact with women.

You said "I think feminism is pretty dumb honestly, but I think the opposite (i.e. almost everything on this forum) is even more stupid."

 

[VikingKing]

I never said that the things on this forum don't work. I never even gave my stance on that issue. You are making things up. Clearly you're pretty stupid lol... but anyway, here is my stance: I agree with a lot of the general ideas. I especially agree with a lot of the older things, like posts by Pook. I have a feeling you didn't read, or at least didn't comprehend (not surprisingly) what I wrote, because it had nothing to do with this. That's not what this thread is about. I never said these things you are accusing me of saying so you're really just kind of arguing with yourself and putting my username in there for some reason. Calm down.

I also never said misandry doesn't exist. I said that we, as men, have it better in the world than women do. See previous post for why, or just use common sense instead of being a blind idiot.

This forum isn't meant to be a place for people to cry about misandry. This forum isn't even about misandry at all, yet I see so much complaining about it here. This forum is about self-improvement and how to interact with women.

You said "I think feminism is pretty dumb honestly, but I think the opposite (i.e. almost everything on this forum) is even more stupid."


That is your position. You can try to gaslight, but to late now.

 

[JaegerPilot217]

Yup. Or make the same or more money. This shows how shallow women are. Normal men do not care if a woman went to college, or makes a lot of money. So now that women are allowed to work and go to college, it sets the bar higher. Which is nonsense.

Then they want to cry "where are all the good men?"

The great thing is, a lot of men don't go to college, and start successful businesses. So degree or not, we generally do better. Fvck working in an office dominated by women, I will never, ever, ever do that... Make your own office.

But the funny thing is men aren't marrying much anymore. Especially the more "alpha" type personalities.

Don't worry gents women are far more unhappy since the feminist movement. I bet the happiest women in our society are against feminism.

Ya the protective role is fine, no problem with, its the provider role I hate having to do with women

 

[VikingKing]

What I wrote about GPA has nothing to do with feminism, so you're wrong there again.

GPA IS about working harder - that's exactly what it's about. GPA is not a measure of intelligence. Maybe it's meant to be, but it clearly isn't. There are countless examples of people who show this to be true.

I definitely would not say that most courses have a large percentage of their grade dependent on tests. Furthermore, if they did then the answers would be objective so your whole complaint about bias would fall apart. I would say that about half of the courses where I went to college did not have tests. Many of them were entirely essays and/or random assignments.

Instead of just saying that what I said about society is false, maybe take it apart point by point like I've done to destroy all of your attempts to make points? You can't just sit here and say I'm wrong for no reason. Furthermore you really don't seem to know what feminism is. Objectively measuring the reality of a situation is not feminism. Feminism is supporting the empowerment of women, which is not what I'm doing at all. I'm just taking a step out of the fantasy world that so many people on this forum live in. You included.

For a software engineer, your pretty slow. I never realized your job is that easy.

We already established that women get higher gpa's due to a bias in colleges. It's not working harder, its getting a handicap for being "oppressed"

 

[Merciless Dj]

there is no problem with grades being subjective.

I don´t know how can you say such thing, no point in arguing this.
Personally I believe that education is just a pre-requirement to get into business at whatever you do, but it´s pretty much worthless because as someone here said, it´s a sequence of chores that are subjective/worthless. Good thing we have STEM careers.

the professors have plenty of choice in what they allow students to go on about in class. Maybe they have to be a bit careful if they are new, but professors with tenure can pretty much do whatever the fvck they want.

How is this supposed to be alright? That makes education totally biased and subjective. I believe that education is a system to check who is alienated enough to be an efficient loyal worker who only listens and obeys but in that sense why would you want to make a filter that isn´t objective, other than to promote biased ideas?

Because European history isn't exactly a happy-go-lucky fairy tale lol...

It´s not supposed to be either positive or negative, people who understand the world in terms of good and bad, right and wrong, live in more fantasy than the ones who don´t.

A lot of people aren't good at taking tests but they are smart and work hard.

GPA IS about working harder - that's exactly what it's about.

I have been told that so many times by family and females. I can´t stand the time I spend sitting on a chair to score in tests, because I know that it´s totally worthless, just to prove I obey the indications. As someone said, men are objective driven, and it´s annoying as hell to sit to do something that you are told that is for your future when you know is a worthless grade and you are not really learning anything useful (pretty much any non-STEM subject), whereas women seem to be ok with following indications, and I believe that this is ingrained in their nature.

we, as men, have it a lot better in society than women do. The whole world is way safer for us physically, we make a LOT more money, and the world is ruled by men. The vast majority of political leaders are men, the vast majority of wealthy people are men

we, as men, have it better in the world than women do

Well this is a nonsense fallacy. Safer physically? Are you kidding me, this is the 21th century but I believe that as humans physical strength hasn´t been relevant for thousands of years, we don´t live in the savannah, or comunicate via grunts. Men gaining more money, nonsense fallacy as well, I don´t know where you get that from (my own father has gained less money than my mother for most of his life, since he left some jobs so he could settle, and he´s been what seems to me a sad beta who believes that he lives a happy live) About men being on the top, Danger made a great point. I have never seen women being power-driven, their nature seem to be the origin of this conformist society we live in.
I have realized that women aren´t as willing to leave their home in order to achieve power and improve themselves. I believe it´s in their nature as well to settle and stay at I given place, but I believe men are not sedentary by nature, although society tells us to settle instead of travel around the world and gain power and knowledge. How many women you know that leave the people and places they know to start new lives and jobs and self-improve for extended periods of time? From my own experience they don´t leave home as much as men neither.

There is a reason that men have dominated for the entirety of human history

I don´t buy this, It´s likely to be true (We won´t know since we can´t travel to the past), but I think it´s exaggerated. Many of the conquerors and men of history had wives/women who had emotional control over them. The person who appears in front of the court is not always who has the power.


Don´t misunderstand me, although I believe education is worthless I’m still planning into getting my degrees with top grades, because it doesn´t require that much effort and i´ll make my parents happy, but I have thought about dropping them many times because I know that whenever I´m over with that is when the real work comes. All this women, even if they had “better” degrees or whatever than me are not going to build nearly as much wealth and POWER as I’m going to, they´ll live the conformist lives they wish.

 

[Syrio]

Noobology:

If you can't make a distinction between what I was referring to in that statement and what you were referring to, then you are too dumb of a person to get a response. I don't waste my time on people who are THAT dumb =/ sorry

Danger:

LOL Never called you names. I gave up because you are beyond help and I didn't want to spend so much time talking to someone who is unwilling to listen or too dumb to understand. I'll give you a response here though.

Why your points are wrong, in order:

1. You think the world is more dangerous for men because they die in wars? I think you know this argument is ridiculously weak at best. Men volunteer to go to war. The danger of dying in war isn't really applicable in every day lives in the United States. Women, on the other hand, have to deal with getting jumped if they walk around alone at night, or even during the day in some sketchy areas. As men, we can walk almost anywhere without fear of being assaulted. This is not the case for women.

2. It's interesting that you say this because the US Census seems to disagree with you.

3. The reason most people in prison are men is because the VAST majority of violent crimes are committed by men, which is because men are inherently more violent. I don't know about the homeless thing but probably the same reason. At any rate, you can say with 100% certainty that it has nothing to do with "misandry". Also that comparison isn't a fallacy. What you are saying objectively doesn't make sense.

 

[Stagger Lee]

Why your points are wrong, in order:

1. You think the world is more dangerous for men because they die in wars? I think you know this argument is ridiculously weak at best. Men volunteer to go to war. The danger of dying in war isn't really applicable in every day lives in the United States. Women, on the other hand, have to deal with getting jumped if they walk around alone at night, or even during the day in some sketchy areas. As men, we can walk almost anywhere without fear of being assaulted. This is not the case for women.

2. It's interesting that you say this because the US Census seems to disagree with you.

3. The reason most people in prison are men is because the VAST majority of violent crimes are committed by men, which is because men are inherently more violent. I don't know about the homeless thing but probably the same reason. At any rate, you can say with 100% certainty that it has nothing to do with "misandry". Also that comparison isn't a fallacy. What you are saying objectively doesn't make sense.

1. you never heard of selective service, the draft? Men don't just "volunteer" to die in war. They sign up for the military for a job and placed in combat, unlike female personnel. Men face more violence from other men than women do by far.

2. Is a non-point.

Which brings us to

3. Not everyone in jail is there because of commiting violent crime. And the ones that are, very few are from commiting violent crime against just women. You know, women can commit violence, kill their spouse, commit sexual offenses and never receive prison sentences? Misandry. And you absolutely can say males being more represented at the bottom is due to misandry.

So according to you, if men are at the bottem of society it's their own fault. If women are not at the top of the society, it's not women's fault, again it's men's fault. If some men are at the top of society, it's because they hold down and opress women. If a woman does better than men, then it's totally due to her own merit against all the odds.

You are just a denier and a men hating feminist. You are probably the biggest feminist troll this board has ever had.

 

[VikingKing]

Noobology:

If you can't make a distinction between what I was referring to in that statement and what you were referring to, then you are too dumb of a person to get a response. I don't waste my time on people who are THAT dumb =/ sorry

Danger:

LOL Never called you names. I gave up because you are beyond help and I didn't want to spend so much time talking to someone who is unwilling to listen or too dumb to understand. I'll give you a response here though.

Why your points are wrong, in order:

1. You think the world is more dangerous for men because they die in wars? I think you know this argument is ridiculously weak at best. Men volunteer to go to war. The danger of dying in war isn't really applicable in every day lives in the United States. Women, on the other hand, have to deal with getting jumped if they walk around alone at night, or even during the day in some sketchy areas. As men, we can walk almost anywhere without fear of being assaulted. This is not the case for women.

2. It's interesting that you say this because the US Census seems to disagree with you.

3. The reason most people in prison are men is because the VAST majority of violent crimes are committed by men, which is because men are inherently more violent. I don't know about the homeless thing but probably the same reason. At any rate, you can say with 100% certainty that it has nothing to do with "misandry". Also that comparison isn't a fallacy. What you are saying objectively doesn't make sense.

Male feminist virgin

 

[jurry]

Male feminist virgin

There it is, the standard sosuave response to someone who disagrees with indiscriminate blame on women for all lifes problems.

Christ you're dumb.

 

[G_Govan]

To add insult to injury I witnessed several instances of guys helping or outright completing school work for chicks when I was in college. Whenever we had group projects who do you think contributed the least most of the time. One guy got so pissed off at a chick who didn't help with a project that he blew up at her in the middle of class, understandably so. We're paying a lot of money for these useless classes to obtain a piece of paper for increased job prospects and they treat it like it's no big deal.

At the end of the day they're praised for graduating more and we're ridiculed. Such is life...

 

[VikingKing]

double post

 

[HoneyHitter]

I studied computer science, where grades are almost entirely objective. This is the case in most sciences, and certainly is the case in math. Either way, there is no problem with grades being subjective.

Great, I studied Computer Science too.

And I'd just like to note that in my four years of college, all of my professors were pretty objective except for one, who everyone knew clearly favored male students.

A professor that favored male students? Really?

I don't know exactly where you studied but men outnumbered women at my university. These are the male-female ratios I witnessed within my group:
Year 1 - 21:3
Year 2 - 17:2
Year 3 - 12:1

And from looking up the stats back then, I'm pretty sure these numbers were the same if not worse at other universities.

I'm really curious how you drew the conclusion that male students are favored at a computer science class, when there aren't many women attending these classes to begin with? The girls in my group were always talking about how hard the tests were and none of them ever got above average scores. And contrary to the majority of male students, the female students rarely studied all by themselves.

I don't know about you, but I (as a man) am capable of getting better grades than most women. They don't have any advantage over me, and even if they did I wouldn't b1tch about it.

Great, keep up the good work!

I am a male and I'm definitely not a feminist, so you're wrong again. I think feminism is pretty dumb honestly, but I think the opposite (i.e. almost everything on this forum) is even more stupid.

A non-feminist would say "... but I think the opposite (i.e. almost everything on this forum) is just as stupid."

I at least have the common sense to recognize that we, as men, have it a lot better in society than women do. The whole world is way safer for us physically, we make a LOT more money, and the world is ruled by men. The vast majority of political leaders are men, the vast majority of wealthy people are men, and then people come here and complain that we are oppressed? It's just ridiculous.

Syrio, please consider the following:

- A major catastrophy occurs. Who are the ones to be saved first? Men or women?

- A man is beating a woman in public. How long does it take for anyone to intervene or show concern?
Alright, so what happens when we reverse roles? (Which by the way happens more often) What happens now?
Just take a look at this, as an example.

- How many men are in prison? How many women?

- How many men pay child support for kids they barely see? How many women?

- You're a decent programmer applying for a job at Google. Who's more likely to get the job? A man or woman?

There is a reason that men have dominated for the entirety of human history, and it's not because of physical size/strength. Don't make up excuses and try to act like a victim... just go grab your fvcking balls and solve your problems.

Women (and useless men) are draining our societal resources. And getting undue credit on top of that. That's a collective problem. The discussion on this board is an attempt to formulate possible solutions for this problem.

If you don't like it, don't join the conversation.

 

[VikingKing]

There it is, the standard sosuave response to someone who disagrees with indiscriminate blame on women for all lifes problems.

Christ you're dumb.

Another feminist? I don't blame women as a whole. I blame the individuals who allowed women the right to be considered equal to men.


You know we have a lot of problems here in the u.s. There are many veterans who are homeless, no one cares. Yet we have money for foodstamps and welfare for parasitic single mothers and their children? Honestly If I had a choice, I would choose to not contribute to helping single mothers in any way shape or form, its wrong that I can't opt out.

Having to accommodate women in any way shape or form in schools, places of business, or the military, or any thing else is a waste of time, effort and money. If they want to be equal, they should be expected to do it without special treatment.

Women have way to much security in our society. They have to many options. We cater to them far to much, and it is at the expense of men. Men should be properly informed of how things are (hypergamy, game, ect) from a very young age, then asked if we would like to cater to women in society.

I bet men would say no. Women would have to either got back to life before the feminist movement, or they would have to actually have it as hard as the common man, which then they would miserably fail. Women would give up if they were held as accountable as men.

 

[logicallefty]

Another feminist? I don't blame women as a whole. I blame the individuals who allowed women the right to be considered equal to men.


You know we have a lot of problems here in the u.s. There are many veterans who are homeless, no one cares. Yet we have money for foodstamps and welfare for parasitic single mothers and their children? Honestly If I had a choice, I would choose to not contribute to helping single mothers in any way shape or form, its wrong that I can't opt out.

Having to accommodate women in any way shape or form in schools, places of business, or the military, or any thing else is a waste of time, effort and money. If they want to be equal, they should be expected to do it without special treatment.

Women have way to much security in our society. They have to many options. We cater to them far to much, and it is at the expense of men. Men should be properly informed of how things are (hypergamy, game, ect) from a very young age, then asked if we would like to cater to women in society.

I bet men would say no. Women would have to either got back to life before the feminist movement, or they would have to actually have it as hard as the common man, which then they would miserably fail. Women would give up if they were held as accountable as men.

BINGO And so long as men keep thinking with their lower heads instead of their upper heads, as many especially blue pill men do, this is never gonna change.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to noobolgy again.

 

[backbreaker]

G Govan is the only one remotely close to being correct on this issue




it's litearlly easier for women to get through college for a varity of reasons


1. the vast majority of men I know, have to be "men" by the time they are 18. Go get your own damn loans, go get your own damn place, I cant take care of a grown man, man up, **** like that. the only 2 dudes I know that live at home by the time they are in college were forced to pay rent at home to "man up" versus being able to stay at home rent free like every other female I know.




I know a girl who just turned 27, has a degree, a real job and a business that makes more htan her real job AND STILL LIVES AT HOME RENT FREE. beucase her dad "doesn't want to see her go". how many 27 year old men do you know get t live at home rent free without being called every name in the book?




on top of that, 18- 19 year old women, hot ones lol get swo much free ****. when I was 21 I apid for a girl's entire semester of school beucase I liked her. how many men can do this? this girl, with a c avg between her parents ande me lol didn't hve a penny of student loan debt when she left school.




it's just easier for women. women not only get the **** professions, kthey get to cake walk through them by getting help from everyone

 

[Syrio]

LOL this is ridiculous. I'm just reading over these posts and remembering why I stopped going on these forums for quite a while. It's just too much. Stupidity can't be reasoned with. Some of you guys are doomed to be completely delusional forever. Especially noobology haha

 

[Desdinova]

So I got on the internet and easily found with little surprise that women graduate in college way more than men. I cannot help but be perturbed by this fact.

Read the book "Men On Strike" by Helen Smith. This is quite common and there are many reasons for it.

Hence why "degrees" are becoming increasingly worthless now.

I've seen the usefulness of degrees, certificates, and even Grade 12 take a fvcking nose dive. They truly don't mean 5hit when it comes to the usefulness of the individual. The problem is the work force has NOT caught onto this fact and they still insist on hiring idiots who got their education paid for by their parents and don't have a lick of work experience or work ethic. All of this may potentially change once the baby boomers start retiring and dying (but since many haven't saved up for retirement, that may take a while). When there's not enough workers to fill positions, businesses cannot thrive. Those degrees may have to be waved in favour for work experience and on-the-job training, which is the way it SHOULD be.

Personally I think if you're the father of a white male you'd have to be borderline retarded now to put your kid in a public skool.

I've been thinking about this for quite some time now. My boy is going into grade 3. His fvck head mother had him diagnosed with ASD and ADHD. I see NONE of that in him, and I'm the one who's been there for the kid 80% of the time since day one. When I kicked his wh0re mother out of my house, she wanted to share him for half the time. Since my boy was spending most of his time with me, his development came to a screeching hault. I truly believe this is the result of his "ASD".

His ADHD is easy to explain. He doesn't want to do something he's not interested in, and he's stubborn as fvck. He's phenomenal at math and music, so why doesn't he have ADHD when it comes to those subjects? Writing, drawing and colouring don't interest him, and he puts up one hell of a fight when it comes to doing any of those. Now I personally have no interest in sporting events, so I'd be pretty stubborn and difficult if someone wanted me to write an essay about the fvcking Blue Jays.

I would love to home school my boy, but it's just not possible. He works so much better when I help him with his homework (which he was too stubborn to do at school), but it's just not going to happen and I have to fight like hell with his mother to avoid putting him on Ritalin.