Generalities.
Perusing the post I noticed "alot" of generalities, that is frightful how some of you men feel. Whether you're successful or not, all that matters is you bring to yourself what you want. However, how can you honestly go out into the world with such negative roadmaps?
It's contradictory and misogynistic. To despise and disrespect the very thing you seek to attract is ludicrous.
Can women seek men purely for MORE than their ability to harness resources?
Absolutely.
Am I happy about this?
Damn straight.
Why?
Because they're carrying their weight. It's called FREE WILL. The ability to choose. The contradiction of society is that while institutions purport we are individuals, they hand down a template of proper rules of conduct. You can't have one AND the other. It's either or. You can't be black AND white. You can't be dead AND alive in the literal sense. Nor can 1 party be free and enslaved. In a philosophical sense, yes. But not in a real sense.
What is the difference between L/T and S/T hookups?
In a L/T the lust will end. The birds will fly away, and the stars won't always become. For committment-phobes and others who have an ADD-type personality when it comes to dating (like me on occasion), there needs to be MORE there. Looks only last so long, and when that person "gets into a mood" or treats another person poorly, what else do you appreciate them for?
In a S/T hookup, it doesn't matter what they are like as a person. I've seen friends go for girls they'd refuse to be caught dead in public with, go at it like they're making home movies.
Long-term success comes from Self-Mastery. Guys wonder why they meet MORE girls as they get older. It's a natural byproduct of progression for some. For others, it depends on what you're attracting. The external circumstances of attraction and seduction are extensions of WHO you internally are. Over a long enough time horizon, who you are is evident to all.
What if how society had it before was wrong? Who's to say prior insititutions and guidelines had it any better than we do? Do we ultimately know where the current circumstances will lead us? It's mere opinions. Extending facts into the future is akin to forecasting or fortunetelling, and to base one's perception and beliefs on unconfirmed future events is to neglect your own life and your own present. Who cares?
In what way does it hurt you NOT to do as Wylde stated?
Men proclaim not to heed advice from women, but on the same topic, they would provide counsel to women and expect them to pay heed to it.
By now we all know that edgy spark of interaction, the opposite polarity of 2 individuals that strike a fire within us. It's like 2 techtonic plates STUCK, trying to edge past one another, and the resulting movement is an EARTHQUAKE. In time, tension builds again. These are the emotions we feel attraction to. It conjurs up the base emotions we have. Yet, for a woman to be a woman, she has to release her feminine essence. She must be free to love and know you're not going to go weak on her. If a guy goes weak when she goes weak, then the relationship is open to attack. One partner must remain strong and grounded, while the other can remain open and loving. THAT is the natural balance. Man and woman are loving in different ways. Man is loving in his strength, protection, and solidarity. A woman is loving in her freedom, expression, sexuality, and emotions.
This much I've sensed and witnessed. Who doesn't want to just let go? Most women want to more than any man would, yet they can't trust most guys because as they put it "some get weak". In olden days, that would be certain devastation to the relationship. Outside intruders could steal, rape, or beat a woman. A man who was weak would not be able to hunt as well, or be as brave in internal fights. Is it any different today?
No. It's adapted to fit a new mold, but it's no different. Solidarity and excitement. You can bring activities that exude life and emotion, yet remain controlled within those elements.
What we do is an extension of WHO we are.
A-Unit
