(sigh)...the looks debate. Wow. How many times has this topic been debated?
I can't believe this topic is still being debated.
~LOOKS MATTER!! READ MY POST AND I'LL PROVE IT!!~
I'm a self-described "7." I'm tall and fit (6'2", 240 lbs.), draw a respectable though nothing close to wealthy income.
Six months ago, I joined match.com. To date, 1,220 women have viewed my profile. A few women who have emailed me were HB7s, but more than I care to admit were UG's and fatties. A few dozen of the women viewers winked me—most were average-looking and most were UG’s and fatties. None were HB9’s or 10’s. Invariably, I initiated emails with all the women I perceived HB8’s-10’s because NONE of these women emailed me.
Here's the exact text of my profile:
OK, I'll be the first to admit it: I'm no prince, but I am one of a kind. I live life like an adventure, and if I like you, I will show you romance like you haven't seen in awhile.
I'm bold, confident, articulate, and passionate. I'm a fun-loving prankster and an ultimate protector. These aren't just cliche descriptions. These are me, and either you love me or hate me for it.
I seek a beautiful, caring, passionate, confident, nurturing woman who likes to shop for shoes at the mall and who likes to cook and who likes to watch football with me and laugh at my corny jokes.
Now, three months ago, I designed a
fake match.com profile. I wanted to see how women would react to a "hot" guy's profile versus my HG7 profile.
Basically, I wanted to see for myself if looks matter, and I felt designing a fake online profile would provide the answer.
I know for a fact looks matter.
Read on.
I attached three pics of a man from hotornot.com whomI felt women would easily consider to be exceptionally handsome. I wrote a very condescending and offish profile to accompany those handsome pics. Basically, I wanted the guy in the fake profile to be exceptionally handsome, wealthy ($75,000 minimum annual salary), and stoned d1ckhead. A really hot guy with absolutely no personality whatsoever…A very NOT-so-noce guy!
I wanted to see if women were shallow enough to take the bait fir such a handsome jerk, and by God, most of them have!
To date, 2,931 women have viewed the fake profile. Unlike my actual profile, the majority of the fake profile women viewers look downright stunning and hail from distinguished and/or stable financial backgrounds, and I receive emails from some downright stunning women EVERY DAY.
Basically, the women who respond to the hot guy are cut from a better cloth: They’re prettier and richer.
Just last night, the fake profile received an attachment of a woman's breasts pressed against the glass shower; her left nipple was pierced, and she attached a note: "Too bad you don't like it.
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()
" (I explained I would not respond to emails from women whom were tattooed or featured unconventional piercings ((see entire text of email below)).
Unlike my actual profile, the fake profile receives a wink or two every day from HB7's and above. It's like UG and fatties know better to reply to this guy BECAUSE HE'S GOOD LOOKING AND LOOKS MATTER!!
Here's the exact text of the fake profile:
**NOTE: Do NOT wink or email me if you ascribe to any of the following:
*Have or are aspiring to have tattoos or unconventional piercings...I will not respond to you if you express an appreciation for them or if your profile lists any of these items as a "turn-on." Nothing personal, but you must realize I want no part of a woman who conforms to such silly societal fads...remember what's "cool" today is not necessarily considered en vogue tomorrow.
*Are in anyway affiliated, employed, or apathetic with pharmaceutical manufacturers, sales, or distributers. I believe such to be immoral, as these agents target corporate profit over individual well being.
*Hold a legal position within the privatized sector; I consider such individuals to target personal greed over individual well being. (Think about it: Why are there no lawyer commercials aimed at women whose husbands abandon them?)
*Refuse to split the bill on dating-related activities. (sigh) Frankly, I'm shocked that many women I've dated lately still expect the man to pay for everything. LOL. We live in an equal society, so I treat women equally. I understand most men are willing to cater to women (particularly if she's especially physically attractive); know that I'm not one of them; I don't care how physically attractive you are or how used you are to getting your way. If you are on date with me, please pay for your half.
If you don't understand my reasoning regarding the above scenarios, that should tell you from the outset we're not a match, so email the next guy, please. Don't waste my time.
I will reject your message on the spot if you are aligned with ANY of the above scenarios.
Thanks.
I am an honest and forthwright gentleman who leads a very fulfilling and fast-paced life. I am stable in my career and would prefer a woman of the same. I prefer a woman who is active, considerate, humble to a point, and inherently nurturing.
***
Gentleman, this looks debate needs to be put to rest. If you actually believe looks aren't important, you're in la la land. Just create a fake profile on match.com and see for yourself how shallow women actually are.
Unless you’re rich or good looking, you will not fvuck a HB 8-10.