Lets face it people,
skip is correct and you guys are in denial. :rock:
Your theory that looks dont matter much holds no water!
it fails to explain real life observations. Id call that not holding water, wouldnt you? I thought so.
Skip's theory successfully explains most if not all real life observations. Now I would call that a water holder, lol. :cheer:
When you take into account what it states:
-Women require a guy to be good looking or nothing will work, nothing except attempting rape.
-Women's tastes vary, (explaining why "ugly guys" manage to get a hot chick)
-Men are poor judges of a guys looks (explaining why many of the eyewitnesses of ugly guys with hot girls have no credibility.)
lets look at the evidence:
-we have seen guys who could be considered ugly or average with hot chicks,
but women's variance in their tastes and the fact that men are poor judges account for these observations.
-What we have
not seen are unambiguous, undeniable cases where the guy HAS to be seen as ugly to the girl hes banging.
Cases where womens variance and mens poor judgement fail to explain. THese would be examples where theres some fatassed blob with a pizza face, big nose, big ears, hairy all over his body like a ****ing bear, short as fvck, and balding with a hot ***** where money or a calculated motive on the woman's behalf has been ruled out. These cases would give skips theory trouble. But the fact is, we have not observed these cases, so therefore skips theory correctly explains all observations. According to the theory, such cases should never exist, we dont observe them, so therefore skip has consistency my friends!
But when we look over at the "looks dont matter" theory, we should be seeing plenty of these cases. I mean, there has to be some ugly as ****, fatassed blobs with pizza faces and hairy bodies, short as ****, balding etc. undeniably ugly to anyone,
but have game, and therefore would be getting chicks, becuase looks dont matter (they got game, and get chicks this way). We should be seeing some of these cases if the "looks dont matter" were true.
But we dont! How is it possible for average or good looking guys to have good game, oh but ugly guys dont? Ugly guys are just as likely to have good game as a good looking one, so we should expect to see some fugly guys getting hot chicks do to their game.
But we dont. THis seriously gives the "looks dont matter" theory trouble.
Also, we look at many hot women with boyfriends, pretty much all of them agree that their BF is good looking, even If us guys disagree. If you dont beleive me, I dare you to poll as many hot chicks you can who have BFs and ask them if they think there BF is good looking, THey will all say yes. If the "looks dont matter" theory were true, we would expect only a minority of these women to say yes since only a minority of guys are good looking, and the rest would say "no" since most guys are not good looking, and would have to have gotten these hot chicks using game. But since pretty much all hot chicks agree that their boyfriends are atleast cute, this really gives the "looks dont matter" theory serious trouble.
Okay, so lets look at the score here:
Observations are consistent with skips theory.
Observations fail with "looks dont matter" theory.
Give it up people. accept it, looks matter. women are just like men in this respect. You gotta be attractive in their eyes.