The issue is, women will end up fvcking the stud/player in her early years. When she realizes that these men have nothing going for them and don't want to get married, they decide to draw in some poor schmuck who didn't get sh!t when he was younger to fvck her used up vagina. He thinks he found 'the one' from lack of experience, and the woman makes him propose without him realizing it. Now the player isn't getting any play now while the 'nice guy' is. Once she feels like she has him locked down completely, she ends up cheating on one her husband with some other dude who makes more money and is better looking. She fvcks up her marriage because she thinks she can lock down this new and richer guy, but he only wanted sex and now has to deal with some divorced cvnt b!tching at him for playing her and getting a fvck ton of flak from the media. Now the woman doesn't have anyone, but the state forces her man to still provide for her.
Out of this typical situation, which of the 3 men win? Trick question, none of them win because the woman does. Life is hard to be a man in today's society.
Son, you have a good mind. It's good to be aware. But don't spend your 20s and 30s becoming an extremist like some men in the Manosphere. Hold a balanced, healthy view. Yes, many women are not quality material worth LTRing, especially the hotter ones where quality is extremely scarce.
But, by all means, this does not mean you or the market is fvcked. Just be the greatest DoubleGreatest you can be and you will transcend these men and capitalize in a market where some men cannot.
I, for one, had never had problems getting into back-to-back quality LTRs with great women. One LTR lasted 10 years, others a few.
The end goal is not "happily ever after" and stagnate. Life is a journey. You are here to learn, evolve, transcend. People are brought to your life for a specific purpose, and when that purpose is served, it's time for you to move on. Appreciating and understanding this rudimentary concept will give you some color through the often bilateral lenses of life.
Relationships are temporal. They always were, but social constructs in the old day did not allow breaks. But if you were not growing in a relation, did it make sense to force two people to remain an item? I would argue that relations dissolving is healthy, as in an unpropitious relation, we stagnate; we fail to evolve, and failing to evolve abrogates Nature's plan. Antipodally, I would encourage breakups, as they are the necessary catalyst to spawn Nature's elaborate agenda (which is transcendence of the people), forcing people to look deep within themselves and improve. Successful relations don't encourage growth; failed ones do. Don't think myopically, and incorporate the wisdom, not the deleterious emotions which often accompany it.
