Crying and playing a victim and lying and attacking me at the same time. :crackup:
Still you were wrong on misandry and the OP made you look like a fool. Now you use feminist tactics like making up things, lying, crying, playing a victim, and shaming. Nothing is about you like you are claiming. You were wrong and made the fool on misandry being too sensitive to take any critical advice. Weak beta man.Danger said:This very quote is an example, saying I am crying and playing victim. But the real attacking is that you are making this whole discussion about me personally and not the topic..
Danger said:And still you attack me personally..
Now you attack me personally in feminist language. You are just like a feminist incapable of any logic or reasoning thinking you are always right and everyone is attacking you. What a liar you are. Lying like a feminist say I attack you when you attack me and others here. Making up things I never said to fit your misandry narrative. Feminists do exactly that.Danger said:But then, you're a mouth-foaming feminist who declares the man evil whether he is being smashed by the mirror or the one doing the smashing. Take a bon-bon and calm yourself down sweetheart..
Danger said:you attack the man with shaming weapons.
What is this? You attack me with shaming weapons like a feminist. Liar I attacked nobody. You were made to be the fool and got mad when I said so.Danger said:But then, you're a mouth-foaming feminist who declares the man evil whether he is being smashed by the mirror or the one doing the smashing. Take a bon-bon and calm yourself down sweetheart.
I am attacking nothing. Now you want there to be misandry in the hypothetical since you believe in everything to be misandry and lost your misandry claim with the OP. I see nothing but shaming weapons from you.Danger said:These are feminist tactics used to kill messengers instead of discussing the uncomfortable realities.
This is why you desperately attack the role-reversal question I pose with comments like this....
You desperately avoid the topic and instead attack the man in the hypothetical. Which is the real definition of irony, because when the roles are reversed, you attack the man with shaming weapons while at the same time declaring "no misandry"..
Liar. I never said I said I'm ok with charges. She pressed the charges against him. He has to defend those charges. Making up lies about me.Danger said:Let's put this into perspective. The man defends himself against a woman smashing a mirror on his head and you are ok with the charges pressed against him..
The man is a beta loser for smashing a mirror on a woman's head out of anger. I assume you do that since it is so important to you angering you so much. So we now know you can't keep your cool letting women affect you that bad. Definition of a beta man that can't hold in his emotions just like the feminist you are.Danger said:But when the roles are reversed the man smashing the mirror on the woman is a beta loser. In both cases it's all about how bad the man is. How can you give any sort of credible point of view when that is your perception of reality?.
Courts do not declare anything not til the defense rests and evidence is in. You were wrong about misandry and still look like a fool crying and now lying.Danger said:Courts, media, public opinion all declare many things when not all evidence is available. But more importantly, and as I already stated, the OP gave the impression the detective and DA had the evidence and yet the charge still stood, so more than appropriate to make the call I did..
Calm yourself since you are the one who has your panties in a wad throwing a fit like an irate woman. You are making a fool of yourself.Danger said:But then, you're a mouth-foaming feminist who declares the man evil whether he is being smashed by the mirror or the one doing the smashing. Take a bon-bon and calm yourself down sweetheart..