So you base your entire criticism of me on an ASSUMPTION that I believe Bill's "looks" are the sole reason this chick burned him? And furthermore, the logic behind your ASSUMPTION is supported by nothing more than an anthology of my posts on this board, most of which are over two years old?
I can see where you would get confused, but let me clear things up:
First of all, I don't recall mentioning anything about Bill's "looks" being a factor behind this girl's flake-out. I DO recall mentioning phone calls, and messages, but never "looks." On the contrary, I would imagine that she probably found Bill's looks perfectly acceptable, judging by the physical contact that took place between them.
Since you are so familiar with my posts, you may have noticed the myriad of occassions where I have clearly explained that ATTRACTION is a whole made of many parts. Only one of those many parts is "looks," albeit a part of undeniable significance. In Bill's case right here, it wasn't the "looks," it was everything else. Simply put, if Bill were baking a cake called ATTRACTION, he had the flour, but not the eggs, milk, or sugar.