baggy pants on a woman

[BaronOfHair]

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results

Yeah, such as pursuing women much older than yourself, when at least one in that age bracket has already informed you: "Most of us have no desire for younger men"


"Why focus on young broads when I know there's a high chance I'm going to chicken out once they offer me sex?"

Gorging yourself on MGTOW content has misled you into believing that you have no choice BUT to b-tch out, the minute the going gets tough, then film a lengthy YouTube video on the many ways Gynocentrism f-cked you up. Same way Feminism scammed many women into believing that every bad date or unpleasant interaction with men they have isn't attributable to either the dude being psychologically disturbed or run of the mill societal bias(News flash: Our society is filled with prejudices and biases towards damned near everything), but this amorphous and invisible force known as The Patriarchy

 

[GoodMan32]

Because it's 2024, soon to be 2025. Gals born in the first of year of the prior MILLENNIUM's second to last decade have frequently birthed/sometimes even more or less raised multiple children, and have no desire to take on another child as a lover

As someone else has mentioned to you prior, you're(understandably)thinking about dating and mating the way men do I.E. Youth is not only not an obstacle but indeed desirable on a mate. This ain't how most women function though. I encourage you to Google the now-exhaustive research on this subject for yourself: Most women prefer fellas older than themselves

I've seen statistics on marital age gaps. I'm well-aware the typical woman prefers an older man.

I just looked up the numbers to refresh my memory. In 85% of married American heterosexual couples, the husband is either the same age or older (for the purposes of the study, the husband can be up to 2 years younger and still be seen as "same age")

Ok, so that still leaves 15% of married couples where the woman is willing to be with a man more than 2 years younger than her. Even if a minority, 15% still translates into millions of broads.

Also worth taking into account is the fact cougar couples don't tend to get married (in other words, a marriage study doesn't take the full picture into account in terms of how many broads are willing to go younger)

As for a 1980-born broad not wanting to go for kids, 33 isn't a kid (in the song Charlie's Got The Blues, they even have a line that goes "you're not a kid at 33").

I could understand a 1980-born broad thinking 20 is too young (as there's a high chance she has kids that age). I just think (as I said on a past post) the man's age really shouldn't matter once he's 30+ (ironically though, it's been said before on this forum that an early 20s boytoy has a better shot with a 45 year old broad than a 30-something man does)

 

[GoodMan32]

So it's attention you crave.

Attention is one of the things I crave, yeah.

 

[GoodMan32]

Yeah, such as pursuing women much older than yourself, when at least one in that age bracket has already informed you: "Most of us have no desire for younger men"

If you're talking about the woman I think you're talking about, she also gave me pointers to maximize my odds of getting into an older woman's pants.

Besides, even if a young woman is more likely to accept my advances, that's meaningless if I'm going to chicken out once we're naked in bed.

Furthermore, I'm not 100% convinced I'd have better luck with a young woman anyway. I mentioned on a recent post that (in my experience) older broads have generally been way handsier with me than young broads (which makes me wonder if there's something about me that serves as a magnet for older broads/repels young broads)

If I recall, it's been said on this forum that young broads are typically handsy. In which case, the fact they generally haven't been handsy with me is very telling.

 

[BaronOfHair]

Ok, so that still leaves 15% of married couples where the woman is willing to be with a man more than 2 years younger than her

15% of those living in West Baltimore may have spent 8 decades or more there, without ending up with a gut full of lead, stabbed in the chest multiple or times, or carjacked. These odds remain lousy though

 

[GoodMan32]

Observation on the topic of Gen Z wearing baggy pants:

I went to my usual cafe this morning. A girl who looks college-aged was working. Her pants were baggier than mine. That's just not right.

She's attractive. What a shame the baggy pants ruin her good looks.

 

[GoodMan32]

I doubt she feels that way when she strips down to her lingerie for her lover whose attention she desires.

And every day she blesses her baggy pants for dissuading shallow creeps like you from approaching her.

My shyness, combined with the fact she's way younger than I prefer, prevents me from approaching her (other than to place my drink order)

The baggy pants are simply an added reason to refrain from approaching her.

She's worn tight jeans before. She has a nice backside.

 

[GoodMan32]

That's why she wearing them doofus, she wants some reprieve from the creeps constantly checking out her tight denim buns.

I know broads wore baggy pants in the 90s.

That being said, by 2003 (when I first started checking out backsides), tight jeans were universal among broads. It wasn't until 2017 or so that baggy pants on broads became a trend again.

Interesting how getting their tight denim backsides checked out wasn't problematic from 2003-17, then somehow became a "problem"

What's next, broads wearing winter coats year round to hide the outline of their melons?