baggy pants on a woman

[BaronOfHair]

"...but femininity can encompass a wide range of styles"

And some of those styles enhance a woman's appeal more than others

 

[GoodMan32]

I don’t prefer it, but I don’t discriminate. Some people I’ve been with wear them occasionally, like to a concert or to the grocery store instead of sweatpants. They don’t wear them constantly.

Fashion is cyclical. They were once in style in the 90s or early 2000’s. I can’t remember which.

Actually, I’ve changed my stance on the topic. What began as a #MeToo movement has evolved into a trend. People might wear oversized jackets and pants because they’re fashionable or simply because they find them comfortable. Men are also embracing these looks. Ultimately, there’s no need to question why people dress a certain way; it comes down to personal taste, which is subjective—unless you believe it’s a way to keep certain men at bay, like men that despise those pants, in which it might be true.

Yeah, I've noticed Gen Z young men wearing baggy pants too.

I don't even like to wear baggy pants as a guy.

I once wore baggy pants (they were in style, for a guy at least, in my younger days). By the time I was halfway through high school, however, tighter pants came into style. My pants then tightened (by college, I was wearing the skintight drainpipe jeans).

Even though I don't wear the drainpipe jeans anymore (I don't know if they even make drainpipe jeans for a guy anymore), I'm never going back to baggy pants. Looking back on my 12-15 year old self, I see how sloppy and ridiculous baggy pants looked (they look equally ridiculous on the young folk embracing baggy pants in the current year)

My point? Since baggy pants are a bad look even for a guy, it goes without saying that it's a bad look on a broad.

 

[GoodMan32]

I agree that clothing plays a role in gender expression, but femininity can encompass a wide range of styles. Women might choose baggy clothing for various reasons, including comfort, personal taste or current fashion trends, and that doesn’t make them any less feminine.

The question though is: Why would fashion trends embrace such a bad look (especially a bad look that used to be in style...and went out of style for good reason)?

The 90s should have made us learn from the error of a woman wearing baggy pants

 

[Clockwerk50]

And some of those styles enhance a woman's appeal more than others

This one in particular emphasizes the torso.

 

[BaronOfHair]

This one in particular emphasizes the torso.

View attachment 13141

View attachment 13142

Her lower half would be far more alluring, if her pants were tighter

 

[Clockwerk50]

The question though is: Why would fashion trends embrace such a bad look (especially a bad look that used to be in style...and went out of style for good reason)?

The 90s should have made us learn from the error of a woman wearing baggy pants

(5) Why does some fashion repeat while others fad? | LinkedIn

Yeah, I've noticed Gen Z young men wearing baggy pants too.

I don't even like to wear baggy pants as a guy.

I once wore baggy pants (they were in style, for a guy at least, in my younger days). By the time I was halfway through high school, however, tighter pants came into style. My pants then tightened (by college, I was wearing the skintight drainpipe jeans).

Even though I don't wear the drainpipe jeans anymore (I don't know if they even make drainpipe jeans for a guy anymore), I'm never going back to baggy pants. Looking back on my 12-15 year old self, I see how sloppy and ridiculous baggy pants looked (they look equally ridiculous on the young folk embracing baggy pants in the current year)

My point? Since baggy pants are a bad look even for a guy, it goes without saying that it's a bad look on a broad.

I wear straight jeans and prefer them to slim fit. The point is, that’s what’s in style for the younger generation. Trends like septum piercings and broccoli hair are popular, and for many young people, it’s all about “when in Rome, do as the Romans do.”

While I understand that these trends appeal to some, everyone has their own preferences. For example, I’m not a fan of septum piercings, but I don’t complain about it. I respect that some people like them. If I were to date someone with a septum piercing, I might playfully suggest they take it out, as I believe a lighthearted approach would be more effective for them to take my lead. However, I doubt I would date someone with a septum piercing in the first place.

 

[BaronOfHair]

There are signs https://nypost.com/2024/08/02/lifes...-xcx-billie-eilish-rebellious-and-subversive/ that things are changing

 

[Clockwerk50]

Her lower half would be far more alluring, if her pants were tighter

I doubt her boyfriend minds since he gets to smash it and see her without those pants. Plus, it seems she doesn't wear them all the time.

@GoodMan32 How about we stop judging others for what and why they do and wear? It’s really petty. Instead, let’s focus on something more productiv like doing push-ups or pull-ups right now. Sound good?

 

[GoodMan32]

(5) Why does some fashion repeat while others fad? | LinkedIn





I wear straight jeans and prefer them to slim fit. The point is, that’s what’s in style for the younger generation. Trends like septum piercings and broccoli hair are popular, and for many young people, it’s all about “when in Rome, do as the Romans do.”

While I understand that these trends appeal to some, everyone has their own preferences. For example, I’m not a fan of septum piercings, but I don’t complain about it. I respect that some people like them. If I were to date someone with a septum piercing, I might playfully suggest they take it out, as I believe a lighthearted approach would be more effective for them to take my lead. However, I doubt I would date someone with a septum piercing in the first place.

You're right, it could simply be a matter of "when in Rome, do as the Romans do" (to explain why the younger generation wears baggy pants)

My own transition to tighter pants as a teen was (in retrospect) probably influenced by the "when in Rome" factor.

I guess since I'm now 33, I'm less susceptible to "when in Rome" trends.

 

[GoodMan32]

There are signs https://nypost.com/2024/08/02/lifes...-xcx-billie-eilish-rebellious-and-subversive/ that things are changing

I remember the whale tail trend being super popular when I was in 8th grade.

 

[RickTheToad]

You know, just 10 years ago, the clothing that some of these females are wearing would had caused them to be either cited or arrested for indecent exposure. While I am not a fan of baggy jeans, females wearing skin tight and see through clothes is wrong on many levels.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

While I am not a fan of baggy jeans, females wearing skin tight and see through clothes is wrong on many levels.

I think they should all go Godiva so men can work on their self-control.

 

[GoodMan32]

I found a promising article:

Millennial explains to Gen Z the true meaning of low-rise jeans

The woman wanted to talk about a controversial fashion staple of the early 2000s.

www.newsweek.com

Apparently the low rise jeans of the early 2000s are the latest old trend to come back into style. Hopefully this means the trend of a modern-day young woman rocking the baggy pants of the 90s has died out (the article even mentions the 90s mom jeans Gen Z trend)

I speak for a lot of men when I say low rise jeans are a good look on a woman. Even if the low rise jeans Gen Z is bringing back aren't as low rise as the early 2000s low rise jeans, still a step in the right direction.

 

[BaronOfHair]

I found a promising article:

Millennial explains to Gen Z the true meaning of low-rise jeans

The woman wanted to talk about a controversial fashion staple of the early 2000s.

www.newsweek.com

Apparently the low rise jeans of the early 2000s are the latest old trend to come back into style. Hopefully this means the trend of a modern-day young woman rocking the baggy pants of the 90s has died out (the article even mentions the 90s mom jeans Gen Z trend)

I speak for a lot of men when I say low rise jeans are a good look on a woman. Even if the low rise jeans Gen Z is bringing back aren't as low rise as the early 2000s low rise jeans, still a step in the right direction.

Perhaps they can also resurrect a love of comedy and a willingness to defend it ferociously, even when not personally finding the joke all that funny. A return to the social atmosphere we enjoyed during even the late 90s-early 2000s, imperfect though it was, would be most welcome

 

[GoodMan32]

Perhaps they can also resurrect a love of comedy and a willingness to defend it ferociously, even when not personally finding the joke all that funny. A return to the social atmosphere we enjoyed during even the late 90s-early 2000s, imperfect though it was, would be most welcome

Was a kid in that era; agree it'd be an awesome era to return to in some ways (if we're lucky, perhaps the dating/sex marketplace could return to that era)

I guess I was born 20 years too late. If only I was 33 in 2004, I wouldn't be dealing with the oversatutation of the 2024 market.

 

[BaronOfHair]

I guess I was born 20 years too late. If only I was 33 in 2004, I wouldn't be dealing with the oversatutation of the 2024 market.

Fellas of your ilk wouldn't have had a proliferation of Incel and MGTOW forums online to retreat into, this is true

 

[characternote]

 

[SW15]

I guess I was born 20 years too late. If only I was 33 in 2004, I wouldn't be dealing with the oversatutation of the 2024 market.

Dating in 2004 was not some magical time either. You likely would have struggled as a 33 year old in 2004.

You have a lot of work to do on fixing your mindset and some other issues.

Even if you could have been 33 in 2004, I don't think the end outcome would have changed too much.

There are some things I miss about dating in 2004. When 2004 was happening, I was 20-21. There were some good elements of that time.

I can't go back to 2004 even if I wanted to do that. I need to create solutions for the present time, not daydream about a period that I can't re-create now.

 

[GoodMan32]

Fellas of your ilk wouldn't have had a proliferation of Incel and MGTOW forums online to retreat into, this is true

More importantly, even though online dating existed in 2004, we weren't yet at the point where broads could get thousands of suitors right after setting up a profile.

 

[GoodMan32]

Dating in 2004 was not some magical time either. You likely would have struggled as a 33 year old in 2004.

You have a lot of work to do on fixing your mindset and some other issues.

Even if you could have been 33 in 2004, I don't think the end outcome would have changed too much.

There are some things I miss about dating in 2004. When 2004 was happening, I was 20-21. There were some good elements of that time.

I can't go back to 2004 even if I wanted to do that. I need to create solutions for the present time, not daydream about a period that I can't re-create now.

I'm not saying I would have slayed at 33 in an alternative universe where I was born 20 years sooner.

I just think I would have had better luck than I do as a 33 year old in 2024.

I've shared the story on here about a 23 year old hottie at a bar taking a liking to me when I was 30 (and that's despite the fact swipe apps were well underway by the time I was 30). Imagine how much more often stuff like that would happen with me if broads didn't have swipe apps to fall back on.