Projection? Stating some home truths is hardly "crying" gaylan. Are you running out of sh!t to say?Jaylan said:
Yeah like even 1860 America it was multicultural. Cry moar. 2014 Ferguson cry moar. Meanie frat boys. Cry cry.Jaylan said:Again,
Because that nation was always multicultural just like the USA. And its going to stay that way for as long as the nation exists.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
You do realize there were tens of thousands (millions?) or Africans and Indians in the United States at the time or it's founding. And that a good portion of the land that became the United States had tens (hundreds?) of thousands of Mexicans living in it right? That's the very definition of multicultural and America has always been multicultural and that's been it's strength.( . )( . ) said:No it wasn't. It was predominantly Europeans all of whom shared similar IQ's and K-selected life ideologies as the host populace. Was nothing like this atomized multi-kulti poz we have today, wouldn't even have been possible to build and sustain a leading higher civilization if it was. Stop BSing.
Btw a lot of Americans enjoy different countries and cultures. It used to be called travelling. On the plus side I'm glad we've proved you don't "love your country" and now we're up to you "liking" it ....If we just had a few more non-whites of course.
And yet you seem to be struggling to grasp that it was still 90% white just 70 odd years ago. It wasn't the same disconnected multi-kult dystopia we see today no matter how hard you wish it was.FairShake said:You do realize there were tens of thousands (millions?) or Africans and Indians in the United States at the time or it's founding.
Ironically says the dude who was just caught out in a lie. "I love my country"....except not really because it's still too whiteFairShake said:And your argument about "love" vs. "like" is the kind my daughter would've had with me a couple years ago when she was 7.
http://imgur.com/LnY2QJHJaylan said:One can defend their tribe without the hyperbolic and usually outright obvious anti-minority rhetoric that is constantly posted here.
Absolutely not. There were ZERO blacks when the Colony was started. There was a peak percentage ~19% of black population in 1790 (700,000), but they were mostly in the south. No one denies the US has always been about 15% black, but multiculturalism is a 1960's and onward policy. There were a few thousand Amerindians but they were living in completely separate nations and were at war. There were no Mexicans to speak of, only a few thousand subjects of Spain during the time in parts of the southwest. Everything you've said is incorrect and meaningless. You need to read about the demographics from 1600-1960, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_racial_and_ethnic_demographics_of_the_United_States#White_.28non-Hispanic.29.FairShake said:You do realize there were tens of thousands (millions?) or Africans and Indians in the United States at the time or it's founding. And that a good portion of the land that became the United States had tens (hundreds?) of thousands of Mexicans living in it right? That's the very definition of multicultural and America has always been multicultural and that's been it's strength.
What's the cause of action here? I just don't see it. I don't see any grounds to sue that has any chance of winning. Even if they are trying to fight a PR battle, they're only digging a deeper hole for themselves.dasein said:Always interesting to see that as the left considers it, free speech is only -their- speech, all others are suspect. Interesting to see the extent to which emotions trump our foundational civil rights and the rule of law whenever someone says something people don't like.
I'm not the lawyer but constitutional law experts say the cause to action is OU is a state actor and cannot infringe or impose consequences on free speech per the 1st amendment except for very specific and narrow exceptions. The Supreme Court and other courts have ruled that previously. Also due process rights and equal protection are being violated.Bible_Belt said:What's the cause of action here? I just don't see it. I don't see any grounds to sue that has any chance of winning. Even if they are trying to fight a PR battle, they're only digging a deeper hole for themselves.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/03/...-to-sue-university-and-president-david-boren/
SAE’s Oklahoma chapter — angry at being ‘tarred and feathered’ — plans to sue university
The simplest answer is, ironically, 42 USC S. 1983 under the Ku Klux Klan Act. I suspect that SAE will be seeking primarily injunctive relief, and individual students could likely seek monetary damages. Also read the case I linked earlier seeking injunctive relief.Bible_Belt said:What's the cause of action here? I just don't see it. I don't see any grounds to sue that has any chance of winning. Even if they are trying to fight a PR battle, they're only digging a deeper hole for themselves.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
If this white guy had been carrying a gun, there would be one less 3rd world thug to deal with. I'm starting to think that's the best way to deal with this stuff. The cops will never find the guy.Stagger Lee said:Meanwhile in Jaylan's multicultural paradise of NY:
A young, white couple were walking down the street around 2:00 am in Queens, when a Latino couple crossed the street and got behind them. Then the male Latino yelled “I’m going to kill you white boy,” in Spanish, and attacked the 24-year old white male victim from behind.
He slashed the victim's throat and then ran off.
It's all good though, since the victim was white this time.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/man-slashed-throat-apparent-hate-crime-queens-article-1.2148582
That's been my point. Now you admit it. Multiculturalism leads to thugs and gangs of all backgrounds. Albanians just like latinos are both still ethnic groups and are not really traditional immigrants.Jaylan said:EDIT - And as someone familiar with Ridgewood Queens, there are thugs of all backgrounds. When I was in high school there was a gang roaming around called ABI, Albanian Boys Incorporated. And ABI beefed with everyone. So quit your race bullsh!t.
True. I bet it's hard to get concealed handgun permit in NYC though. I'm not sure what the authorities there do to you if you defend yourself with hand gun without a CC permit, probably about as bad as death. It's a pain carrying a gun all the time and you need eyes in the back of your head. According to liberals multiculturalism+gun control=win :cheer:.speed dawg said:If this white guy had been carrying a gun, there would be one less 3rd world thug to deal with. I'm starting to think that's the best way to deal with this stuff. The cops will never find the guy.
If my passive aggressive poopy-talk translator is working correctly I think what gaylan is trying to say is he's wishing ill will toward dudes who dare to quote crime statistics.Jaylan said:Itd be better if guys like him targeted fellow worthless people, namely the big mouth e-racists that are so brave online.
Nah, Im saying that I know for a fact that big talkers online are quiet in real life...and that internet big mouths tend to sh!t breaks in tough real life situations.b!tch tits said:If my passive aggressive poopy-talk translator is working correctly I think what gaylan is trying to say is he's wishing ill will toward dudes who dare to quote crime statistics.
Crime stats be rayciss.