Jaylan said:
How many Asians are living in poverty in the USA? Not many bucko. But if I were to look at crime stats for the poorer parts of Asia (south east Asia), those countries are definitely not as a safe as first world Asian nations or Americam!lk sacks said:
Ah yes, using "science" to further racial claims. Favorite pastime of the idiotic web racist.
Sh!tlib poopy-talk translator 5000:Jaylan said:
"
Yep, THAT is the problem. Not black thugs. It's guys like me, running around raping, pillaging and murdering. Yep. World would be better off without me and Tits, I guess you'd rather have a few more Michael Browns running around.Jaylan said:
So you are admitting you are averse to logic. I think that just about sticks the fork in you, Mr. Emotional.Jaylan said:
Bigots are as useful as criminals. In other words, both are useless and provide nothing of worth to society. And why are you bringing up black people again? When the "thug" Stagger brought up was a Latino in Ridgewood Queens ?speed dawg said:
Since when is hdb and evo-psych at all accepted as credible science in the scientific community? The methods of evaluation, the interpretation of data, and the conclusions drawn are largely seen as full of bias.
I wonder. Do these "reputable scientific minds"(lol) trying their hardest to deny racial differences to a dwindling host population with obvious signs of "vibrancy" fatigue have surnames ending in "berg" or "stein" by any chance?Jaylan said:
And yet you're the one continually "Umm here's why that's a problem"-ing and raging at the evil nazeeeesJaylan said:
Your favorite go-to ":shrug:" to indicate your fake nonchalance is also duly noted.If you really believe that poverty causes violent crime and hostility, then why let in 2 million immigrants every year, many of them poor, into the US? This will only increase the numbers in poverty in the US.Jaylan said:
Perhaps not when the colony started but my argument was when the United States was founded. According to your own link there were more than 450,000 Blacks in the United States at the time of it's founding. Therefore I was correct.Stagger Lee said:
There were approximately 200,000 American Indians living east of the Mississippi during the American Revolution. Undoubtedly not all of them within the colonies but most of them at least. So once again I was correct.
There were about 26,000 people of Spanish descent living in California, Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico. There were also tens of thousands of Indians who would also later be known as Mexican. There were also 48,000 Spanish in Florida and Louisiana. So, as always, I was correct.
No you weren't correct. You were implying America was the same atomized multi-kulti dystopia back then as it is today and you were rightly called out on it. Don't try and move the goal posts now.FairShake said:
( . )( . ) said:
No.
Yes.
No.
_FairShake said:
I've been saying all through this thread that blacks are essentially native to the US. It's interesting you think blacks in 1790 were the same social counterpart that they are today. You said it, 90% in the south, segregated even enslaved still counts as multicultural!FairShake said:
Again, separate, non-citizens and even at war does not mean multicultural. Or just maybe it does constitute multiculturalism to you.
They're recognized as various tribes. Indians have always fought against other Indian tribes and then whites over territory. The whole world was operating under the Right of Conquest until about the 1940's just in time to stick it to the Germans.
They were a fraction of 1 % even as late as 1850 and subjects of Spain or Indian tribes. Insignificant numbers of insignificant status to the US historically. You do realize Mexico lost the war and Mexican squatters and enemies were not US citizens? No multiculturalism.
FairShake said:
Heh someone feels a little silly after arguing (pretending) America was the same multi-kulti piece of enriched good-think back then as it is now then realized they've just spent the first half of the thread arguing America is "too white". :nervous: Woops !! You need to sort your stories out smart guy.FairShake said:
Of course it does. Especially when American music, food, politics, and religion has been profoundly influenced by them!
The problem is we have a different definition of Multicultural. Mine is the original definition, a diverse society influenced by many different cultures. That definition, the correct one, describes America perfectly right up to it's very beginning.
Thankfully it's not the 1940s and nobody buys that sh!t. Poor Nazis, so misunderstood. :crackup:
Never said they were citizens. Re-read my post. Just that they lived in what later became America before it was taken from them. And they certainly contributed to the culture of the Southwest and America as a whole. There would be no cowboy without the Mexican settlers! And that's the very American archetype.
And create even more rootless and disgruntled mystery meat Elliot Rodgers with all the usual biracial insecurities and contempt for white Europeans? Where do I sign my kid up for that?LiveFreeX said:
Yeah that's true....Or emasculated weak whytes currently being race cucked by hostile third world hordes who could give a fvck if they were on fire and in most cases would actually prefer it could just say no more housing, welfare, "education" and electricity for you and kick the lot of them out, seal up the borders and, you know... make their own women horny again. Could even go all out and kick out the "re-engineers" responsible for inciting hostility and resentment between the sexes.LiveFreeX said:
Man Boobs said:
I couldnt give two sh!ts about who white dudes choose to sleep with. It takes an insecure male to give a damn about who some woman he's not banging is screwing.LiveFreeX said:
This you kind of passive aggressively pretending not to be angry again gaylan? Btw I love "diversity" gaylan. Hence why I don't want a (forced) coffee colored dystopia for white and only white countries. Be pretty unexciting huh?Jaylan said:^"waaaaaah me no like diversity ".
Strange then why you should buck for endless immigration into AmericaJaylan said:
The mysteries abound!!lulz when cult-Marx buzzwords fail you try the appealz to the feeelz. "It's all goooood. Just let them find lurrrrrve" kind of hard to be the chilledbrah when you're a rabid anti-white you phoney dingbat. It's called congruence.Jaylan said:
".