Existence is rational? Just because we make rationalisations doesn't mean existence is. Science is fallible. Indeed, any good scientist would tell you that even with all the knowledge in the world, it is intuition which tends to guide their discoveries. Even maths is an art in its upper levels. And especially psychology - you can read all the textbooks you want but if anything they can make you LESS capable of reading people; intuition beats it every time.azanon said:I would say your base assumption is wrong. Existence is very rational. I have a Masters in "rational". If the world wasn't predictable, repeatable, testable, explainable (Darwinian), etc. we'd have to close up our modern-day science classrooms. Psychology (RT's field) also relies a lot on studying "norms" and comparing "outliers" (those who act "abnormally") to the general rule.
The exception is the irrational, and if there should be any world religion, it should be nihilism. I'm more a fan of "humanism" though, since it has a positive spin to it.
Don't tell me quantum mechanics is rational. Physicists have found a level of reality where unpredictability and unknowability are PROVEN. Basically -- though they're trying to play it down -- they've realised that the universe just doesn't fit into their neat little boxes.
Hey, I'm a big fan of science! But once you take rationalism far enough you'll realise there's a hole that just can't be filled by thought alone.