jurry said:
It really boggles the mind that you cant follow this logic.
It really does cause these guys are delusional and their fragile egos can't admit they are betas.
They talk about "feminist indoctrination" as their attack on guys who don't use verbal boundaries.
These guys are too stupid to figure out that women will still keep the men hidden from them when they set their boundaries to avoid a confrontation.
The boundaries they set aren't doing anything for them except to give them false confidence and a false sense of reality.
Women will still keep their male friends if they want to even with boundaries.
They will lie to the boyfriend agreeing to the terms keeping their male friends hidden.
Hilarious how these idiots can't figure that out.
When you get a quality respectful woman none of this is necessary cause she won't need other men when she only wants you.
Women will still have other men if they want to regardless if you set boundaries or not.
But these idiots call that straw man and can't understand that women will do that when they had no problem placating their parents and previous boyfriends to get arouund their boundaries.
sylvester the cat said:
Why the need to refer to Sooliman as Strawsooli? Why the personal insults? Does he call you 'verbioseguru'? or ''grandiloquentguru'? Is your case that flimsy?
Why are you resorting to personal insults? I know Danger is averse to personal insults. If you have a genuine case to make then make it without the personal insults. That is if you have a case to make.
It doesn't bother me one bit what they call me.
I think it's funny myself cause it shows me they are full of $hit with their useless crap boundary argument.
TarantulaHawk is just a troll who used to be The411/Demfeeelz.
A long time member emailed me and told me he has been causing problems in this forum for years as a troll.
Like I said before the boundary crew members have a super thin argument. After their argument for boundaries is picked apart they have nothing left except to make lame insults.
They are angry cause their boundary theory has been proven to be crap once again.
Danger said:
Solly is essentially a megaphone filled with strawman arguments and personal attacks.
Given Solly's predilection towards insults and inability to constructively discuss a topic, Guru's behavior should hardly be scrutinized in that interaction. Especially given that the strawman is Solly's goto position.
Says the master of contradiction (who insults everybody all the time) who lies in every post (claiming he never said it) even when he is quoted as saying it.
There is no straw man.. You claim straw man cause your argument is crap and it ran out of gas several threads ago.
Calling someone insecure for worrying about what a woman may never even do is exactly what it is. That is being insecure. And you boundary guys certainly are in that regard.
Setting boundaries makes no difference to your relationship.
When the woman is attracted to you she won't see other men. When she is no longer attracted to you she will. Setting a boundary won't stop that from happening.
That is common sense not straw man as you claim.
Setting a boundary will have no difference whether she sees other men or not. It's what she feels for you is what matters.
When she breaks your boundary you are going to have to dump her.
Not one of you boundary guys can understand that with your same repetitive false claims.
All of you boundary guys have failed marriages and relationships with boundaries.
Mauser96 said:
If a woman's behavior is unacceptable, tell her.
She either WILL comply or she won't.
Your boundary may be unacceptable to her, or she simply doesn't care if you walk. Then, she will not comply.
So you walk.
Why is this a big issue?
Not sure why it is either.
Ask the boundary crew. They are the ones who live boundaries arguing for them in every thread making it the issue.
Nobody would bring it up if it wasn't for them talking of "boundaries" in each thread.
They believe if you "set a boundary" the woman will comply to "your will" no matter what.
It's strange they believe that since they all have failed marriages/relationships with boundaries.
They all saw first hand they don't work but still argue for them.
Crazy!
zekko said:
I guess it's because some guys will defend a woman's right to keep male friends and orbiters to the death.
Nobody is defending a woman's right to keep male friends except for one person. I guess you have no idea what you're reading in these threads.
You have no problem with your woman talking to and texting other men. Aren't those "male friends" and "orbiters" she has?
I guess you're too stupid to figure out that she can still hang out with those guys at some point when they get cozy from all that talking and texting they do.
Didn't that ever occur to you? LOL
zekko said:
If I'm not mistaken, you've changed your viewpoint on this topic also, Danger?
So have you.
Danger has no viewpoint. It changes by the day so he can try to "win his boundary argument."
I don't know how many contradictions he made regarding boundaries.
His contradictions and lies are all quoted. So go back to all the old threads and count them up.