Search results

You see mismatches in the man's favor everyday, but I don't see that. More importantly I don't see younger women with older men either. You're 25 and at your peak age of youth and looks. What would you know what it's like when you're over 35?

I think if you're going to spam as many women as possible, you would eventually get some taker(s) even it used a more normal pic of yourself, and just asked if they wanted to meet for a drink. That way you wouldn't totally ruin your reputation since it would be good to get laid more than once.

As I posted in thread about looked aged, I believe women now require a man to have a certain level of physical attractiveness before they even care about the guys wealth and personality/game.

No because of your false assumption about looks I reject that women devalue looks any more than they devalue any and everything else about men. And no I don't see women dating down in looks as much as dating up. I think men underrate other men and overrate the women and themselves.

That's a good reason why I say telling your GF to 'have fun' when she tells you she's going to do something you don't want her to or is suspect isn't going to benefit you. If you tell her you are not okay with it, and she doesn't respond positively and submit then you know she's a lost cause and...

I'm not ignoring that at all. Because a woman can get sex from a guy 3 points and sometimes higher on demand, she has no utility or demand for a guy 1 point higher. If females demand males be a minimum of 6 and they see me as a or 5.5 or a 5, then they have no use for me. I probably was a 6 or...

Yes women are capricious and somewhat arbitrary when rejecting a guy. You made some good observations and points I've also came to concluded over time. A woman will reject a man's advances a large percentage of the time no matter who the guy is. Abundance of men is a big factor. The problem...

I'm glad if you have gotten more attractive to women with age and hope it's not just a belief. That's not been the case for any guy that I've know in reality much past age 35. I deal in results and facts I've observe and form beliefs around that, not want I want to believe or wish is true. No...

I just don't think it works that way. If females find your looks aren't good enough then they're just not going to acknowledge efforts to 'improve' game/personality. If age drops your appearance a point, earning more money or 'improving' your personality/game doesn't compensate. Improving looks...

That's not red pill but in line with mainstream/blue pill too. Experience lead me to reject at least a decade ago that looks/age don't matter much to women. That's why it's an old debate because reality doesn't support looks/age not mattering much to women. I was one of the early ones to say...

Yes exactly. And it appears you are out in the real world actually meeting women.You have to have the minimum level of physical/visual attraction from first sight or nothing else matters. If you don't they just won't buy anything you're selling them. Where game comes in, game got me 6 or 7 meet...

Women especially online are totally unreasonable about a guy's looks. If you don't look as good or better than your pics, never mind even with make up they rarely look as good as their pics, then they will usually be cold fish on a meet up. I think you're going to spending a lot of time playing...

I think females only count and report serious LTRs in their sex partners count. A median of 3-4 sounds like the number of serious LTR most women have. They don't count and report the much more numerous ONS, STR, FBs and FWBs they have had, since those don't 'count' as legitimate they rationalize.

You are repeating the theory, but if you're just going to tell your GF to 'have fun' whenever she proposes doing something you don't want her to or worse seems suspect then what you have is a fvck buddy relationship. There's times when you have to set boundaries and expectations. You're trying...

I think this situation was unusual that she made up a lie about what she was doing. Often the girl will tell you at least part of the truth, such as, she's going to see a 'friend' and not attempt to totally deceive you. So I can see the argument for playing along with her lie with telling her...

True, I agree. If I cooly, calmly call something out I don't like, I've called her hand and if I don't get a positive response and if it doesn't rarely or never happen again, it's time to walk. The OP was in a no win situation really, and perhaps he should've walked previously.

You got that right. I see it play out every night. Now even if they don't become instant horndogs in an obvious manner, they will sooner or later.

You're just being argumentative. Like I said, if a woman I'm dating runs something by me I don't like or suspect, I tell her I'm not cool with it. If she doesn't respect that and submit, then I know it's time to walk away. Pretty simple and it's nipped in the bud.

Well he should've walked away before this perhaps. But I still stand by that I wouldn't have said 'have fun'. I would've objected, the beans likely would've got spilled, and still could walk away. She very easily could've took the 'have fun' as she did but never told him what she was really...

Well he should've walked away before this perhaps. But I still stand by that I wouldn't have said 'have fun'. I would've objected, the beans likely would've got spilled, and still could walk away. She very easily could've took the 'have fun' but never told him what she was really doing.