GoodMan32
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2022
- Messages
- 2,001
- Reaction score
- 532
It's interesting how personality is the least influential, yet damages my SMV the most. That must mean my personality is extremely repulsive.The mindset issues are the biggest issues, and they affect behaviors. This falls under personality in "looks, money, status, personality". Although personality is the least influential variable in "looks, money, status, personality", it damages his SMV the most.
Ambition is a personality trait, but it relates to both money and status.
OP doesn't score well on any of looks, money, status, and personality attributes.
As for ambition, even if I'm lacking in ambition in many areas, there are certain areas where I'm ambitious. The fact I (10 years ago) packed whatever belongings I could fit on an airplane, then moved to a state where I knew no one, that's a sign of ambition.
The fact I've gotten on an airplane (solo) to visit places I had never been to (for no reason other than because I wanted to) shows ambition too.
Ok, you're right, you could say that learning methods to figure out how to find/identify the segment of the female population that's into me is a type of improvement.The bolded part doesn’t make sense. Wanting to learn how to identify a segment of women who are attracted to the “non-improved” version of yourself, but refusing to engage in self-improvement, is inherently illogical. The reason is simple: learning requires action and adaptation, and the very process of learning often involves improving your methods. Learning is self-improvement, and without it, you’re not truly learning or growing in a way that increases your chances of success.
Refusing to self-improve while learning to find women who are attracted to your “non-improved” self is illogical. Learning requires action and adaptation, and the very process of learning often involves improving your methods. If you’re going to a therapist, you’re already engaging in self-improvement. Without self-improvement, you’re not increasing your chances of success, and the likelihood of achieving different results remains slim.
To increase your chances of finding women interested in your non-improved self, you need to significantly increase your approach rate, directly or indirectly. With a 2% success rate, approaching 50 women gives you a 63% chance of at least one positive outcome. Timing and environment are also key, as your examples show. As I’ve mentioned before, without understanding gender dynamics or how to respond to IOIs, you’ll continue working under randomized, uncontrolled experiments.
Sadly, If you’re not willing to invest time in improving yourself, it’s difficult to expect others to dedicate their time and effort in helping you. The advice you’re receiving is offered with good intentions, but your logic is often flawed, and others are simply trying to help you see a different perspective or correct you. Relying on others to make progress while you’re not putting in the effort can place an unfair burden on them.
My general point still stands, however. I have no desire to get muscular or make more money (which are 2 of the major self-improvements that have been proposed to me on various posts)
What I'd like is for posters to take the hint that I'm not going to work out or take a promotion at my job. I'm all ears, however, for methods on how I could increase my odds of finding a woman even without doing those things.