Using the word escort also supposedly saves the guy some face; no man using prostitutes gives a flying fornication about how they feel unless the guy is delusional and thinks the chick actually is there for his sterling soul.
Civvie is a term some of us on here use for a non-prostitute.
I think a guy would have to spring for a more expensive car to maximize his sex options.
That is besides the point.
So does our friend, @GoodMan32. You both just go about it in different ways.
To be clear, what you are saying is that escorts actually help you meet civvies because you are familiar dealing with women and it resolves the thirsty desperation. What do you think would account for the 6 year gap of time?
I don't assume every woman I meet is a hoe, but if she's +30 and from dating apps, it's almost a certainty.
)
That is 27% of all women. This figure includes a lot of 60+ women. The 60+ women would likely have a much lower rate of ever using online dating at some point in their lives. There are a lot of 60+ women who have been in the same relationship for the last 20-25+ years. Their time in the same relationship predates online dating websites/the era when dating websites were stigmatized.
This is an incorrect assumption. This means that 11.7 million women between ages 30-54 have used online dating at some point in their lives. That could easily be a 38 year old woman who used an online dating website in the pre-app era when she was 25 in 2010. That type of person would have no relevance in the online dating market of 2023. That 38 year old also might not be seeking new penis in the real world either, as she might be in an extended relationship.
This is true. Even men in the 6-7.5 range on looks might need a good car to maximize sex options. That affects how much he has to pay for sex indirectly.
A conventional relationship with sex only 2 times per month is not that good. It might be considered average and might be ok with 2 participants in a marriage being 50-55+ with lower libidos. I'm 40 years old and I need sex more than 2 times in a month to consider a relationship acceptable.
www.pewresearch.org
1. the majority of 27% is made up by women who make an account out of curiosity and for validation (no intention to even go on 1st date)
They are getting laid with the 5% chad.
There is a lot of truth in both of these statements.
The default is s non-prostitute. A woman does not need to be identified as a non-prostitute. It is a given, that unless she is identified as a prostitute, she is not. There is no need for a ‘non-prostitute’ term. Woman’, unless otherwise identified as a prostitute, is a non-prostitute.
I’ve dated & LTR’d <30 year old girls I met on OLD. They were not prostitutes.I don't assume every woman I meet is a hoe, but if she's +30 and from dating apps, it's almost a certainty.
Unless she's a virgin I don't believe in her love expressions/words, the girlish demeanor and all that ... it's either a charade or a deliberate intent on her part to manipulate for various reasons. Have you seen this movie? https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096256/ It's like I have those glasses on all the time and I see the real person behind the mask (literally when they wear like 3 layers of makeup
In a normal discussion or in the general public perhaps. However, on escort review boards, there most of the members are actually dealing with prostitutes (or are curious about it), or on some threads on here, where an OP is otherwise regularly dealing with escorts frequently, then it makes more sense to to use the term civvie rather than undermining that an escort is a "real woman", or undermining that the OP had an experience with a "real women". Failing to do that, it implies the OP is dealing with "less than" a real women.
5. It only works with chads.
Yes. In that case.
