Suit yourself. In my mind, that would be exactly the point. If I was an escortceller with allot of money, I'd pay the escort to go out for dinner with me and then have fun afterwards. It's all guaranteed. I'm assuming you are on a budget with this? If I was on a budget, then I'd go out for dinner or do anything I would have planned to do with the lady, and do it by myself and bring a mobile device and headphones to zone-out if it was bothering me that much and then go there afterwards. After all, why would you care about what anyone things about you going by yourself to a dinner if you are going to visit an escort afterwards anyway? Doesn't that play with an escort afterwards more than make-up any awkwardness you might feel on a solo-date?I won't even go out for dinner this weekend. No point of going out by myself. I'm going to eat in.
I mean in the sense of being less motivated to pursuing "civvies". We've just concluded that if a "civvie" plays games with you that you can visit an escort afterwards. If you have that much control over your sexual outcomes it won't matter if she plays games with you or not because you have a plan-B.GoodMan32 said:I wouldn't say using escorts has spoiled me. Using escorts has given me what every man deserves: Getting sex without having to play a woman's stupid games.
That's not frequent enough. Lets say you had 5 high-quality rejections from "civvies" per year, and times it by 8, then that should be 40. In that case I would not say there is spoilage because you are putting a reasonable effort. When you are saying just 3 times (I'm assuming 3 different women). That suggests spoilage in terms it's affecting your motivations. Don't you think an escort visit should be earned by having rejection points with "civvies"? It makes the visit more meaningful rather than spoiling your motivation.GoodMan32 said:This was the 3rd date I've been on since discovering escorts 8 and a half years ago. Of the 3 dates, only one led to sex.
You could have gone when she wavered on the text messaging. Rather than tell her its not working out or you are not getting along, you could have used that same text and messaged an escort. Whatever right? Then circle back to her afterwards and set up a date. You know if you didn't act up like that with her, you could have had it on the second?GoodMan32 said:There's a reason I didn't go straight to an escort after striking out last weekend. Even before she mentioned wanting another dinner date this weekend, the date went well enough I was pretty confident I'd end up having another date with her. I sincerely thought I'd get sex on the 2nd date.
Tell me if I'm getting this wrong?
Agreed.GoodMan32 said:Where escortceling comes in is: Once it becomes clear there will be no sex with a civvie.
Exactly. In the future don't write anything negative to a "civvie". Just text an escort and circle back and continue setting up the date rather than saying you are not getting along. That is the abundance mindset. Someone with abundance and paid options will not tell a "civvie" they are not getting along but will text an escort instead.GoodMan32 said:And yeah, the fact I have escorts to fall back on makes me care less about striking out with a civvie.
Last edited: