Yeah, I'm on a budget. Plus, to me, going out to dinner is a social thing. If I'm by myself, I don't see a point of going out to eat.Suit yourself. In my mind, that would be exactly the point. If I was an escortceller with allot of money, I'd pay the escort to go out for dinner with me and then have fun afterwards. It's all guaranteed. I'm assuming you are on a budget with this? If I was on a budget, then I'd go out for dinner or do anything I would have planned to do with the lady, and do it by myself and bring a mobile device and headphones to zone-out if it was bothering me that much and then go there afterwards. After all, why would you care about what anyone things about you going by yourself to a dinner if you are going to visit an escort afterwards anyway? Doesn't that play with an escort afterwards more than make-up any awkwardness you might feel on a solo-date?
I mean in the sense of being less motivated to pursuing "civvies". We've just concluded that if a "civvie" plays games with you that you can visit an escort afterwards. If you have that much control over your sexual outcomes it won't matter if she plays games with you or not because you have a plan-B.
That's not frequent enough. Lets say you had 5 high-quality rejections from "civvies" per year, and times it by 8, then that should be 40. In that case I would not say there is spoilage because you are putting a reasonable effort. When you are saying just 3 times (I'm assuming 3 different women). That suggests spoilage in terms it's affecting your motivations. Don't you think an escort visit should be earned by having rejection points with "civvies"? It makes the visit more meaningful rather than spoiling your motivation.
You could have gone when she wavered on the text messaging. Rather than tell her its not working out or you are not getting along, you could have used that same text and messaged an escort. Whatever right? Then circle back to her afterwards and set up a date. You know if you didn't act up like that with her, you could have had it on the second?
Tell me if I'm getting this wrong?
Agreed.
Exactly. In the future don't write anything negative to a "civvie". Just text an escort and circle back and continue setting up the date rather than saying you are not getting along. That is the abundance mindset. Someone with abundance and paid options will not tell a "civvie" they are not getting along but will text an escort instead.
And yeah, I totally lose my motivation to pursue civvies. You're right, I can always see an escort if a civvie plays games. So I see where your logic is coming from (when you say I should pursue civvies anyway, as I at least have a plan B if nothing comes of the civvie). That being said, my success rate with civvies is too low to justify even bothering with civvies. That's why I've only been on 3 dates in the past 8 and a half years (and to answer your question, yeah, with 3 different women).
Furthermore, the amount of time I've put into civvie pursuals in the past simply isn't worth it when I know I can get a sure thing from an escort.
On the general topic of buying an escort to treat myself after striking out with a civvie, there was a time when I was 24 and I hired an escort after a dating service refused to let me join.
I guess it's too late to go back and change my behavior from Wednesday. One reason I didn't contact an escort on Wednesday, however: I really only have time for escorts on weekends.
On a prior post, I think I mentioned the woman the thread is about finally reached back out to me yesterday. The bad news, she came up with excuses when I proposed getting together this weekend. I'm done trying with her. I'm probably going to get an escort this weekend.