Well, that one worked, lol!
Here is my post (I'm not totally stunned, I usually write my posts on Word, and then transfer them).
There is a book out there called Sex and Culture which was written by JD Unwin in the 1930's. He was an anthropologist who adhered to Freudian psychology.
Mr. Unwin took it upon himself to study over 80 cultures from the past, in regard to sexuality. He wound up being very pissed off because everything because everything that he discovered completely contradicted his beliefs up until that point (Freudanism), but, unlike nitwit academics of the modern day, he had the moral fortitude to report his findings accurately, despite it contradicting with his life-long beliefs.
He discovered that "female freedom" is 100% related to sexuality (and economics). And, he discovered that female sexual freedom is anti-civilization.
You cannot "liberate" women without giving them 100% license to screw men indiscriminately. He discovered that women will not stay with one man, but, in fact, will always behave as they do today.
He discovered that divorce, child support, and alimony has existed many, many times in the past. The Babylonians had child support and divorce. (The Babylonians rose up from the ashes of the Sumeran civilization, thereby linking it to the oldest civilization known to mankind.)
He also discovered that when female sexuality/freedom peaked (as it is doing today), the civilization soon destroyed itself within but a few generations. And then, the remnants of that civilization became highly embittered towards women and were cruelly misogynistic towards them (like killing them for adultery), and this cruel misogyny would again lead to a new civilization creating itself from the ashes of the old one... and eventually, over time, the natural male's "mangina-ness" would again give women more and more freedom, and this cycle simply repeats itself, over and over again - throughout history - nearly universally. (For example - as Darius III was getting his ass handed to him by Alexander the Great, he lamented "My men have become women, and my women have become men." Feminist cultures universally die, or live as "savages." All civilizations tend to swirl towards feminism - in all of nature, the male is the servant of the female. Even with plants.)
It is the old story of the yin and yang. The one takes over the other, and then gets taken over again in a never ending cycle. (A truly "progressive" society therefore, would seek to stop this cycle at some point where both genders achieve some sort of equal fairness and happiness, while still acknowledging that certain goalposts must remain).
This stuff women are doing today is not new. It is very, very old. In fact, it seems more accurate to say that the socialization which prevented women from behaving like this has been removed - rather than women magically became like this - we are witnessing woman in all her slutty, natural glory - her "suppressors" have been removed, and THIS is natural woman - not a pretty sight, eh?
Women have always been hostile towards men. In the book of Judges, there is a woman who snuck up on her husband as he slept and drove a tent peg through his temple - just like the Mary Winkler's of today.
Joseph was falsley accused of rape by Potiphar's wife, for her own nefarious purposes, and manginas came from far and wide to defend the lying woman and toss the man in prison, just as we do today.
Belfort Bax, a British anti-feminist writer during the time of the suffragettes and beyond (my great great great grandpa?), wrote much about female behaviour. He noted that as soon as the first female judges took to the bench, they instantly shifted the blame from of prostitution away from the soliciting prostitute, and onto the consumer male, and females felt the males shoudl be punished just as heavily as the prostitute, or more. (Kinda like treating the guy who buys and smokes a mere joint as an equal criminal as the guy who grows and sells it - and makes money from it). Mr Bax also noted that everytime a female judge made such a claim, that there were no shortage of manginas in the gallery who lept to their feet to cheer "hear, hear!"
Not much has changed.
Mr. Bax followed court cases in which he described 14 year old boys being criminally charged for having sex with 16 year old girls, who got off scott free, despite overwhelming evidence that the girl had been the sexual aggressor. Again, sound familiar?
Bax also discussed the theatrical industry of the day, and noted how it was absolutely necessary for playwrights to protray women as victims of evil males, and never the other way around - despite overwhelming evidence that this notion is anti-reality. Not much different than TV today, eh?
In the time of the suffragettes, the special dearies chanted "If women had the vote, there would be no more war." Today, this has merely morphed into "If a woman were President, there would be no more war."
The psychology is consistent, and women are always anti-male.
Tolstoy claimed that he had discovered the "secret" about women, but that he refused to share that secret with anyone until he was in his coffin, so that as soon as he said it, he could pull the lid over him and rest in peace.
One might think that Tolstloy didn't really tell us anything... or did he?
Of course, you have to stop reading the filthy censored garbage that fills academia today.
I view anything written post WWII with great suspicion. You would be shocked to find out how much of what we are talking about was general knowledge to the population a century ago... and, even moreso, when reading up on feminist (and Marxist) theorists of the past few decades, you will discover that the "intelligentsia feminists" firmly acknowledged all of these things were a reality as well - The Great Walrus, Andrea Dworkin, for example. (Most of the feminists you meet are mere useful idiots).
The thing is, because most feminists are Marxists (albeit many unwittingly), and Marxism is based firmly in Darwinism, they believe that because of evolution, that "The Truth is Relative." (As first developed by Hegel, with his Dialectical).
Because of evolution, what was true yesterday is no longer true today - agreed?
Therefore, what is true today, may not be true tomorrow.
Also, because of evolution (their theories - not mine), mankind can be forced into an evolutionary direction and the future "truths" can be altered towards man's will. This is the basis for all of our social engineering programs and those programs are the basis of Humanism (Man is God). Psycologists and Sociologists are our new priests - or voodoo doctors. We can "evolve" humans into equlity, or evolve them out of homophobia (always via totalitarianism, btw).
The Bible, of course, cannot exist within this paradigm. God is the beginning and the end, remember? He never changes. He is an absolute. If absolutes exist, then Darwinism is dead. If absolutes don't exist, then Christianity is dead. Marxism/feminism and the Bible simply cannot co-exist within the same space because they are eachother's anti-thesis. This is why there is such a war against Christianity, the foundation of our civilization. (And you don't have to be a Bible banger to recognize that - you just have to be smarter than political correctoids.)
Anyway, I could give you thousands of example that women have always been this way..., really, all you have to do is look, which most people don't - and again, look pre-WWII, and then go back to the beginning of time if you wish. Virtually everything has been censored because feminists feel that history was too misogynist. They even admit they are revising history in feminine terms, not accurate terms - remember, they are monkeying with your brain, and trying to induce psychological evolution upon you according to their Marxist agenda.
Here is a really good example of a poor man, suffering at the hands of his shrew wife - this was written 700 years ago, certainly at the "height" of the Patriarchy:
hxxp://www.theabsolute.net/misogyngy/matheol.html
This female clock is really driving me mad, for her quarrelsome din doesn't stop for a moment. The tongue of a quarrelsome woman never tires of chiming in. She even drowns out the sound of a church bell. A nagging wife couldn't care less whether her words are wise or foolish, provided that the sound of her own voice can be heard. She simply pursues her own ends; there's not a grain of sense in what she says; in fact, she finds it impossible to have a decent thought. She doesn't want her husband to be the boss and finds fault with everything he does. Rightly or wrongly, the husband has no choice: he has to put up with the situation and keep his mouth shut if he wants to remain in one piece. No man, however self disciplined or clear sighted he may be, can protect himself adequately against this. A husband has to like what the wife likes, and disapprove of what she hates and criticize what she criticizes so that she appears to be right. So anyone who wishes to immolate himself upon the altar of marriage will have a lot to put up with. Fifteen times, both night and day, he will suffer without respite and he will be sorely tormented. Indeed, I believe that this torture is worse than the torments of hell, with its chains, fire and iron.
