Will a Rolex Get You Laid? Will a Rolex Help You Get a Longer Term Girlfriend?

[MatureDJ]

Rolex is the most likely brand to get a man laid. Rolex has the brand recognition from women.

Cartier has some brand recognition but Cartier watches are considered more appropriate for women to wear than for men to wear.

So it's OVER for SwatchCels?

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I think the biggest part of RolexMaxxing is that it's WristMaxxing, and a Rolex won't help a WristCel.

Hahahaha.
is that someone with limp wrists?

 

[SW15]

What the hell is WristCel? It's a made up term. Few watch brands are meaningful for women. Swatch isn't one of them. There are even some nice, entry-level luxury brand watches that won't help much with getting laid. These are good watches in general, but bad watches for attracting women. Rolex is the brand that has the most awareness with women. There are a number of other watchmakers that are high quality with less name recognition like Patek Phillippe and Jaeger LeCoultre.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

Rolex is the brand that has the most awareness with women. There are a number of other watchmakers that are high quality with less name recognition like Patek Phillippe and Jaeger LeCoultre.

I wear different styles mostly and some get more reactions than others. The Luminox is a very bold watch and gets more (and different) reactions than my Woodwatch. And I can imagine that a slim gold Patek Philippe displays more of a subdued elegance in contrast with s Rolex Submariner.

Another thing is that Rolex is such a status symbol that counterfeits are profitable and many Rolexes are fake, so a Rolex won't convince every woman that you're a 'high value man'.

 

[SW15]

I don't like the Rolex Submariner but others do. I tend to like Datejusts and the Day Date more.

You said it yourself. Rolex is a status symbol.

I think in order for a Rolex to be effective in seduction and in retaining a woman (if that's a goal), it has to be combined with other status symbols.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I think in order for a Rolex to be effective in seduction and in retaining a woman (if that's a goal), it has to be combined with other status symbols.

And you have to look congruent with a Rolex wearer. Or say it was a gift from your harem.

 

[babasosuave]

Swiss Watches?

 

[SW15]

I think the gold Rolexes are better for initially attracting than the steel or even two tone Rolexes. Few steel Rolexes are going to stand out nearly as much as a gold Rolex.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I think the gold Rolexes are better for initially attracting than the steel or even two tone Rolexes. Few steel Rolexes are going to stand out nearly as much as a gold Rolex.

They are also more 'bling' and 9 out of 10 are fakes, so I think if you want to attract the smarter gold diggers you should go for the more subdued subtle Rolexes.

 

[SW15]

They are also more 'bling' and 9 out of 10 are fakes, so I think if you want to attract the smarter gold diggers you should go for the more subdued subtle Rolexes.

The potential problem with that approach is that your watch goes completely unnoticed.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

The potential problem with that approach is that your watch goes completely unnoticed.

Not if you look at the time with a flourish.

 

[nicksaiz65]

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

m.youtube.com

 

[SW15]

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

m.youtube.com

Most cheap watches, even if they look good, won't get attention. You've got to get up to the Rolex class to get attention for your watch. It's also the gold Rolexes that get more attention than the steel ones. There are some very nice steel Rolexes but they don't quite stand out like a gold Rolex. The gold Rolexes also cost far more than the steel ones. The steel ones are also plenty expensive, but more of budget Rolexes.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

Most cheap watches, even if they look good, won't get attention. You've got to get up to the Rolex class to get attention for your watch.

My secondhand Promaster diver watch got me a date first day I wear it.



I bought this watch secondhand from a guy on Marktplaats (a Dutch 'craigslist') and when it arrived today I removed the metal bracelet (I don't like shackles) and put a heavy duty black and silver ZULU/NATO strap on the beast.
I went with my teenage daughter and tomcat for cheesecake and coffee at one of my regular haunts. We were the only ones except for a young man and young woman.
I think she kept staring at my beastly watch while she filmed my cat sitting on my lap and asking me for my IG. When I got home there was a message waiting for me to meet with her.
Apparently she wants to extend our conversation at my place and talk more about herself.

Maybe I should wear my Orient Flieger next time, less butch.

 

[TheGrindEqualsHappiness]

Well I suppose R helps if it gives you confidence?
And if you like to collect nice things, I bet watches are better than high end knives, or AR-15s for pulling chicks!

In a more autistic tone:
In my own experience (as masculine looking guy) when signalling more provider-value qualities (wealth, liking children or kinder side of your persona) can make chicks really light up. But remember that slipping too much into provider-frame can make power-dynamics definately sh1ttier in the beginning.
No problem here, if you have good frame control / game.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I bet watches are better than high end knives

Unless the girl is into knife play.

 

[SW15]

By the time any dude should be able to comfortably afford Rolexes (being able to buy them casually like they're candy bars), it becomes irrelevant. Having a Rolex without also having a Rolls Royce is kind of like when guys have nice cars but live in sh1t apartments. You'll initially get the attention of women, but be sniffed out in due time.

If a man has a Rolex, it needs to work in conjunction with other possessions. It needs to work with his home and car. The Rolex isn't as big of a priority as the home, its furnishings, and the car.

There's an argument that in an initial approach, a Rolex can be seen without the car or the home being seen. The Rolex serves as somewhat of a lure because a man can't take his car into the bar/mall/grocery store to attract the women.

I have heard of men who will be out in public and display their car keys with a BMW or Mercedes-Benz logo on the keys in order to attract women. That's the closest way that a man could take his car into the bar.

Using the Rolex could be a little bit more subtle than using the BMW or Mercedes-Benz logo. The gold Rolexes attract more attention than the steel ones.

 

[nicksaiz65]

If a man has a Rolex, it needs to work in conjunction with other possessions. It needs to work with his home and car. The Rolex isn't as big of a priority as the home, its furnishings, and the car.

There's an argument that in an initial approach, a Rolex can be seen without the car or the home being seen. The Rolex serves as somewhat of a lure because a man can't take his car into the bar/mall/grocery store to attract the women.

I have heard of men who will be out in public and display their car keys with a BMW or Mercedes-Benz logo on the keys in order to attract women. That's the closest way that a man could take his car into the bar.

Using the Rolex could be a little bit more subtle than using the BMW or Mercedes-Benz logo. The gold Rolexes attract more attention than the steel ones.

For me, the hierarchy would be Home > Car > Watch.

Car debt is awful. Credit card debt is even worse. In the big picture, I don’t think it’s worth putting yourself into debt to get things to impress materialistic women.

 

[SW15]

For me, the hierarchy would be Home > Car > Watch.

I agree with the hierarchy. I would put home furnishings and home electronics as a part of home. It's good to have a relatively modern TV set as the primary TV set. If a TV set gets too old but is still functional, it can be moved to another room if one's home is spacious enough. This is more difficult for the bachelor in a 1 bedroom apartment. An aging primary TV set can be moved to the bedroom, but it is less than ideal to have a TV set in the bedroom.

There are even fashion accessories that you can put ahead of a watch. Shoes for instance. You could get some Bruno Magli shoes for $300-$500 right now. A basic pre-owned steel Rolex (which won't be as effective as a gold Rolex) will run around $5,000 - $5,500 right now. Going to an upscale lounge with some Bruno Magli shoes, a solid dress shirt, and a nice pair of pants could be around $700. You could get some impressive clothes and shoes for nightlife venue game for the cost of one steel Rolex. That might even impress women more than solely the Rolex.

I don’t think it’s worth putting yourself into debt to get things to impress women.

I disagree. It depends how much debt.

Some men have two primary options in conventional dating. They can use possessions to attract women or they can go without sex. All men pay for sex indirectly in conventional dating.

If your looks are on point, you're less likely to need money game. Going from a 7 to an 8.5 on looks means you won't need to use money as much. A 7 is an above average looking guy and he'll still likely need to use money.

When a man reaches 35-40, it's more difficult to win purely on looks. Money does become more of a factor in middle age. Men can compete effectively on looks alone until about 35-40.

Starting in the 35-40 range, there are fewer men who can attract solely on looks. There are some 35+ archetypes that can compete on looks alone, but its rare and almost non-existent after 50.

Money ages better than looks.

 

[zekko]

If a man has a Rolex, it needs to work in conjunction with other possessions. It needs to work with his home and car. The Rolex isn't as big of a priority as the home, its furnishings, and the car.

It's a fairly common thing for young people to get a cool car that they can't really afford. It would be stupid to get a Rolex if you can't really afford it. That said, I would think a cool car would get you laid faster than a watch. At least a cool car can be fun, and she can share in the fun because she gets to ride in it.

I remember once I had a 4x4 truck and it was struggling to get up a snowy ramp. I kicked the four wheel drive in, and it tore right up the ramp. The girl I had with me said "I think I just got wet".