Mad Manic said:
No, in the past there was a more probable one-one map so most guys got a girl on a similar level. Because women became more promiscuous and the introduction of feminism etc., they decided to become harsher in their selection of men. So yes, they may be sluts and getting laid, but only to the top tier guys who are deemed worthy enough of their pvssy. The facts say that most men don't get laid and most women do. The distribution is right-shifted for men and relatively even for women.
That's exactly what I was going to say. The "old system" was better catered toward the average man because he would have much more choice. Since the introduction of feminism decades ago and the progression it has made, as of 2007, women DON'T need men. Women can go out and support themselves (more then ever women are taking up job positions that used to traditionally belong to men), so why do they need men? With the exception of children, women have no use for men (even though a lot of women now adays are putting off children for their careers). Since a woman has choice, women aren't going to settle for "joe average" who is no better or maybe even beneath her on the totem pole...she is going to want the top dogs. She will prostitute herself to the guys that every girl wants and wants to be seen with, but the average guy is just left with his **** in his hands. Women have made it so difficult guys have to have the looks of brad pitt, the money of warrent buffett, intelligence of einstein and social proof of george clooney. If not at least lie like a car salesman and hope you can convey that type of image.
Alot of guys are AFC's, but that is not the sole reason a lot of them are chronic masterbators. A big reason is because times have changed and women have amped up the stakes...why do you think a lot of old timers from the past generations ***** about today's generation and how assbackwards it is? Women acting like men (except without a ****) wasn't seen 30+ years ago and if it was, it would be met with shame.
Now, some might challenge me by saying "Well I know one guy who is stupid and ugly as sin and he ****s a hot woman". A guy can be the biggest mangina on the planet, but if he has money, what is he then? Huh? What is he? He's not "average" I can tell you that, he meets one of the criteria women selfishly seek out. Most couples that I have seen where there was a large disparity lookwise between the male and the female, the female was with the guy because he was either rich or came from some wealthy and recognized family. Ugly, rich and well known = great, ugly, so-so money, well known = good, averge appearance, so-so money, not very well known = chronic masterbating, sexless, mother ****er!