Originally posted by NewMan
Again very well written by PRL - But he is way off
What is "Natural"? Who defined it? and why was it defined so?
What is "right" - who defines what is right?
PRL's vision of natural and right - is what society taught him. Women should not have sex before marrage.
That my friends is religion at work.
It is not the NATURAL order of things.
Marrage is a man made ceremony. It is not natural.
Men were never designed to be with one woman and one woman alone. Men re-produce. that is our natural drive and goal. to fvck and to produce children.
Societies rules have changed that.
I have said it before - I haven't been to church since I was a child and I belong to no faith - so religion has no bearing on what I state or have stated!!! I do not know the dogmas of any religion!
Newman, as I stated - nature is what it is - we only discover the laws of nature and we do NOT create them! From Astronomy to the biological sciences to mathematical formulas to the physical sciences to music to art - these things exist without human intervention or man's doing.
Can a picture of an ice-capped mountain with a sun-lit sky with animals about in the valley alongside the stream of water be better in sight than the natural sight itself?? The laws of motion still exist whether or not we exist! We, as humans do NOT define nature – it defines us!! We are by products of the conglomerate of natural forces on earth – water, sunlight, air, vegetation and animals (for food and clothing), so on and so forth.
The earth’s rotation and movement of our galaxy are aligned in perfect harmony to sustain us naturally – thus it was obviously created for our benefit. When we think, as humans, that it is by our own doing and thinking that we are so prosperous and knowledgable, then we begin to plant the seed of our own destruction.
Yes, look at nature for guidance to know and determine that which is true and right!
If nature itself abides by and adheres to fixed natural laws and these natural laws work together as a collaborative unit to bring forth a harmonious and productive result doesn’t it stand to reason that since we, as humans, are a by-product of nature, that we too must abide by fixed laws to create a harmonious and productive result? By the way, this is a rhetorical question – the answer is an emphatic “yes”!!!
Just as we do not define nature, we do NOT define truth – “truth” is what it is, regardless of our perspective or perception. We do not determine what a thing is – it is the ”nature” of a thing that defines it!! So truth is closely tied to nature when we speak of our human nature as a man and a woman. And our natures our dictated by natural laws (as mentioned previously) because without law there is chaos and when we go outside of the established natural law there is also chaos; thus, laws and nature are inextricably tied together – you cannot separate the two!! And hence, when we speak of “truth” with regards to our nature as a man/woman then we must speak of nature and laws since we are a by-product of nature and it’s laws.
The natural laws apply to us since we are naturally created elements whose survival is based on the “natural” laws of air, water, light etc. Our survival is not based on man’s law rather we must adhere to the pre-ordained natural laws by which we came into existence so that we can maintain our existence!! ”. The “natural order of things” that I speak of is within this aforementioned framework “Religion” does not control our thinking – “people” do – so don’t blame religion blame people!!
So again – we do not define truth (the nature of a thing), we only acknowledge and need to adhere to truth (to the nature of a thing) to be in harmony with the natural order of things. We need to adhere to the natural laws of existence for us to create a harmonious and a productive result in our society as humans – it is only when we go outside of our natures (truth and natural laws of humans) and the natural order of things that chaos and destruction results.
“Marriage” – the union of the male and female, has nothing to with religion – those who say this are misguided – the ceremony (act) of marriage is only an acknowledgement of that which takes place naturally!!! It is only natural for the male and female to come together and unite and become a unit to procreate and continue the cycle of our existence as a species (nature knows what it is doing!!!) – UNIFICATION IS “THE” natural law of the man and woman!!!
Einstein and scientists need to look no longer for the “unified theory of all” in the physical realm of our universe – the natural laws of the unification of the “man and woman” is at the root of his (Einstein’s) question of “What unifies all”. Einstein and scientists looked at the mathematical, physical/material level for their answer – they are overlooking the obvious – the answer to their quest is not in the physical rather their answer lies in the metaphysical/spiritual realm of man and woman. If you study the forces that gravitate the male to the female and the female to the male you will then begin to understand that which unifies all!! IT IS THE SAME LAW that applies to all! You heard it first on SoSuave!!
Newman, society’s rules have changed but not the rules of the man’s and woman’s nature (natural laws are constant) – this is why the Hor/Homo agenda is a corruption of the natural order of things because they go against that which is natural and thus right as it relates to human interaction and function on earth!
I never said that men were designed (by nature) to be with one woman but it was designed that a woman to be with one man Men reject the offspring of another man’s sperm and have total disregard for it’s well-being thus this goes against the survival of a species (men kill babies who are not the doing of their own loins in times of war). On the other hand, the man tends to feel a natural belonging to that which he produces but when he is in doubt or knows that he parked his sperm in the womb of a hor (a non-married woman) then he sees her only as a vehicle of pleasure and had no inclination of having offspring with a street urchin so he rejects the child solely based upon the reflection of the horishness of the mother – he only wanted sex and not an eternal tie to the hor which produced his offspring – thus a unwanted and unloved bastard is born!!!! Welcome to America!!!
Is it natural for a woman’s womb that is designed to bring forth life to be a diseased pool of germs that creates death or retards birth (Aids and other diseases)\??? That which is created for life (the womb) now brings forth death through disease and pollution of many men’s sperm all vying for existence in her inner sanctum!! That which was and is “naturally” designed for life now brings death? HUH??? What caused this? I’ll tell you, since you don’t know or pretend not to know – it is the woman’s wh@redoms which is at the root of this “UN-NATURAL” order of things”!!!!
YES, it is the man’s nature to pursue the woman (this is known), and we have consistently followed the dictates of our nature as men – but what has changed in the most modern of times is the acquiescence of the women – the woman has the final determination to accept our wooing advances or to cast them aside in hopes for a greater affirmation of her womanhood from another man!! \Women (hors) of today have no shame and give them selves readily to all, or most, or some, or one she sees as desirable regardless of commitment or loyalty or vow!!! She (the hor – the unmarried woman) wants satisfaction of her carnal desires without consequence of the womb – but again, we cannot deny the natural law that dictates the action of the sperm and egg!!!
Truth is embedded within the natural law and thus life (a baby) will spring forth regardless of the emotions, intents, or commitments of the parties involved. Birth is predicated upon action (the union of the male/female) regardless of intent (birth is predicated on natural law to create offspring which is good and right). It is assumed by the sperm and the egg that there was consented intent in their union and it was the doing of the two opposite sexes for the purpose of creating life ---- the sperm and egg follow natural law and thus are consistent in their function regardless of the “intent” of the two parties involved in the sexual act of procreation!!!!!
Do you see how the acquiescence of “modern’ women (hors) against the natural order of things have created havoc through so-called ‘unwanted pregnancies”, “abortions”, “man-made disease”, and “one-night stands”, “Boyfriends”, “LTR’s, STR’s”, and “Pimps” ???
If a woman accepts many men and invites and acquiesces to their sexual advances then what incentive is there for a man to embrace and dedicate himself to her offspring??? She is a hor and no one special – the man views himself as the next pimp in line and the newborn child is the result of “someone else’s sperm that led to this “accidental” birth. All sane men deny being the procreator of the unmarried hor’s offspring! This is the natural and correct response!
