Agreed. Soy is a hard no.Probably not I would say...probably soy protein which is a hell no from me haha
Agreed. Soy is a hard no.Probably not I would say...probably soy protein which is a hell no from me haha
It's also the source of mineral and nutrient leaching phytic acid, enzyme disrupting compounds and phytoestrogens.Soy gets a bad rap. Nutritionally it is the most “complete” source of plant protein.
definitely better, but for me, it makes it more difficult to get the 175g of protein or so I need everyday. That’s a lot of eggs and chicken breasts and fish to get that high. Not impossible though.Almost all protein powders are loaded with a bunch of junk. You’re better of getting protein from real foods. I stopped using protein powder and I’ve had zero issues putting on muscle. I do eat a lot of baked chicken breasts though
It doesn't matter how good-looking you are, how romantic you are, how funny you are... or anything else. If she doesn't have something INVESTED in you and the relationship, preferably quite a LOT invested, she'll dump you, without even the slightest hesitation, as soon as someone a little more "interesting" comes along.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Where did you get the 175g requirement from?definitely better, but for me, it makes it more difficult to get the 175g of protein or so I need everyday.
Simply not true. Go look a quality unflavored green pea and brown rice protein and tell me what you find.Almost all protein powders are loaded with a bunch of junk. You’re better of getting protein from real foods. I stopped using protein powder and I’ve had zero issues putting on muscle. I do eat a lot of baked chicken breasts though
The requirement for muscle is actually really only 0.69g per pound of lean muscle but to be even double sure the researchers bumped it to 0.82g per pound of lean muscle. No difference was found.definitely better, but for me, it makes it more difficult to get the 175g of protein or so I need everyday. That’s a lot of eggs and chicken breasts and fish to get that high. Not impossible though.
Personally I use the following splits for the most part:My understanding is that protein should be 10%-30% of total calories with 10% being the lowest to prevent deficiency. How this works out:
2,000 calories = 50g to 150g
3,000 calories = 75g to 225g
4,000 calories = 100g to 300g
It’s a broad range. However, if you are at 3,000+ calories you probably want to trend more into replacing some of that protein with healthy carbs.
Well I'm here to tell you there is such a magic wand. Something that will make you almost completely irresistible to any woman you "point it" at. Something guaranteed to fill your life with love, romance, and excitement.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
I take that back...Sunwarrior makes premade shakes with 30g of protein that contain Green Pea, Brown Rice and Pumpkin Seed Protein...Agreed. Soy is a hard no.
Sure they are.green pea and brown rice protein are more toxic then whey protein. Overtime you will notice it, can take weeks, months or years based on your whole diet
Yes they do. Egg whites contain Antinutrients that is binded to biotin.
It's funny how the people who think they know so much don't even know what they don't know.Yes Its fun to see how many here have no idea about a healthy diet, especially the mods.. Brainwashed by society to think that brown rice is healthier then white rice and that pea protein is a great protein source, just shows how many People are Beta Male followers
On low carb days it's higher than that and on high carb days it's lower than that...when you average it out over the week, that's right around my average for fat intake per day.Try lowering your fats to 0.3g/lb total bodyweight and backfilling with carbs. Unless you need higher fats for digestion, 0.3g/lb is all that's needed to support hormones.
If you're on TRT, you can drop fats even lower than that.
I've read plenty of articles and studies from many different places and haven't seen a single one that said anything bad about it. In fact, overwhelmingly good things are said about it, including benefits other than muscle building.The Quote fits perfectly to you because you didnt even ask why it is unhealthier, but instead felt free to judge. Shot in your own leg. All I can say is that I have perfect blood works, Hormon levels you will ever get to see in Paper and that only with real food without any bs supplements
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
In a vacuum that may be true but our bodies don't work in a vacuum.Right, what I'm saying is that natty folks need 0.3g/lb fat intake for optimal hormone support. More than that does not improve hormones, less than that hurts it. You may find it beneficial to keep it right at 0.3g/lb. FWIW, NASM recommends like .23g/lb or something - I prefer the conservative approach.
If you're higher fats on some days - you're getting no added value out of it. if you're lower fats on other days, you are negatively impacting your hormones on that day. The net result is that you hurt your hormonal support.
nice, I’m going to order it and give it a try And compare against the whey.I take that back...Sunwarrior makes premade shakes with 30g of protein that contain Green Pea, Brown Rice and Pumpkin Seed Protein...
yeah, there’s no real penalty for drinking too much proteinThe reason why folks always harp on the 1g/lb is in case you miss a little - you're still in the green. maximum benefit for natties is shown to be 0.9g/lb, but 1.0g/lb ensures that if you're off by a hair in your macro counting, you still met the max benefit.
FDA nutrition labels aren't as accurate as you think they are btw.
FDA has stated labels can be and are at times off by 20%The reason why folks always harp on the 1g/lb is in case you miss a little - you're still in the green. maximum benefit for natties is shown to be 0.9g/lb, but 1.0g/lb ensures that if you're off by a hair in your macro counting, you still met the max benefit.
FDA nutrition labels aren't as accurate as you think they are btw.
What's worked better is the steroids they have taken I am sure.I'm not understanding... all data points to 0.3g/lb fat intake as minimal required for optimal performance. Would you add water to your gasoline one day just to add 93 octane boost the next? The net result is a loss.
If you think what you're doing is the best way to do it - go right ahead. I was offering input that is supported by all current data that you could use or ignore. Not looking to argue with someone who doesn't want to follow what's worked for all of the biggest dudes I know.
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.