Promiscuity and Pair Bonding

[Pierce Manhammer]

I do sometimes shake my head at some of the statements and shibboleths some posters perpetuate on this board.

It makes me wonder how rooted in reality some folks are that they hold such polarized talking points so close to the heart.

Sometimes I just get in the mood to take a mfer out and let the Kraken loose, but mostly I sit back and watch the circus of imbeciles arguing the finer points of whatever asinine trope about virginity or body count they’re latched onto.

I’m sure there is more than a handful of us that do.

Seriously, no one wants a gal that's been run through by the rugby team, but you guys splitting hairs about gals with single-digit bodycounts? Makes me think none of those posters actually has ever been out from behind their keyboards...

Next On SoSuave:
“Is it okay to consider an LTR with a college freshman who’s super hot and has a body count of 3? I mean, she’s had a cawk in her. Is she a sloot?!?”

 

[Dr.Suave]

“Is it okay to consider an LTR with a college freshman who’s super hot and has a body count of 3? I mean, she’s had a cawk in her. Is she a sloot?!?”

And the usual replies would be something along the lines of:

- Its not the 19xxs anymore
- You are unrealistics/insecure/delusional
- Dont ask questions you dont want blah blah blah
- She will never tell you the real number anyway
- Multiply the number exponentially by 4
- There are no virgin women
- She is lying

Did I miss any?

For whatever is worth, in your hypotethical example imho yes, she is worth considering.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

For whatever is worth, in your hypotethical example imho yes, she is worth considering.

Of course she is, that was my point.

 

[soulforge]

And the usual replies would be something along the lines of:

- Its not the 19xxs anymore
- You are unrealistics/insecure/delusional
- Dont ask questions you dont want blah blah blah
- She will never tell you the real number anyway
- Multiply the number exponentially by 4
- There are no virgin women
- She is lying

Did I miss any?

For whatever is worth, in your hypotethical example imho yes, she is worth considering.

Fair point.. I don't think there is anything wrong with being cautious of a girl who has been ran through, like really ran through.

But if she does have a body count, but you are getting the king treatment, then why let it bother you.

 

[pipeman84]

Seriously, no one wants a gal that's been run through by the rugby team, but you guys splitting hairs about gals with single-digit bodycounts?

Single digit ... Firstly, there's a HUGE difference between 1, 4 and 9. Secondly, you make it sound as if a digit is as innocuous as an ice-cream cone when in fact there's a whole story and lessons to be drawn from each one. For instance, is that digit that we split hairs about an ONS? That tells a lot about that woman ... basically she's not wife material ... that is unless you're willing to deal with a woman with serious issues and you're willing to do paternity tests every time she gets pregnant.
Is that digit a failed relationship? Again, a lot of useful information ... who was the guy, why did it fail? Was it an extraordinary circumstance or part of a pattern and you'll be the next addition to it?

 

[Fortune_favors_the_bold]

I also think that there is a huge difference between 1 and 3 or 3 and 8...it's a whole world despite it's all single digit.

It's not that different instead 10 compared to 15 or 15 compared to 20 cause in that case we're already talking about a rental car that has to be taken for granted as a damaged good.

 

[Clockwerk50]

I also think that there is a huge difference between 1 and 3 or 3 and 8...it's a whole world despite it's all single digit.

It's not that different instead 10 compared to 15 or 15 compared to 20 cause in that case we're already talking about a rental car that has to be taken for granted as a damaged good.

That is basically the law of marginal returns. It comes a point where the difference between high numbers is neglagible.

 

[Divorced w 3]

This whole thread reeks of insecurity, as well as being disingenuous. What I mean by that is let’s face it, not many men are equating sex with love either. For me anyway, the love connection comes with the non sexual stuff, the emotional intimacy so to speak, the quality time or whatever one’s love language is, and then the sex becomes loving. I think it’s unrealistic to expect otherwise.

 

[CBear]

This whole thread reeks of insecurity, as well as being disingenuous. What I mean by that is let’s face it, not many men are equating sex with love either. For me anyway, the love connection comes with the non sexual stuff, the emotional intimacy so to speak, the quality time or whatever one’s love language is, and then the sex becomes loving. I think it’s unrealistic to expect otherwise.

This is a typical mindset of men who overcomplicate their lives and justify why.
Not an insecure thread. A very good one, actually.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

Bravo, analysis paralysis at its finest.

You keep mulling on those numbers while I go enjoy my 5th-decade of life, like it’s a carnival.

PS. don't forget to ask for a hymen verification...

Single digit ... Firstly, there's a HUGE difference between 1, 4 and 9. Secondly, you make it sound as if a digit is as innocuous as an ice-cream cone when in fact there's a whole story and lessons to be drawn from each one. For instance, is that digit that we split hairs about an ONS? That tells a lot about that woman ... basically she's not wife material ... that is unless you're willing to deal with a woman with serious issues and you're willing to do paternity tests every time she gets pregnant.
Is that digit a failed relationship? Again, a lot of useful information ... who was the guy, why did it fail? Was it an extraordinary circumstance or part of a pattern and you'll be the next addition to it?

 

[Millard Fillmore]

Taking sex way too seriously for $100, Alex.