AttackFormation
Master Don Juan
I have some sympathy for women pretending to be chaste, because men either A) want women to pretend to be chaste (these are the guys who even on this forum think if she waits to fvck you then "that must mean she is classy gf material"), or B) consider women to be cattle who shouldn't have lives or wills beyond waiting around to fulfill mens' personal fantasies. Combine that with an ignorance of the fact that in the animal kingdom the median female has more sex with more partners than the median male does, and you get lots of gullible and ignorant men who don't want to live in reality. So if a woman is looking for a provider, it makes pragmatic sense for her to pretend to be chaste according to the mens' wishes.All men want sex right away, anyone who restrains themselves is acting, including the woman unless she is cruelly choosing the man as a beta provider she is not attracted to physically. Withholding sex is a trick used by women to make themselves seem chaste but it has zero to do with male intentions. You are rationalizing acting based on a charade to assuage the ego. You are asking someone who doesn't even know you to immediately value you for a relationship.
But it's still ridiculous for the reasons you say. You don't need to fvck on the first date, but either she wants to have sex too or she's cruelly cleaning out someone she has no arousal for. In either case, you're not fooling me and we should get rid of the pretense. But it won't change until our attitudes about gender sex dynamics are updated to a more intelligent level, if ever.
The women may be deceptive, but (just like AFC thirst making every woman feel like a celebrity) I think the gullibility and malign, willful ignorance of the men they deceive is a larger irritation.
Last edited: