Obummer calls for police to respect the looters.....

[Jaylan]

A further demonstration that different races cannot easily leave togheter is here, despite the trial is not over and there is not a virdict you see all the black guys in a side and all the white ones in the other.

Somebody said it was a "race issue" well it is, if a simple fact like this created so easily and fast such division according to racial lines it means that there is something deeper on humans than simply a color.
And this is not happening because someone is creating sides and inviting people, it happens automatically and instinctually.

Not saying any of those sides is right or wrong, just saying that again water and oil cannot be mixed simply cause they are in the same bottle.

Sosuave is not representative of larger American society.

If you look at the comments on news stories or social media, youll see that the vast majority of all minorities of various background, are particularly skeptical of the Ferguson PD's story and handling of the case.

However with whites commenting, there's a rough split down the middle. Most left leaning people slam the police, while the right leaning slam Brown. So all in all, Sosuave responses dont prove much.

And actually, whenever a race issue comes up nationally in America, youll notice the majority of minorities side together, while whites split in half. A good example is the Obama election and re-election. So actually, this is not as simple as saying there's a racial water and oil thing going on. In reality its more a political and social issue divide...with minorities banding together mostly on one side, and whites more evenly split of such issues.

 

[speed dawg]

Why can't you ever shut up yourself and wait for things to unfold yourself? All you do is froth at the mouth and get wet over any chance to start a new discussion bashing black people. E-activism isnt getting you anywhere buddy. Dudes who think like you will always be relegated to whining online just like 12 yr olds do when they lose badly playing Halo on Xbox. And why will little f@gg0ts like that never be relevant?...because just like the immature bratty 12 year old, guys like you dont have the gall or courage to open their mouths in public and put a face to their hidden beliefs.

Wait, I'm confused. White guys like me are "irrelevant" but somehow we are in control of some huge conspiracy that's still holding the poor black man down?

Quite the contradiction, huh?

E-activism. Nice term, coined by the Rainbow Man himself.

 

[Jaylan]

Wait, I'm confused. White guys like me are "irrelevant" but somehow we are in control of some huge conspiracy that's still holding the poor black man down?

Quite the contradiction, huh?

E-activism. Nice term, coined by the Rainbow Man himself.

White guys like you who b!tch and whine online are irrelevant. White guys with power...hell all men with power dont sit online whining like children with an inability to actually influence sh!t in the real world. You may be a backward thinking idiot just like a man like Donald Sterling, but Sterling actually put his idiocy into action. He sure as hell wasnt arguing with people online.

Any man worth his fvking salt is taking his beliefs, putting a face on them and moving forward with real world actions. You think revolutionaries of the past would get a damn thing done by sitting online and complaining to others on an obscure pickup forum? How about you do something to rally the troops? Minorities of various backgrounds have no problems rallying a base around a cause. Yet white dudes such as yourself endless lament the fact that a huge portion of white people think your beliefs are fvking dumb.

Turn your beliefs into actions. Hell, the Klan is actually planning to march and rally in Missouri. I actually give them props for having balls and courage to get sh!t done. But you? Lol, guys like you and noobology waste your time on pickup forums discussing this crap.

At least start some kind of viral social media movement. Feminists can get that #yesallwomen bullcrap started...but fvkbags like you are left kvetching on Sosuave Anything Else forum. Youre not changing the world here buddy. Its a waste of time to even discuss this crap on this forum given what this forum's main focus is and its lack of web traffic when compared to political websites.

But what the fck am I even saying here? I should be smiling and laughing at all the butthurt white dudes who complain on the internet because they lack the power to change any of the things they are pissed about. Oh wait....I already do that.

 

[( . )( . )]

you see all the black guys in a side and all the white ones in the other.

Not quite.

https://twitter.com/kyle_rogers76/status/502313179440230400

* Moral preening, docile white libtard goes to Ferguson.
* Gets the sh!t kicked out of him.
* Blames mother for being "raycis".

:crackup: :crackup: :crackup: Gold.



On a side note if Fatal Jay and Gaylan wish to show Officer Wilson their support along with the rest of the silent majority:

http://www.gofundme.com/SupportOfficerWilson He's already past 180K

 

[Stagger Lee]

More mature than trying to say one side is entirely at fault or the other. What if he did run at the police for good reason? Then he is justified and so are the police. What if he ran for a bad reason and the police shot him in the back? Then both sides are at fault.
Your ignorance is that you immediately conclude that one side must be irreproachable and the entirety of guilt lies with the other party. Such a narrow perception of reality.

No, the credible evidence says he strong arm robbed a store, when stopped later punched the cop, reportedly grabbed for the officer's gun, then charged the officer who had his gun drawn. What could possible be a "good" reason to rush a cop who has his gun drawn on you? You're the one that's ignorant and creating a straw man argument.

 

[Ice Fishing n 40 ozs]

White guys like you who b!tch and whine online are irrelevant. White guys with power...hell all men with power dont sit online whining like children with an inability to actually influence sh!t in the real world. You may be a backward thinking idiot just like a man like Donald Sterling, but Sterling actually put his idiocy into action. He sure as hell wasnt arguing with people online.

Any man worth his fvking salt is taking his beliefs, putting a face on them and moving forward with real world actions. You think revolutionaries of the past would get a damn thing done by sitting online and complaining to others on an obscure pickup forum? How about you do something to rally the troops? Minorities of various backgrounds have no problems rallying a base around a cause. Yet white dudes such as yourself endless lament the fact that a huge portion of white people think your beliefs are fvking dumb.

Turn your beliefs into actions. Hell, the Klan is actually planning to march and rally in Missouri. I actually give them props for having balls and courage to get sh!t done. But you? Lol, guys like you and noobology waste your time on pickup forums discussing this crap.

At least start some kind of viral social media movement. Feminists can get that #yesallwomen bullcrap started...but fvkbags like you are left kvetching on Sosuave Anything Else forum. Youre not changing the world here buddy. Its a waste of time to even discuss this crap on this forum given what this forum's main focus is and its lack of web traffic when compared to political websites.

But what the fck am I even saying here? I should be smiling and laughing at all the butthurt white dudes who complain on the internet because they lack the power to change any of the things they are pissed about. Oh wait....I already do that.

Pot meet kettle fool

 

[Jaylan]

Pot meet kettle fool

Except everything I say here, I say on my social media accounts that have my real name and my face on them. Everything I say online Ive said whenever Ive gone to meeting or rallies for different issues in the past.

Fact of the matter is, I never ever come across white dudes in real life who say the things I come across from people who think like speeddawg. And its not even very common to see white guys put a face to their beliefs on social media. Guys like this hide their face because they know most of the country would shun them. But hell, isnt it a strong and truly proud man that voices his beliefs unabashedly even in the face of scrutiny?

So no, no pot meeting kettle mr. lurker.

 

[Fatal Jay]

Lol, f@gg0ts like you need to take their own advice. All the jumping to conclusions youve done and all the continuous b!tching you do about black people, and you have the nerve to tell others to wait out the investigation?

You made a lot of assumptions yourself, yet now we find out the Ferguson PD didnt release complete security tapes, that one tape appears shows Brown paying for his stuff, and they also leave out how the store didnt contact them about a robbery.

Why can't you ever shut up yourself and wait for things to unfold yourself? All you do is froth at the mouth and get wet over any chance to start a new discussion bashing black people. E-activism isnt getting you anywhere buddy. Dudes who think like you will always be relegated to whining online just like 12 yr olds do when they lose badly playing Halo on Xbox. And why will little f@gg0ts like that never be relevant?...because just like the immature bratty 12 year old, guys like you dont have the gall or courage to open their mouths in public and put a face to their hidden beliefs.

I like to call that being b!tch-made.

PS - Maybe you can make your next thread a whiny b1tchfest about "mudsharks". You can lament how the black penis' superior length and girth have probably rendered these women unsatisfiable by the average white male. (Since you love analyzing black stereotypes so much, I thought Id troll with the penis myth lol)

:rockon: :rockon: :rockon: :rockon: :rockon: :rockon: :rockon: :rockon: :rockon: :rockon:

 

[( . )( . )]

Except everything I say here, I say on my social media accounts that have my real name and my face on them. Everything I say online Ive said whenever Ive gone to meeting or rallies for different issues in the past.

Fact of the matter is, I never ever come across white dudes in real life who say the things I come across from people who think like speeddawg. And its not even very common to see white guys put a face to their beliefs on social media. Guys like this hide their face because they know most of the country would shun them. But hell, isnt it a strong and truly proud man that voices his beliefs unabashedly even in the face of scrutiny?

So no, no pot meeting kettle mr. lurker.

Big difference is your hatred for whitey won't see you fired (if you had a job). Where as on the flip side his ability to notice stuff can see him not only lose his livelihood but shunned by the hivemind. Things can get a bit complicated.

 

[Fatal Jay]

Big difference is your hatred for whitey won't see you fired (if you had a job). Where as on the flip side his ability to notice stuff can see him not only lose his livelihood but shunned by the hivemind. Things can get a bit complicated.

Your the only racist on here, you still stupid enough to think that blacks is the largest number on food stamps, when it's actually whites.

Your pea brain fail to realize black is only a small minority in the U.S. and food stamps started off with whites, blacks could not even receive for a number of years

 

[( . )( . )]

Your the only racist on here

And? Is there a punchline?

Your pea brain fail to realize black is only a small minority in the U.S.

Yep 12.6% apparently, and yet you receive 39.8% of the total welfare. Those numbers are phucking disgusting. Why the hell are you here crusading against the white debbil? Get the hell out there and start exacting change.

 

[Fatal Jay]

And? Is there a punchline?



Yep 12.6% apparently, and yet you receive 39.8% of the total welfare. Those numbers are phucking disgusting. Why the hell are you here crusading against the white debbil? Get the hell out there and start exacting change.

Change some nuts down your throat biatch.

 

[( . )( . )]

Change some nuts down your throat biatch.

No Justice No Peace

 

[VikingKing]

And? Is there a punchline?



Yep 12.6% apparently, and yet you receive 39.8% of the total welfare. Those numbers are phucking disgusting. Why the hell are you here crusading against the white debbil? Get the hell out there and start exacting change.

Amazing....

 

[VikingKing]

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/...lled-by-black-cop-heres-how-the-media-reacted

No one cares. Kind of like when somthing bad happens to a woman, all over the news. A man? no one cares.

Good job blacks, you're basically the new women.

 

[rascal99v]

The Dems didn't enact these programs solely to aid black people and if they did show me where.

No sh1t, all types of poor people were helped out because of these programs, but blacks were aided and they benefited the most out of these programs. Democrats worked with black leaders to help get the laws written and passed. You don't base a program only for one specific group Rex. Blacks were still raised up by it.

What you described is prejudice.

No, it is not just prejudice, it is racism, in which you refuse to acknowledge.

Denying Puerto Ricans to buy goods from their store based on their ethnicity, calling the cops on them for no reason, accusing them of stealing, blacks vandalizing Puerto Rican owned businesses because of their race, black gangs killing Puerto Ricans just because of who they are, is known as hate crimes which is all based on racism. My cousin and my friend are both cops, they deal with this stuff all the time. The crimes are listed under "hate crimes" which is racially related known as racism.

Donald Sterling tried to evict his black tenants, black store owners evicted Puerto Rican citizens from their storefront property. Sounds very racist to me on both sides. Donald didn't want them in his building, the store owners didn't want them in their store, same difference based on racism.

Gangers tend to not like anybody who isn't down with their set.

Sounds like you are defending what they are doing. :yes:

White Supremacists tend not to like anybody who isn't down with their set, who only happen to be white and support their beliefs. They hate blacks, asians, hispanics, jews, and catholics.

You call them and guys like Donald Sterling racist, but you want to give black gangsters a free pass who hold the same views.

That's being a black sympathizer because you refuse to acknowledge that the black gang members commit violent crimes based on race as well. Those are still hate crimes dude. No matter how you slice it, it is based on race for both groups. You are being a black sympathizer no matter what harm or evil they do. You just want to make excuses for them.

Black slumlords are being sued for housing discrimination? Where's the case?

Get out in real world sometime and see what's going on around you to find out. Look up some articles in the newspapers if you want to know more about it.

There are several rich black businessmen who are referred to as "Uncle Tom's" by regular folks who undercut their black tenants and employees to make a dime.

They were pissed off and as a result developed acrimony and resentment towards whites.

:crackup: Nice excuse Rex.

They were pissed off, so what? They are still racist because of the resentment, are they not? Not every white feels that particular way, so there is no need for them to be a racist.

White Supremacists are pissed off and hold resentment because President Obama was elected twice to office in two elections.

What's the difference if you have a pissed off white and a pissed off black guy holding racist views?

You are a black sympathizer Rex. Blacks can hold any prejudice belief they want, be a racist expousing racial epitaphs towards whites, and you are just fine with that because according to you, "They were pissed off and as a result developed acrimony and resentment towards whites", which we all know is a hallmark trait of racism, refusing to believe that there is anything wrong with your own race.

You feel it's ok for blacks to hold racist views but don't want to accept they are indeed racists. But then you want to attack whites for holding those same ignorant views towards blacks. You can't only have it your way dude. Two wrongs don't make a right.

When did I said they did.

:crackup:

You just said this below didn't you?

The Dixiecracts weren't particularly down with the Civil Rights Movement

What I said is, that not everybody is going to agree within the party. The Dixiecrats did not support the Civil Rights Movement within the Democratic Party like you said. That is not agreeing within the party. Why can't you understand your own comments?

What you said wasn't relevant to what I said. A lot of people were involved in getting Civil Rights legislation passed.

It's not relevant? WTF? You think If Richard Nixon beat Kennedy in 1960 that blacks would have any Civil Rights at that time? You're crazy man. :crazy:

Yes, a lot of people were involved, but it was blacks like Dr. King who was a Democrat who had members of the Democratic Party including Lyndon B Johnson and Robert F Kennedy along with black Democratic Leaders who had his back in getting the Civil Rights accomplished.

You think Republicans like Strom Thurmond would support that movement? :crackup:

You're a Republican I take it? I don't understand you Rex, you refuse to believe that there are racist blacks in the world and you refuse to believe that Democrats gave blacks their Civil Rights. Why do you think most blacks support the Democratic Party?

If you don't believe me Rex, go write a nice letter to the Honorable Congressman John Lewis who marched with Dr. King and was terribly beaten by racist whites in the Civil Rights Marches. Ask him what the Democratic Party did for blacks and Civil Rights, not to mention lifting them up to this very day. He is a wonderful and intelligent man who is also against the bogus Voter Id Laws that you have no clue about.

What you're saying is your opinion trumps data, research, and analysis that was conducted by the Department of Labor, fascinating.

Again, you are making things up. I said that women, minorities, and blacks advanced because of it, and they did. It's not my opinion at all, it's a fact. Blacks advanced over the years because of Affirmative Action did they not?

Without it, some blacks would never have been in higher positions. And you want to deny that? LOL

All you do, is want to argue stupid bvllsh1t twisting everything around. That's because you know you are wrong and refuse to admit it. :yes:

Doesn't matter if it was 10, 100, 1000, 100,000, or 1,000,000 blacks, they still advanced under the program which was it designed to do, to give them helping hand.


If 100 Women, 100 Hispanics, 100 Asians, 100 Blacks all advanced under Affirmative action, they still advanced because of the program, if there was no Affirmative Action they wouldn't hold their job today.

You really expect me to sit here in believe that there's no voter fraud in various elections that take place in the country? Really bruh.

There were less than 200 cases of voter fraud in the last election which equates to nothing. Those 200 votes did nothing.

When did I say a separate ID, I said go to an office and register to vote. If that isn't feasible, you can set up an apparatus where the clerks at DMV or the SS Administration has control of the registration card and you have to show ID and proof of your address to get it.

This is why you are Ignoramus Rex, you don't know what's going on, but you continue you to argue with me spouting off stupid sh1t in which you know nothing about.

I know you never said to get a separate ID, the new VOTER ID Laws requires you to get a separate VOTER ID in which you have to pay $5 to get or you can't vote. You shouldn't have to pay money in order to exercise your right to vote. That's why blacks are against it in poor communities. That's a poll tax Einstein.

You mean to tell me that septuagenarians, octogenarians, nonagenarians, went their entire lives without an ID? These people are getting social security and I'm sure that may need to do some sort of business which would require ID, I'm sure that they have one or if push come to shove they could get one.

The problem is Rex, a 98 year old woman's drivers license from 20+ years ago is expired. When she would try to use that license at her polling location she would be denied her right to vote because it's expired and they said she didn't look the same as pictured.

Dude, you can't vote at numerous places. You can only vote at your polling place in your polling precinct. Also at of seniors probably vote via absentee ballot.

:crackup:

Well, No sh1t, that's why your and the Republicans argument of voter fraud is asinine. I was pointing that out to you in my sarcastic sentence.

Voter ID laws force seniors to purchase a Voter ID and take a picture or they can't vote. And you say that's not discriminatory for people who fought for our freedom, and for civil rights who have been voting all their life?

How is requiring people to have proof of ID before they vote treating them as second class citizens?

Because if you don't have a current special state issued voter Id you cannot vote.

People shouldn't have to pay to vote for their basic rights as a citizen. These Id Laws are targeted for only certain states in where there is heavy minorities located in those districts. Why should some White Guy in Utah not show any ID and an old black man in Pennsylvania have to buy a new Id to vote? He is being treated as a second class citizen dude.

I don't get you at all. You refuse to accept that there are black racists in this world, you refuse to accept that Democrats helped blacks over the years, and then you want to discriminate against the basic rights for people who my friends. :crazy:

 

[Peaks&Valleys]

No sh1t, all types of poor people were helped out because of these programs, but blacks were aided and they benefited the most out of these programs. Democrats worked with black leaders to help get the laws written and passed. You don't base a program only for one specific group Rex. Blacks were still raised up by it.





No, it is not just prejudice, it is racism, in which you refuse to acknowledge.

Denying Puerto Ricans to buy goods from their store based on their ethnicity, calling the cops on them for no reason, accusing them of stealing, blacks vandalizing Puerto Rican owned businesses because of their race, black gangs killing Puerto Ricans just because of who they are, is known as hate crimes which is all based on racism. My cousin and my friend are both cops, they deal with this stuff all the time. The crimes are listed under "hate crimes" which is racially related known as racism.

Donald Sterling tried to evict his black tenants, black store owners evicted Puerto Rican citizens from their storefront property. Sounds very racist to me on both sides. Donald didn't want them in his building, the store owners didn't want them in their store, same difference based on racism.




Sounds like you are defending what they are doing. :yes:

White Supremacists tend not to like anybody who isn't down with their set, who only happen to be white and support their beliefs. They hate blacks, asians, hispanics, jews, and catholics.

You call them and guys like Donald Sterling racist, but you want to give black gangsters a free pass who hold the same views.

That's being a black sympathizer because you refuse to acknowledge that the black gang members commit violent crimes based on race as well. Those are still hate crimes dude. No matter how you slice it, it is based on race for both groups. You are being a black sympathizer no matter what harm or evil they do. You just want to make excuses for them.





Get out in real world sometime and see what's going on around you to find out. Look up some articles in the newspapers if you want to know more about it.

There are several rich black businessmen who are referred to as "Uncle Tom's" by regular folks who undercut their black tenants and employees to make a dime.





:crackup: Nice excuse Rex.

They were pissed off, so what? They are still racist because of the resentment, are they not? Not every white feels that particular way, so there is no need for them to be a racist.

White Supremacists are pissed off and hold resentment because President Obama was elected twice to office in two elections.

What's the difference if you have a pissed off white and a pissed off black guy holding racist views?

You are a black sympathizer Rex. Blacks can hold any prejudice belief they want, be a racist expousing racial epitaphs towards whites, and you are just fine with that because according to you, "They were pissed off and as a result developed acrimony and resentment towards whites", which we all know is a hallmark trait of racism, refusing to believe that there is anything wrong with your own race.

You feel it's ok for blacks to hold racist views but don't want to accept they are indeed racists. But then you want to attack whites for holding those same ignorant views towards blacks. You can't only have it your way dude. Two wrongs don't make a right.



:crackup:

You just said this below didn't you?



What I said is, that not everybody is going to agree within the party. The Dixiecrats did not support the Civil Rights Movement within the Democratic Party like you said. That is not agreeing within the party. Why can't you understand your own comments?



It's not relevant? WTF? You think If Richard Nixon beat Kennedy in 1960 that blacks would have any Civil Rights at that time? You're crazy man. :crazy:

Yes, a lot of people were involved, but it was blacks like Dr. King who was a Democrat who had members of the Democratic Party including Lyndon B Johnson and Robert F Kennedy along with black Democratic Leaders who had his back in getting the Civil Rights accomplished.

You think Republicans like Strom Thurmond would support that movement? :crackup:

You're a Republican I take it? I don't understand you Rex, you refuse to believe that there are racist blacks in the world and you refuse to believe that Democrats gave blacks their Civil Rights. Why do you think most blacks support the Democratic Party?

If you don't believe me Rex, go write a nice letter to the Honorable Congressman John Lewis who marched with Dr. King and was terribly beaten by racist whites in the Civil Rights Marches. Ask him what the Democratic Party did for blacks and Civil Rights, not to mention lifting them up to this very day. He is a wonderful and intelligent man who is also against the bogus Voter Id Laws that you have no clue about.




Again, you are making things up. I said that women, minorities, and blacks advanced because of it, and they did. It's not my opinion at all, it's a fact. Blacks advanced over the years because of Affirmative Action did they not?

Without it, some blacks would never have been in higher positions. And you want to deny that? LOL

All you do, is want to argue stupid bvllsh1t twisting everything around. That's because you know you are wrong and refuse to admit it. :yes:

Doesn't matter if it was 10, 100, 1000, 100,000, or 1,000,000 blacks, they still advanced under the program which was it designed to do, to give them helping hand.


If 100 Women, 100 Hispanics, 100 Asians, 100 Blacks all advanced under Affirmative action, they still advanced because of the program, if there was no Affirmative Action they wouldn't hold their job today.




There were less than 200 cases of voter fraud in the last election which equates to nothing. Those 200 votes did nothing.



This is why you are Ignoramus Rex, you don't know what's going on, but you continue you to argue with me spouting off stupid sh1t in which you know nothing about.

I know you never said to get a separate ID, the new VOTER ID Laws requires you to get a separate VOTER ID in which you have to pay $5 to get or you can't vote. You shouldn't have to pay money in order to exercise your right to vote. That's why blacks are against it in poor communities. That's a poll tax Einstein.





The problem is Rex, a 98 year old woman's drivers license from 20+ years ago is expired. When she would try to use that license at her polling location she would be denied her right to vote because it's expired and they said she didn't look the same as pictured.




:crackup:

Well, No sh1t, that's why your and the Republicans argument of voter fraud is asinine. I was pointing that out to you in my sarcastic sentence.

Voter ID laws force seniors to purchase a Voter ID and take a picture or they can't vote. And you say that's not discriminatory for people who fought for our freedom, and for civil rights who have been voting all their life?



Because if you don't have a current special state issued voter Id you cannot vote.

People shouldn't have to pay to vote for their basic rights as a citizen. These Id Laws are targeted for only certain states in where there is heavy minorities located in those districts. Why should some White Guy in Utah not show any ID and an old black man in Pennsylvania have to buy a new Id to vote? He is being treated as a second class citizen dude.

I don't get you at all. You refuse to accept that there are black racists in this world, you refuse to accept that Democrats helped blacks over the years, and then you want to discriminate against the basic rights for people who my friends. :crazy:

Why does everyone of your posts have to be 8 Million words?

Drugs?

 

[Fatal Jay]

For real, the only dude on here written novels and no one is taking the time to read it.

 

[Vulpine]

If you're scared for your life, and with your adrenaline is going on overdrive, you're going to be pulling that trigger as fast as you can. You don't stop after every shot and assess the damage it's done.

Editor's note: Maria Haberfeld is chairwoman of the Department of Law, Police Science and Criminal Justice Administration at John Jay College. She is the author of "Critical Issues in Police Training." The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author

Have you ever read Ayn Rand's Fountainhead?

I might as well go back to sleep now that they have the "big guns" of the spin doctorate out. A more blatant ground-laying of a legal defense to brace the public for a pre-determined outcome is not to be found.

"He's only human". I believe you, Ms. chairwoman of the Department of Law, Police Science and Criminal Justice Administration. Fine. The deceased may have taken a bullet, through the hand, to the head, and fell forward - only to catch another bullet in the head on the way to the ground. I have nothing to be irritated about: I'd be scared of an unarmed person, too, despite a taser, pepper spray, a bullet proof vest, an army (with military surplus) waiting on my radio call, a big gas-guzzling SUV to hide behind, a gun, and my training that was all paid for with tax dollars.

*fluffing pillow*

...the crowd almost had me fooled into being disappointed. But, now that a cop told me to be ready to obey their agenda, I'll obey. The shooter was only human. Oopsie.

*Zzzz... weeeweweweweeee... ZZzz... weeweweweweee...*

 

[Maximus Rex]

Rex Says

This is happening everywhere there is a black majority. American cities right now. They raise up minority participation through the roof, even when it's not necessary. They fire white employees and hire black ones. It's cronyism AND racism.

Which American cities are firing whites and hiring blacks? Cite your source so I find the discrimination law suit against that city.

Again, I point to Zimbabwe and South Africa, the blacks treat the whites worse than the whites treated the blacks.

Mobage did things for Mobage, he does has the best interest of his people at heart and scapecoated whites to detract from his ineptitude as a leader and to take away from the rampant corruption in his country.

At least there was no state-sponsored terror under Apartheid.

1) Apartheid was state sponsored terror.

2) Show where the South African government is funneling weapons to groups that want to systematically kill off whites.

But I know, I know. We 'deserve' it.

Europeans conquered these lands and basically did to them what happened to the Indians here. These people have a legitimate gripe and right to be pissed off, also the whites if they don't what's going on they should return to the land of their ancestors.

Right on cue, the deflective shaming.

No it's not. You're on message that's primarily about getting better with women, however, when I looked at the threads you post, you hardly have any threads related to getting better with women or your personal experiences with them. If you do post them, because I'd like to read, however, you do seem to have a lot threads b*tching about "plight of the white man in American." Now post about whatever you want, but I just found the sh*t kinda odd.

Can't he get puzzy and have his savory meals and keep noticing patterns? Or do the two have to be mutually exclusive?

No they don't, but dude isn't posting about game, there's no balance. Not dictating what person should or post about, and what patterns are those?

No sh1t, all types of poor people were helped out because of these programs, but blacks were aided and they benefited the most out of these programs.

According to who? If we benefited so much from these social programs, then why has the black community been economically, educationally, and politically stagnant for the past fifty years.

Blacks were still raised by it?

Raised in what sense?

Denying Puerto Ricans to buy goods from their store based on their ethnicity, calling the cops on them for no reason, accusing them of stealing, blacks vandalizing Puerto Rican owned businesses because of their race, black gangs killing Puerto Ricans just because of who they are, is known as hate crimes which is all based on racism.

Where is this happening at?

Donald Sterling tried to evict his black tenants, black store owners evicted Puerto Rican citizens from their storefront property.

BTW, Puetro Rican isn't a race.

You call them and guys like Donald Sterling racist,

Maybe because he is.

but you want to give black gangsters a free pass who hold the same views.

Name the black gang that holds the same views as the Aryan Brotherhood? Is it the Bloods, Crips, Vice Lords, Gangster Disciples? Which one? Believe it or not a white person could conceivably get into one of those gangs, if they proved themselves to be a cool dude, however, a black person isn't getting into the Aryan Brotherhood or even a Mexican gang.

That's being a black sympathizer because you refuse to acknowledge that the black gang members commit violent crimes based on race as well.

I never said that didn't, but sh*t like that is extremely rare. You don't have black gang members sitting around talking about, "Let go find some white people to f*ck up today."

You are a black sympathizer Rex. Blacks can hold any prejudice belief they want, be a racist expousing racial epitaphs towards whites, and you are just fine with that because according to you

You feel it's ok for blacks to hold racist views but don't want to accept they are indeed racists. But then you want to attack whites for holding those same ignorant views towards blacks. You can't only have it your way dude. Two wrongs don't make a right.

When did I said it was fine? I was just offering a rationale on why people feel they way they do and if you really want to know, I don't think it's fine because these attitudes are counterproductive. Okay, you feel some kinda way about white people? What are you trying to do about it? We tend to blame white people for sh*t, but there's never any follow up or action.

refusing to believe that there is anything wrong with your own race.

This is where you lost with your pseudo intellectual bullsh*t.

1) I didn't say nor did I infer that.

2) One I (nor does any black person believe that b.s. you just spouted.

3) There are a lot of things with the black community, but that isn't the topic.

Why can't you understand your own comments?

Why can't you understand what other people write.

It's not relevant? WTF? You think If Richard Nixon beat Kennedy in 1960 that blacks would have any Civil Rights at that time? You're crazy man. :crazy:

Considering that Nixon signed issued Executive Order 11478, http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/11478.html which required all federal agencies to adopt "affirmative programs for equal employment opportunity." He would have.

Nixon viewed this situation as not only unfair to African Americans, but as a waste of valuable human resources which could help the nation grow.
Among the most pressing civil rights issues was desegregation of public schools. Nixon inherited a nation in which nearly 70% of the black children in the South attended all-black schools. He had supported civil rights both as a senator and as vice president under Eisenhower, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/nixon-domestic/

More on Nixon's Civil Rights record as president.

http://nixonfoundation.org/2013/02/robert-brown-president-nixon-strong-on-civil-rights/

You think Republicans like Strom Thurmond would support that movement? :crackup:

Be serious, dude.

You're a Republican I take it?

No, I'm not.

I don't understand you Rex, you refuse to believe that there are racist blacks in the world

Again, blacks don't control anything to allow us to be racist. Racism is about the control of institutions and denying others access to those institutions. Not wanting to sell a Puerto Rican in Yonkers a Snickers and a Coke doesn't make you racist. It makes you prejudice. If you believe that blacks are superior to other races based on race that makes you black supremacist.

and you refuse to believe that Democrats gave blacks their Civil Rights. Why do you think most blacks support the Democratic Party?

Because it wasn't solely Democrats who passed helped get the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and to believe so is historically inaccurate.

80% of Republicans in the House and Senate voted for the bill. Less than 70% of Democrats did. Indeed, Minority Leader Republican Everett Dirksen led the fight to end the filibuster. Meanwhile, Democrats such as Richard Russell of Georgia and Strom Thurmond of South Carolina tried as hard as they could to sustain a filibuster.

Of course, it was also Democrats who helped usher the bill through the House, Senate, and ultimately a Democratic president who signed it into law. The bill wouldn't have passed without the support of Majority Leader Mike Mansfield of Montana, a Democrat. Majority Whip Hubert Humphrey, who basically split the Democratic party in two with his 1948 Democratic National Convention speech calling for equal rights for all, kept tabs on individual members to ensure the bill had the numbers to overcome the filibuster.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/28/republicans-party-of-civil-rights

So could the Civil Rights Act gotten through Congress without that overwhelming Republican support?