muscles help but dont despire if u dont like weight lifting

madgame

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
860
Reaction score
1
haha, ok man, whatever you say. I didn't want to make it an argument or anything..... and I am not by any means bitter about muscles. You don't know what I look like, but I have said before that I do have some decent muscles, I have my own dam-n weight room, but I am still not saying one way is right over the other. I am just saying everyone is different, and if you want to get women just because of muscles, go for it, but I want my women to be better than that so I don't even bother with getting any bigger than I am now....The whole point of my post was that you should be confident with who you are now. Now don't argue with me and say, "Well uuuuuhh, I am more confident with muscles so I will get them." That is stupid. If you aren't confident without them, you're probably no better off with them. Be confident in who you are at the present moment. That's all. Forget it though, some people on here will never be "mature" enough to understand.
I must admit I'm sorry for losing it a little ;-). However I still think you brought up a lot of weak arguments and said plenty of plain wrong things.

Just one last go at it:

Prove me wrong on these 2 points on which I disagree with you (they're both in your last post)

1)I have to disagree with you because getting muscles made me get way more attention from the opposite gender (seriously thats just a fact) and this made me a lot more self-confident in return.

One of the smartest things I've heard lately was, this (its from a basketball coach): "CONFIDENCE IS DEMONSTRATED ABILITY". If you see you get a lot more attention from chicks and girls who weren't interested in you before flirt with you and almost everywhere you go females are starting to make eye contact with you and girls you used to find attractive that u know from school all of a sudden come on strong to you, that's 'demonstrated ability (to make girls find you attractive)' to me. Obviously this has boosted my confidence level from low to average confidence around women to above average/high confidence.
And I bet I'm not the only one, because probably one of the most used phrases on this forum is "I worked out and packed on some muscle. That has totally chaned the way I carry myself and my confidence level has increased so much"


2) I don't see why 'your women' would be better if they didn't like you because of physical attraction but because you have a big bank account and can provide food on the table for them (like you said)...A lot of people would actually say those women are even more superficial. I just look at it from a neutral perspective and say both is superficial.

Nor will anybody ever convince me that a woman who's int your muscles/body is more superficial than a woman who likes you for your cute face. Again I think both is pretty much equally superficial (though I feel kinda tempted to say that those who like you for having pretty eyes and a cute smile are even a bit more superficial technically, because that's something you can't work on..but its pretty much the same level of shallowness to me)

Okay, I just disagreed with your points (without dissing your or anything) now prove me wrong. I bet you can't find a real argument to back up your claims, other than 'You probably just imagined getting more attention from women/You're an exception/They started liking you more for some other reason' for #1 and I really have no idea how you're gonna back up your point of saying women who go for muscles are superficial, gold diggers who are into average-looking men who are smart and thus can get a phat bank account aren't.
(If you're trying to get out of this by saying 'I didn't say that/ mean it like that' please explain to me what you meant...I mean those are obviously 2 of your points. If you can't prove me wrong you'll obviously admit, that you're wrong...


@Screwit: Yes a lot of men tend to think the bigger the better. While some women like really big muscular men and some others don't like muscles at all, most women tend to prefer a guy who's lean has a 6pack and 'somewhat bigger than average muscles' - something in between a guy who's just slim and a bodybuilder guy. Like a lot of basketball players (guards forwards mostly not the bulky center guys ;)) or maybe guys like wesley snipes/jean claude van damme (cant think of anybody else right now)...
 

Aaron B

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Messages
910
Reaction score
29
Here is what I know. Its from my personal experience.

I don't have wide shoulders, and I am skinny in the neck, upper back, and upper chest. I'm 5'11" 170 pounds.

So even though I look pretty damn good with my shirt off, I still look like a skinny guy when I am wearing a dress shirt.

I'm going to gain another 20 lbs of muscle, targetting my traps and upper back, delts, and upper chest, while also working my lower body hard like I always do.

There is no question that I will be more attractive to women at 190 lbs than I am at 170. I know this because I get more attention at 170 than I did at 150.

I won't be "muscle-bound" or a "meat head." Which is great. Those aren't my goals.

I'll be eating more at 190, and I will have more testosterone at 190. I'll be having more sex at 190, and that sex will be with hotter females than I'm getting right now at 170.

Its not the size that matters, its the testosterone. If you have enough at your size, then thats great. I don't, so I'm gonna go get some more.

I hadn't seen my girl in a week (I just moved 200 miles away from her). We had sex 6 times over the weekend (and I didn't even get there until midnight friday and she left for work early sunday morning).

When I was with my ex-wife in a similar situation (we lived apart for about 9 months), we had sex 2 times in a weekend, tops. It was because I was out of shape and my testosterone wasn't high enough so I just didn't have the desire I do now.

Each of us needs to look at our individual situations and decide for ourselves. For myself, some added size in my neck and shoulders is the only thing keeping me from being considered a "hot guy" by damn near any female. And in this game, I want to operate from as great a position of strength as I possibly can.

Lastly, its not just my body I am working to improve. I am constantly looking to better myself in any area possible. Get out of that comfort zone as much as you can.
 

pimpfromdayone

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
676
Reaction score
1
Age
38
Ok, first of all, thankyou screwit, you hit the nail on the head with your statement. I'm not going to discuss that any further but I will reiterate a couple things he said:

"Again men found in the typical size range were judged as more attractive, healthy, and possessing many positive personal qualities.

So in reality, the athletic slim guy is the ideal type that mmost women want."

Notice that it does not generalize and say that ALL bodybuilders have horrible personality traits or are all less attractive, just most, and that's the important thing. We're working with statistics here, what happens most of the time, not individual cases. You might wonder how women infer about your personality just from your muscles.... well, think about it.... she probably is going to sense a little insecurity if you spend all day in a gym, whether you are or you aren't. Maybe she will make the presumption that you are trying to be able to keep your di-ck up? I don't know....She probably will also know you are not important enough to have anything better to do. It's all about status to them. This is a generalization that all women make.

So, I will defend my position and refute your first argument against me by saying, just because YOU got more attention from women doesn't mean ALL men will. In fact, according to the source Screwit identified, average men were favored in most cases, maybe some guys with slightly larger chests, but that is not hard to get. It again demonstrates the PROPORTION, not the size of the muscles. I won't argue that the V shape is desirable for women, because they are just programmed to like it, like we are programmed to like the hourglass shape of them, but nothing says that those of us who already possess that shape should gain even more muscle in order to be attractive. I recognize that there are exceptions, but once again, we're not talking about individual cases. If you aren't average, get to that point somehow, but it is unnecessary in most cases to keep working out. Seriously, I know guys who are obsessed with it and they get nowhere with women.

Yes, they're all superficial, just like most men, and there isn't anything really wrong with that. I wasn't saying that women who value money or something are less superficial than muscle loving women, so I agree with you there. "My" type of woman doesn't value either that much actually. I realize we're all superficial to a certain extent, but I want a woman with minimal superficiality, that's all. In that case, why then would I gain a lot of muscle just to get with these women? I wouldn't. I withhold financial information and other information that might make women want me based on those extrinsic things like that just to "weed" them out and find one who is the least superficial. It is a test so to speak.
I don't need to tell you that women value the face above all other physical aspects, but you're right, them liking someone for their face is the same thing. If you have neither muscle nor face, I STILL don't think transforming yourself into a tank is going to do anything for you. It's the same as an ugly girl who becomes skinny. Unless you just want something to fuc-k, it doesn't do much for you. I am not that kind of man, but some are, so I understand their logic, but most women aren't like that either.

I don't care about right or wrong, I'm just discussing the traits women value, nothing more. You're one individual out of billions, but I am instead addressing the majority of men.


Oh btw, testosterone levels and sex drive are determined just as much (I'd say more) by genetics than by muscle mass. I mentioned earlier that my testosterone level was absolutely out the roof last time I got tested, but I am not that anything more than skinny/athletic. I congratulate you on bettering your sexual life, by whatever means necessary, but I doubt that you can make your sex life any better if you're already at a high sex drive without the muscle. There, I'm done now.
 

Fatality

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
3
Yeah some women will assume that you are insecure if you are noticeably muscular. So what? Every human being judges people by their appearance. If you had more of an average build some women will assume you are weak and can't protect her. Build the physique you want and don't worry about what others will think because there will always be people that look at you in a negative way no matter what you look like.
 

pimpfromdayone

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
676
Reaction score
1
Age
38
You're right... however, it goes both ways, which means change can be pointless, "can" being the key word there. If you really didn't care about what others thought of you, you wouldn't bother with muscles anyway. A lot of people are like, "well, I do it because I want to, for myself." Bullshi-t. That is the most bullshi-t statement ever made. Yes, I acknowledge that many overweight or out of shape people do it for their health, but nobody benching 400+ lbs did it for their dam-n health.

Again, while I agree that many women would judge a skinnier or average guy as "weak," I really think most women are smarter and less superficial than that. I am a slave to my eyes, like all men, but I am smart and mature enough to know that there are other qualities that are important, not just her good looks. Subconsciously they may at the first instant be drawn to the man with large muscles because of that primitive idea that he will protect her. However, this is the 21st century.... we're not all running around fighting each other these days.... a skinny motherfu-cker with a 12 guage will blow the fu-ck out of any muscleman that wants to fight him. Maybe in caveman days the "natural selection" argument concerning muscles would hold true, but these days, no way.
 

sstype

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Messages
715
Reaction score
31
Location
atl, GA
Originally posted by pimpfromdayone
You're right... however, it goes both ways, which means change can be pointless, "can" being the key word there. If you really didn't care about what others thought of you, you wouldn't bother with muscles anyway. A lot of people are like, "well, I do it because I want to, for myself." Bullshi-t. That is the most bullshi-t statement ever made. Yes, I acknowledge that many overweight or out of shape people do it for their health, but nobody benching 400+ lbs did it for their dam-n health.
Dude, just because you supposedly have an easy time hooking up right and left with 9's and 10's does not mean that every other skinny guy is.

Take me for example, I am 5'10 162 lbs. I was born premature, thank god i didnt end up retarded, but all my life I have been skinny. I was 121 when I was a freshman so i made some natural weight gain, but I am still plagued with very skinny wrists and forearms, as well as a small chest. I also have big legs, which make me look a bit out of proportion.

Let me tell you how hard it is for me to attract the kind of women I want. VERY HARD. Oh yeah, I get hit on by the girls I dont like all time. Yet I never get noticed by noticeably attractive girls. I have to do all the chasing, which more often than not leads to a flake.

Despite this, I am still confident in myself, and I am still happy the way I am. But that doesnt mean shyt to these hotties I want to hook up with. My internal state does not seem to add much external value. For me, I need some more value. I value myself highly, but what do I have to show for it? How can women compete for me when there are no women already doing it in the first place?

So like I said, how you view yourself is mostly an internal thing. If you dont have the goods, most hot girls wont even look twice in your direction. Wake up

Again, while I agree that many women would judge a skinnier or average guy as "weak," I really think most women are smarter and less superficial than that. I am a slave to my eyes, like all men, but I am smart and mature enough to know that there are other qualities that are important, not just her good looks. Subconsciously they may at the first instant be drawn to the man with large muscles because of that primitive idea that he will protect her. However, this is the 21st century.... we're not all running around fighting each other these days.... a skinny motherfu-cker with a 12 guage will blow the fu-ck out of any muscleman that wants to fight him. Maybe in caveman days the "natural selection" argument concerning muscles would hold true, but these days, no way.
it doesnt matter, nature has it hardwired into women to PREFER built athletic men. Note that i said "prefer." I did not say that women only go for muscles, but 99 percent of women would like their mates to have an above average build. The percentage of women who would date skinny guys is less, while the percentage of women who would date fat men is considerably less.

You just happen to be one of the exceptions to the rule, supposedly. I see way more built alpha males than I do skinny alphas.
 

pimpfromdayone

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
676
Reaction score
1
Age
38
That's funny, because I see more alpha males of normal build than muscular ones... maybe it has something to do with intelligence, I don't know. Apparently, we disagree on what women like, but that's ok. I think they usually prefer the normal, athletic men, while you think they always favor the above average ones (and we're not talking about actual LOOKS here, like the face, that is COMPLETELY different). Natural selection has shown that women apparently favored the normal men for thousands of years, or else we'd all be giants by now. That is really the best way to tell. The genetic trend is NOT toward men with a muscular disposition, but rather, the normal look is highly predominant so the gene pool is not shifting one way or the other, if you know what I am saying... I am a bit rusty on the technical jargon, but I hope the point is still clear. You might say that, well, "everyone is fu-cking," so it makes no difference what has more reproductive fitness.... but I will just say that humans have had thousands of years to fu-ck all they want, and we're still not any bigger than we ever were. For facial appearance, that is just something I believe is a lot more random than body size, so that is why we're not all models.

This sh-it has gotten way too technical though.... but I still like comparing it to ti-t size. In general, most men probably prefer a cup size around the C cup (average I guess) more than either extreme (large or small). At least I do....
Women want protection and all of that, but generally speaking, they want someone HEALTHY. Healthy is a very vague term, but it just means they want someone who would produce fit offspring (using "fit" in the evolutionary sense). They want good genes, that's all. We want good genes too. They know your muscles aren't going to be acquired by your kids... but your general good health will (which means skinny-average guys are perfectly fine). This is all theory, but I think thousands of years of evolution proves a point fairly well. I thought someone asked if muscles will help a lot. I suppose they can get you some loose women for one night stands or something really well, but for relationships and stuff, they are of minimal importance.
 

Fatality

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
3
Originally posted by pimpfromdayone
You're right... however, it goes both ways, which means change can be pointless, "can" being the key word there. If you really didn't care about what others thought of you, you wouldn't bother with muscles anyway. A lot of people are like, "well, I do it because I want to, for myself." Bullshi-t. That is the most bullshi-t statement ever made. Yes, I acknowledge that many overweight or out of shape people do it for their health, but nobody benching 400+ lbs did it for their dam-n health.

First of all the guys that bench 400 aren't very common and I would say most guys aren't trying to bench that much.

If being more muscular makes you happier than it isn't pointless. Everybody in some way or another cares what other people think. The people who always say they don't care wouldn't even bathe or get haircuts if that were true. How is the "I do it for myself" statement bull****? Some guys believe it or not actually do enjoy working out. The body releases euphoric feelings after completing a tough workout. It's like a drug only it's good for you physically and mentally. Try working out and maybe you'll experience it.

It's also about protecting YOURSELF from predators. Just look at wildlife, the predator will always attack the smallest and weakest animal first. Natural instincts tell you that a larger animal is more likely to hurt you or protect itself that's why they go after the smaller one. Real life is no different. Say you're a criminal looking to mug somebody. One guy is walking down the street and is 5'9 140lbs. Another guy is walking down the street and he is 5'9 205 lbs of solid muscle.

Which one will you mug?
 

Aaron B

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Messages
910
Reaction score
29
Originally posted by pimpfromdayone
but it is unnecessary in most cases to keep working out. Seriously, I know guys who are obsessed with it and they get nowhere with women.
#1, guys you know who get nowhere with women are irrelevant to this conversation. We all know that the best looking guy in the world isn't going to get very far if he is AFC. He will get initial attraction, but he will screw it all up in short order by being too needy.

#2. Of course it is necessary to keep working out. I'm 30 years old. I want to look great when I'm 40, and great when I'm 50. And I want to be in good health.

I think at your age you aren't looking at the long-term picture. Neither did I. Luckily you can ignore your health and fitness in your 20's and still be okay down the road (which is what I did - I was a 40 inch waist and 215 lbs by the time I was 27, then I got serious and got in shape).

#3. Why do you keep making extreme example such as people having "excess muscle" and benching 400+ lbs? I'll probably never bench 400 lbs, I'm just not built to do it without making huge sacrifices that I'm not willing to make.

Sidenote: I don't even really train for muscle hypertrophy. I like to train low reps with heavy weights and also train explosively. I've had several people comment on my build that it looks "different" than what they normally see and despite my relatively low weight, I look like I have athletic ability. Hell I rarely even directly work my arms, because I'm not after size, I'm after real-world ability. And in the real world how much you can curl is almost irrelevant, but how well you can pull-up your own bodyweight is very useful.

You don't have to lift weights, but it is beneficial for your current and future health to exercise regularly. If you absolutely positvely don't want to lift, I recommend interval running, sprints, and plyometrics. Body weight squats, lunges, and push-ups are great as well. Pull-Ups and full-range of motion dips are some of the best exercises you can do as well.

Lastly, it is scientifically proven that intense weight training elevates your metabolism for up to 40 hours after the activity. Hopefully I don't need to explain the benefits of that.
 

lurker

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
208
Reaction score
6
Location
orange country holland
Woman prefer rugby type built men,
im almost in this category now and i dont want to get bigger but i know women prefer men with my type of build because they keep finding excuses to touch me. it is good. skinny men get girls too,but women feel protected by my side.

im now about 6' feet and 13st 7lbs of muscle if i get bigger i will look too muscular and i dont like that.but im happy with my shape im not a fat-ass,im not skinny-ass. but bigger is better:D . the best way to describe my build is that i have the same build as jonny wilkinson the rugby player.
 

madgame

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
860
Reaction score
1
@pimpfromdayone: Actually we agree on a lot of points. I don't want a girl who's overly superficial either. But then again I mean I have no idea how you look, but unless you're good looking enough (you can be without muscle) chances are you just won't be able to hook up with beautiful girls (which u seem to wanna do also). I bet if you weren't blessed with good enough looks you would be talking differently. I see working out as a possibility to work on yourself and make yourself more attractive. No matter how good or bad you look you can still make yourself more attractive by doing that. But then again you said u actually are all for it, so I see we dont really disagree too much.

When it comes to that slim guy who has an above average chest for example or something, I really agree on that one. I used to think a lot about do women want really muscular guys? Do some actually not like muscles at all? and so on...but really most of them are into men (as their ideal) who are lean, but still have some muscle to offer - as in above average. I've been working out pretty hard and pretty diligently (though Im not obsessed with it and still know other things are more important in life...) and I with my probably average genetics wouldn't have been able to put on that amount of muscle (we're talking like 30 pounds (on most guys that would be less because im fairly tall)) without working pretty diligently for that goal. And most guys who I know who started weight lifting but arent really ambitious in that matter, didnt benefit from it really (as in you can't really tell they've gained any muscle when u see them). So I think the statement the slim above average muscular type of look is easy to attain is wrong. --->
So, I will defend my position and refute your first argument against me by saying, just because YOU got more attention from women doesn't mean ALL men will. In fact, according to the source Screwit identified, average men were favored in most cases, maybe some guys with slightly larger chests, but that is not hard to get.
However I'm not saying anybody needs to go out and pump steel like a bodybuilder. I think that's the problem in this whole discussion and your points. You keep coming up with exaggerated examples of guys benching 400+ lbs to prove your points and keep saying females usually prefer fit/athletic/etc. men...but like I've been saying the whole time: I agree with that. I really dont understand why u keep insisting on this when everyone agrees and use these exaggerated examples like these:

she probably is going to sense a little insecurity if you spend all day in a gym, whether you are or you aren't. Maybe she will make the presumption that you are trying to be able to keep your di-ck up? I don't know....She probably will also know you are not important enough to have anything better to do. It's all about status to them. This is a generalization that all women make.
1. Dont say all women make this generalization and tell me not to make generalizations like if I benefit from weight lifting it doesnt mean ALL men will ;).

2. If you spend ALL DAY in the gym, its quite possible that shell make that generalization. However it is not likely she'll do that, if you go to the gym 3-4 days a week and work out for 1-2 hours.
They won't see that as insecure, but rather as willing to make an effort to change for the better (its more important to females that a man takes care of their looks than we think. Ive been surprised a lot by comments of girls saying how much they liked not only that a guy looks good now, but that he made an effort to change his looks for the better. Actually Ive had girls tell me they didnt need a model or anything, but it was very important for them that a man takes care of his looks and makes the best of his looks.....though of course standing in front of the mirror ALL DAY would make them feel ure insecure too ;)))).



Dont become a big bodybuilder if u think thats gonna get you all the women. Chances are it wont make you more attractive to the average girl (though I think bodybuilders have a good offer/demand-ratio considering women who like that type of build ;))

A good 25-30 pounds of muscle (or maybe a little less or maybe a little more..u get the idea) which in my opinion isnt all that easy to attain for an average guy is definetly worth the effort.

I thought someone asked if muscles will help a lot. I suppose they can get you some loose women for one night stands or something really well, but for relationships and stuff, they are of minimal importance.
Okay, I think it's time to stop discussing this subject right now, but just to tell all the guys who arent working out wondering if they can benefit from working out. This is my experience:

I used to be rather shy and never really got too much attention from girls (though I dont think i was really insecure or ugly)..I never had girls like checking me out or making eye contact or smiling at me on the street..plus I always blew it with those where I did have a chance (due to being 'AFC'). Actually until around 19-20 years old I was a complete loser with girls (Im not a pimp yet and still am not as good an approacher as I'd like to be but that's another story, plus this has improved greatly with my confidence boost..)

So I bulked up over the years and also started wearing clothes that complimented my upperbody (though I don't wear any of those really tight shirts, which look a bit strange or well 'gay' to me) which has really changed the way women perceive me. Not to sound conceited or anything (I know there's still guys looking better than me..even those that dont work out ;)), but everytime I go to a club or I walk through town I have so many girls who a few years ago wouldnt have noticed me at all(though I was never ugly..like I said, also: unfortunately its not like having a great body can make up for having an ugly face or something) checking me out, making (obvious) eye-contact, smiling at me..and I've even had a few girls (who I thought were beautiful) approach me. If I think about now and about like 3-4 years ago, this change is so dramatic that it feels kinda unreal to me (in a positive way).

So, I will defend my position and refute your first argument against me by saying, just because YOU got more attention from women doesn't mean ALL men will.
I'll stop discussing this part, because one of the things I've noticed in life is that a lot of times discussing an argument and trying to prove your point etc. even if people say it's a good and smart thing to do isn't really all that smart, because most of the time it's like person A has opinion A, person B has opinion B and at the end of the discussion person A still has opinion A and person B still has opinion B and all uve achieved is a waste of time (there are exceptions of course..). This right here is a perfect example, I guess lol.

However, anybody who's thinking about should I work out or shouldnt I work out? madgame says it has helped him SO MUCH whereas pimpfromdayone says its not really important. Judge for yourself. Would you rather believe somebody who has done that and tells u about his experience or would u rather believe somebody who hasnt done it (I know you said u were working out yourself, but I assume you are probably cut but not 'muscular' @pimpfromdayone..no offense)? Actually I think it's possible I would think about it the same way, hadn't I seen the benefits that came with it... Plus I don't really understand how he can say only because it has worked for ME doesnt mean it has to work for ALL men. That's kinda like saying: Okay only because he was studying for this test so hard and got an A+ on it, doesnt mean ALL ppl who study will get an A+ on it. Of course it doesnt, but usually it'll still make your grades better (unless you're doing something very wrong, which holds true for weight lifting too ;))...I'm very sure, that I could make any of my friends (none of whom I consider ugly) a whole lot more attractive to the opposite gender, by creating a work out routine and making them eat enough protein/calories (without making them work out or eat like a bodybuilder and going to the gym 24-7). However it takes a while and most of my friends have girlfriends already, etc.
 

xblitz44x

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 10, 2002
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
13
Age
44
You guys are missing the big picture. To figure out the "ideal" male body from a woman's perspectve you'd have to ask EVERY woman.

One woman might prefer a large, muscular guy and wouldn't give the skinny surfer guy the time of day. Another girl might like the skinny build and perceive guys with muscles to be 'meatheads' and would discount them early. However, you won't find many women who consider the body types of Danny DeVito to be 'ideal'.

Women aren't attracted to the bodies themselves, nor the confidence like evvvverybody on this site seems to throw around. They are attracted to the perceived male DOMINANCE. Kurt Cobain blew his brains off and ended his life. Do you think his confidence was high? No. Did he get laid? Yes. Maleness, that was the key. Not "confidence" or muscles.

Woman A looks at Guy and see's muscles. Because her paradigm is so that muscles = maleness, she will feel compelled to him. She won't understand why so she'll attribute it to the muscles.

Girl B looks at G and see's muscles. Her paradigm is such that she perceives muscles to mean "grunting meathead". Grunting Meathead does not equal maleness and the compulsion is not there.

It's that simple. It depends on every girl's perception of each guy. This is why we'll never develop a foolproof 'system' for attracting women.
 

madgame

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
860
Reaction score
1
One more thing I'd like to add:

Michael Cunningham (1990) found that women prefer men with moderately broad shoulders who are of medium height and have a chest slightly larger than average, but not as large and powerful as a traditional body builder’s chest.
I think this is a bit misleading. I agree with it totally, but it doesn't tell you what moderately broad shoulders or a chest slightly larger than average means. In my experience I think the chest I have now is pretty much what most girls I know prefer
(I get a lot of compliments for it ever since it changed to that size and they like to touch it. I know other guys who I would describe as having a 'slightly larger than average chest' but dont really get compliments for their chest)

However (like I said) I packed on around 30lbs of muscle...and I think a lot of ppl will interpret 'slightly above average' as slim and only 10lbs more at the very most and I think thats misleading..
(though it doesn't say Cunningham is wrong by any means, as..if compared to a 'TRADITIONAL BODYBUILDER'S CHEST' such a chest is only slightly above average. My rule of thumb is, that the perfect build is lean, not too bulky, but still enough so your being 'muscular' can be seen clearly when wearing shirts (and maybe sweaters that 'fit' your body rather than being loose).
 

pimpfromdayone

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
676
Reaction score
1
Age
38
Well, you must have missed the whole part about natural selection too. It's a pity.... because my opinion is backed by thousands of years of evolution. Average-Athletic is in. Musclemen are not. Period. The definitions of the two overlap, so perhaps we do have an agreement on this. You're right in that I am "cut," but not that muscular, but if you had girls telling you you were hot (as the skinny athletic guy you are), you wouldn't change yourself either. I am not one of the exceptions to the rule either. You may think you're impressing all the women with your muscle, but really all you're doing is getting some attention that is meaningless. Good, you get more opportunities with women now, but getting opportunities is the easy part, even without muscles. I know, skinny can be "scrawny," so we should all work to be at least average, but past that, it's all EYE CANDY.

Btw, Kurt Cobaine, I would not exactly call a dj... the guy was fu-cking that ugly ass Courtney Love so I don't really give him much credit. He probably banged his share of groupie chicks, but so do all people who have bands.
 

sexualchocolate

Don Juan
Joined
Sep 23, 2001
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Age
47
Location
North Carolina
having a lil size can only help. as opposed to being thin. im 145lbs. and some girls arent attracted bc of that fact. they say im attractive, just too skinny.

guess i better get off my arse and do some pushups.

i prefer petite women anyways. they dont seem to care as much.
they are less likely to be fatties down the line. if a girl has a nice voluptuous body now, 'half' the time they'll be fatties 5 years from now.

trust me just had my ten year reunion
 

pimpfromdayone

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
676
Reaction score
1
Age
38
Haha, that's right man.... after highschool, it's just all downhill from there for most women.
Hel-l yeah, petite women are the best. I suppose my size dictates to a certain extent my taste in women (even though if I were tall I'd still like 'em small) but I'm not after any women who are taller or weigh more than me, haha, that's for sure. Leave the giant bit-ches to the giant guys.
 

Lost In Translation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
11
Location
Australia
i think giving a f*ck about what women want is a waste of time

today women say the want XYZ

but they only date AGP

women say they want a nice guy

we all know they are full of $hit and love bad boys

so when women say they like guys who are whatever

you seriously interested in accepting this data to work with ?


conforming your body shape and size based on Dolly or Cleo's latest poll on the right sized man is a recipe for disaster


there is only one sized man who gets women

AND THATS A MAN WITH GAME


Lost In Translation :D

**AUSTRALIAN STREET PIMP**

" stop being insecure " i hate that saying. it's a cop out for not having enough balls to confront a woman about what she is doing THAT IS WRONG or potentially damaging to a long term relationship. – Lost In Translation
 

madgame

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
860
Reaction score
1
Well, you must have missed the whole part about natural selection too. It's a pity.... because my opinion is backed by thousands of years of evolution. Average-Athletic is in. Musclemen are not.
I really can't believe you still haven't understood that I, too, am of the opinion that athletic-built is (more) in than are 'muscle-men', despite my saying this in probably any of the endless posts in this pointless thread lol. I'll definetly stop talking about this now.

@xblitz44: Of course, every woman isn't attracted to the same type of body. Some like big muscles, some like em skinny. FEW like them fat like Danny Devito. But just as you can say that only few like them fat, I think there's also a certain body type that most women will like. I mean we're exactly the same. Some like em really thin. Some like em a bit bigger. But there's still a certain sort of ideal which most men like (not all but most)...look at the girls in the music videos and dont tell me they aren't what most men are after ;)

It just hit me right upside the head: Why is anyone actually arguing about what body type girls like on guys. It's not really debatable. Just watch some music videos which are made by and for females and thus have 'hot guys' with no shirt on in them. I remember there was this lil kim video "ladiez night". That type of body is what I'm talking about the whole time...or there was this missy elliot video with some guy without a shirt on if anyone remembers..Plus there was this britney spears video on the beach where shes in luv with that due...That's the body type MOST females prefer otherwise they wouldnt choose those guys for their videos. They are neither just 'slim and cut', nor are they very muscular or bodybuilder-like, but still they do have a solid amount of muscle on them.
 

pimpfromdayone

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
676
Reaction score
1
Age
38
I agree with Lost in Translation.

It does seem, however, that we all think athletic (however you define that) is the most attractive to women. They want a man fit enough to fu-ck their brains out, and that is basically it.

And please don't ever mention the words: Lil Kim, Missy Elliot, or Britney Spears, ever again on this message board.
 

madgame

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
860
Reaction score
1
I can't understand why you're hating on my 3 favorite artists.
 
Top