Deus ex Pianoforte said:
So are you saying that you can't find it, or are you saying that you made a mistake (that I never said looks aren't important to men)? Come on, it shouldn't be too hard. You said a COUPLE posts back. Back up your points, show me the quote.
the stupid quote you said was basically along the lines of "women have variance in tastes, some will think one guy is ugly, another will think that other guy is hot, this means looks dont mean ****". <--it is this statement that you made that is just soooo stupid. how the hell does variance in taste equate to women not requiring a guy to look good? do I really need to quote what you actually said for you?, becuase you did say that, and it puts 24 eggs on your face!!! this is what Im talking about, why even try to explain it? I would just avoid bringing attention to it if I were you.
Interesting how you didnt bother to rebut a very strong point I made in my last post (if anything, that would be what you should be rebuting), I also noticed how no one else on yourside of the argument bothered to rebut it either. you know, the point about how its clear hot women are shallow, and that this observation gives the "looks theory" alot of weight and makes your "looks dont matter theory" very lightweight.
Don't tell me what I should rebut. You put words into my mouth, claiming that I made a preposterous declaration that men don't care about looks. If you fail to find the quote (which you will), then your credibility has taken a devastating blow. I can't speak for all the other reasonable people here, but I personally didn't respond to your "very strong point" for reasons I have already laid out, and because I frankly didn't consider it a very strong point at all. I mean, I can destroy it in one sentence.
Most hot women aren't shallow, while you "looks-are-everything" people contend that 100% of them are.
1. I didnt put words in your mouth, you apparently are incoherent of reality and what I said. I was referring to you equating variance in female's taste to evidence that they dont care about looks. not at all did I say you said men dont care about looks; dont confuse that with the analagy
I created which extends your logic over to men, which becomes a contridiction, proving your logic as false. thus, why you have egg on your face. :kick:
2. I noticed you didnt say "0% of women are shallow", this is your way of admitting that some women are in fact shallow. which then means that youre admitting that some women
do require looks. this all goes against your side of the argument, which claims all women are the same, and dont require good looks.
so starting to inch over to my side of the argument huh? keep commin on over
Notice how Im right :yes: