If women knew their place, we wouldn't have these problems.

[sylvester the cat]

I love to watch girls fight..

 

[LiveFreeX]

Women are like that in China... mine is.

 

[( . )( . )]

Believe it or not we used to have like half a dozen legit red pill chicks here. This barrage of "wyminz is oppressed, chained to the sink, smash the patriarchy" meme seems to be at an all time high. Wouldn't surprise me if gaylans invited some loveshack trolls.

 

[Atom Smasher]

Yup, this is definitely an infestation from some other site.

OP, you're spot-on. But the chance of finding a non-delusional woman is close to zero, as we all know.

 

[Syrio]

Oh noez.. A word found in the dictionary not often used, of which was used more than once?

I'm livin on the edge man.

I was just pointing out that you used that word incorrectly, twice. No need to get upset :crazy:

 

[( . )( . )]

I was just pointing out that you used that word incorrectly, twice. No need to get upset :crazy:

Might want to check a dictionary sweety. What else we going to call your manufactured outrage to it all?

faux (foʊ)

adj.
artificial or imitation; fake: faux pearls.
[1670–80; < French]

I would say that about 98-99% of the posts I see on this website are really stupid. I read them because the very few posts that are actually good make it worth it. This post, however, is beyond stupid. I can't even begin to explain why - there's too much.

This is one of the stupidest threads I have ever seen and the original post literally both depresses me (that humans are this dumb) and causes me physical pain to read.

and of course not forgetting this doozy, all from one post lol

Your previous comment on this thread was stupid enough that it didn't deserve a response. This comment, however, is so retarded and ignorant that it NEEDS a response.

You should use your tiny little brain to try to do the same, idiot.

which makes YOU stupid.

but you're displaying your stupidity and inferiority as a human here once again.

This is a good thing you fvcking retard. How the fvck are you this stupid? I seriously don't understand.

The rest of your points are stupid

You are a stupid person and I really, sincerely hope you don't have children.

Oh the pain of the manosphere ....goat faint.

 

[Syrio]

faux (foʊ)

adj.
artificial or imitation; fake: faux pearls.
[1670–80; < French]

Might want to check a dictionary sweety. What else we going to call your manufactured outrage to it all?

If you meant to use it with that definition then that is even worse lol... what you're saying makes no sense. You think I'm pretending to believe that what these people wrote is stupid but I secretly agree with them? :crackup: :crackup: :crackup:

If you believe that then you need to get your brain checked, buddy :crazy:

 

[( . )( . )]

You think I'm pretending to believe that what these people wrote is stupid but I secretly agree with them? :crackup: :crackup: :crackup:

Well duh. It's not like it's a secret fat and or ugly chicks are the only ones whining about the manufactured "evil patriarchy". Just because you don't gain the perks from it that your fairer sisters do (besides, electricity, fresh drinking water, shelter, food, waste disposal etc etc) doesn't mean it's not working like a well oiled machine. Your a screeching libtard sure, but your not as dumb as you make out.

Take this thread for example. We both know your outrage to the OP is a ruse .(might want to google that one too).

 

[pinkfl]

Responses are in bold:

1. Women are supposed to be submissive and obedient to men. Why? If you are saying this because it's "In the bible" then you have to follow it up with the fact that a man and a wife are supposed to have The Lord at the head of all things and that wife is submitting to her spouse to lead her to a righteous life. However, since many of you are okay with premarital relations, don't go to church, and generally say that religion is a bunch of hogwash, then you don't have the right to cherrypick dated biblical phrases just because you feel they suit you. Period. End of discussion.
2. Women are supposed to respect men. Cool. Then men need to respect and protect women. You know. Be real men and stuff.
3. Women are supposed to trust men. It's pretty hard to "trust men" when women can't even walk down the street without getting hollered at, honked at, followed, and generally harassed just because they have boobs. Deny it all you like, but it happens all the time and it has nothing to do with what they are wearing.
4. Women should never be "over" men in any capacity whatsoever. False. Men and women are complements. Ying and Yang. They should work together to show their strengths. A woman is going to be better at some things than men, and a man is going to be better at some things than a woman.
5. When a woman falls in love and gets married, she should BELONG to that man and change her name and bank account over to express this unity. :crackup: Lol at "belong". You need your head examined. A person isn't property.
6. After a woman is married, the man should be the head of the wife, and the man should get to tell the woman how to run her life and she should LIKE it. No, upon marriage, the couple is a "team", because they are each other's complement. They are each other's biggest priority. If the man wants to sleeparound and have a mistress, should the woman just be a doormat and put her health at risk because the "head" said so? No.
7. After a woman is married, the woman should scrap her career if possible, take care of domestic things and raising children, and she should LIKE it. This is pure economic foolishness. A dual-earning household has a lot more stability than a sole-wage earning household. If one person gets disabled or laid off, then bills will still get paid and the family unit will not fall apart due to this crisis. If your wife has nothing to offer but a pretty face, then you're in big trouble the day your company downsizes, some idiot rear ends you while driving, or some medical expense hits.
All your post tells me is that you have never seen a healthy relationship and you probably never will. But hey, I'm sure you'll attract loads of women if you hand them this list on the first date.
If a woman does not fall into this simple list of NATURAL woman laws (as uncool and as un-PC as they may appear), why waste time pursuing her?

 

[lgbs2004]

I wanna make one thing crystal clear
When I want an ice cold beer
Get it real quick and say "yes, dear"
Those are the words that I wanna hear
We’ll get along - you will see
Focus on taking care of me
You gotta make me a priority
Cuz I’m a pretty *****in’ commodity
Dear old dad, now he’s dead
But when he was alive he always said
"Make those *****es take care of you
Cause that’s what women were born to do!"

 

[Syrio]

Well duh. It's not like it's a secret fat and or ugly chicks are the only ones whining about the manufactured "evil patriarchy". Just because you don't gain the perks from it that your fairer sisters do (besides, electricity, fresh drinking water, shelter, food, waste disposal etc etc) doesn't mean it's not working like a well oiled machine. Your a screeching libtard sure, but your not as dumb as you make out.

Take this thread for example. We both know your outrage to the OP is a ruse .(might want to google that one too).

You said "your" instead of "you're". Also your part about ugly chicks not having drinking water, shelter, food etc doesn't make sense - and if you're going to go there, I know plenty of both attractive and unattractive women who are of higher status and make more money than you and the majority of the posters on this forum. Also, as you are well aware, I'm male.

There is a difference between being all pro-women-y and being down to earth. I'm not the "smash the patriarchy, power to the women" type of person that you think I am at all. I look at these issues objectively and base my opinions off of sound research and objective evidence. Most of the people here (possibly yourself included) base their opinions of gender on emotions. They feel anger towards women so they take on the belief that women are inferior as a defense mechanism. You can laugh at this and claim that I'm wrong but that won't help you prove anything.

 

[Jaylan]

pinkfl got it right Id say.

 

[Syrio]

Also yeah pinkfl is very right. Props for actually taking the time to point out all of the ridiculous flaws with OP's post.

 

[Darth]

Responses are in bold:

Aren't you that overweight, tattooed girl who claims to be bisexual?

I can't quote your post, so let me copy and paste so I can address it.

1. Women are supposed to be submissive and obedient to men. Why? If you are saying this because it's "In the bible" then you have to follow it up with the fact that a man and a wife are supposed to have The Lord at the head of all things and that wife is submitting to her spouse to lead her to a righteous life. However, since many of you are okay with premarital relations, don't go to church, and generally say that religion is a bunch of hogwash, then you don't have the right to cherrypick dated biblical phrases just because you feel they suit you. Period. End of discussion.LOL. End of discussion because you say so? For the record, I am Catholic and so the doctrine to which you refer is neither cherrypicked nor dated. Actually society was following it as late as the 1960s. Nice try though.
2. Women are supposed to respect men. Cool. Then men need to respect and protect women. You know. Be real men and stuff. True. But how many men really want to protect a slvt? I'm not saying it's not their duty, but when most of modern women are slvts, it hardly brings out our caring instincts.
3. Women are supposed to trust men. It's pretty hard to "trust men" when women can't even walk down the street without getting hollered at, honked at, followed, and generally harassed just because they have boobs. Deny it all you like, but it happens all the time and it has nothing to do with what they are wearing. Men undergo lots of discrimination too. The fact remains that in the past, women trusted men much more than they do today and this was a great good.
4. Women should never be "over" men in any capacity whatsoever. False. Men and women are complements. Ying and Yang. They should work together to show their strengths. A woman is going to be better at some things than men, and a man is going to be better at some things than a woman.This is an idiotic comment. I already said previously that what I mean by "over" is "in authority over". A woman should not have authority over grown men. Period. You are not built for it.
5. When a woman falls in love and gets married, she should BELONG to that man and change her name and bank account over to express this unity. Lol at "belong". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYd_8I44YL8 You need your head examined. A person isn't property.Did I say a wife belonging to her husband meant that she was his property? This feminist shaming does not work with me.
6. After a woman is married, the man should be the head of the wife, and the man should get to tell the woman how to run her life and she should LIKE it. No, upon marriage, the couple is a "team", because they are each other's complement. They are each other's biggest priority. If the man wants to sleeparound and have a mistress, should the woman just be a doormat and put her health at risk because the "head" said so? No.Marriage is not a "team". Marriage is a leader and a helper. And no, the man shouldn't sleep around. Completely beside the point.
7. After a woman is married, the woman should scrap her career if possible, take care of domestic things and raising children, and she should LIKE it. This is pure economic foolishness. A dual-earning household has a lot more stability than a sole-wage earning household. If one person gets disabled or laid off, then bills will still get paid and the family unit will not fall apart due to this crisis. If your wife has nothing to offer but a pretty face, then you're in big trouble the day your company downsizes, some idiot rear ends you while driving, or some medical expense hits.What you call foolishness I call COMMON SENSE. Women are not meant to be "career women"- they are meant to take care of the brood. From a relationship standpoint, it is best if possible to have man as the breadwinner.
All your post tells me is that you have never seen a healthy relationship and you probably never will. But hey, I'm sure you'll attract loads of women if you hand them this list on the first date.And there we go with the typical female attack. Completely personal, not objective. An attempt to hurt my feelings. Nice

 

[( . )( . )]

Also, as you are well aware, I'm male.

If that's true that makes it even worse. You poor phuck.

I look at these issues objectively and base my opinions off of sound research and objective evidence.

The TV is not sound research.

You said "your" instead of "you're".

Swype and you'll get what YOUR given.

 

[Syrio]

If that's true that makes it even worse. You poor phuck.



The TV is not sound research.

Look at my past posts and you'll see that I've cited multiple sources in the points I've made. I've cited reputable articles, university studies, and published books.

At this point it clearly doesn't matter though, your response screams out that you can't think of anything to say because you know I'm right, so you just throw out random accusations and insult me.

GG thanks for playing

P.S. There is no shame in recognizing that you were wrong about something and even changing your opinion based on an argument. I've had discussions like this with people before where they turned out to make some really good points and my set of beliefs about the subject changed as a result. That's called being open-minded and intelligent.

 

[djgirl]

Pinkfl and syrio seem to be the only intelligent and reasonable posters on this forum and bradd aswell!

Its funny how most of you are all so jaded about women, that your logic has gone out of the water and you cant reason with any of you because you are all caught up in your 1950s mindset and havent got with the times.

 

[user name]

Shush djgirl. The girls are in the middle of a fight.

Continue girls, please.

 

[( . )( . )]

Pinkfl and syrio seem to be the only intelligent and reasonable posters on this forum

Imagine that.

you cant reason with any of you because you are all caught up in your 1950s mindset and havent got with the times.

Woman-ese for "settle with a fat chick who's covered in tatts and confused about gender roles". Only beta herblings have to "get with the times". Out of necessity more than anything. Guys who are good at this sh!t don't have to.

so you just throw out random accusations and insult me.

Your previous comment on this thread was stupid enough that it didn't deserve a response. This comment, however, is so retarded and ignorant that it NEEDS a response.

You should use your tiny little brain to try to do the same, idiot.

which makes YOU stupid.

but you're displaying your stupidity and inferiority as a human here once again.

This is a good thing you fvcking retard. How the fvck are you this stupid? I seriously don't understand.

The rest of your points are stupid

You are a stupid person and I really, sincerely hope you don't have children.

When fainting goats phuck up....and did I mention that was all from the one post?

 

[CrimsonPanther]

Woah dude. Chill out a little.

she is not a dude, she is just another female who tries to stir things up, troll and spread feminist copy/pasta. just ignore her, same with that noodle girl, and the dj girl, and sirio et al. they're a waste of characters.
nutcases who don't want to understand what others say, they just search for excuses to be *******s.
i have nothing against girls sharing their views (although i don't really care about it), but these drama-queens are caricatures. it is not about difference in opinion, far from it. i don't mind if someone has other views. but straight up lying to prove a false point, and incoherently babbling trash when it suits their needs is the shining example of the negative traits of women.
wanna get a quality girl? if she resembles these attention seeking excuses for a female (some of them try to pose as men), next her. she is anything but quality.

as for OP, aye 'tis so.
differences should not be banished, they should be used to complement each other. not as master/slave, but cooperation. there are things women do better. there are things men do better. problem is that the things women do better were labeled shameful and lowly by the feminist manipulators (and some men with the intelligence of a mentally challenged slug). they made men's traits the noble and followable way, and the women's way something to be ashamed of.

these weirdos imported from some other forum just see the word "gender role" and they get glowing red eyes, enter rage mode and spread hate in every direction. they are the product of this mass manipulation.

the good thing is, there ARE women who embrace their role, the things they are good at. and thankfully, they mostly are above the HV7 looks (having less insecurities).

the only ones bytching are the uglies and the socially retarded ones with zero tolerance for others. the ones who want to be accepted without THEM having to change a bit. egotistical losers.