no... gay men are basically spoiled by choice. since there is no restrain, the average gay man will have a lot more partners than the average woman.
Women only think about themselves. They don't think about other women. What if other women want to be approached? A simple trick for women who do not want to be hit on is to wear a ring. It will cut down on a lot of approaches. Another tactic is to wear frumpy cloths and not wear makeup.
What would you say is the realistic age window from which women start to experience a decline?
This is very interesting and I think it's quite accurate, I've met many girls who've had a multitude of men providing different things to them. All the men want the same thing (to lay her) but she wants different things from them and only sees them in their neat category.
I think the problem is we men would wish to have an easy abundance of female attention. Our community preaches and often times idealizes the goal of developing an abundance of women. Women seem to have this abundance over men automatically by the simple fact of being (ofcourse with a level of acceptable physical looks), added on with the gender and dating dynamic being that they are the ones that are pursued by us. So it's hard to imagine how having an abundance of attention would be negative to them. If I had an easy and effortless abundance of attention, I would feel empowered in the dating sphere. Yes it does not mean I would entertain all attention, obviously I would have my pick over girls that I truly desired. But it just seems easier for them that they just wait and see what happens. I've experienced this in past dating with multiple plates that were very into me, I was not really into them but their attention entertained me during moments of boredom, they sort of spun themselves and I imagine women have this feeling x10 or maybe even x100 times more.
This is such an amazing view. Thank you for sharing.
This is so true. Increasingly I am starting to see that a woman's presence in a man's life is extremely conditional based on my past experiences. Unlike romantic notions of love, a woman's presence in your life is actually very fickle. The moment you become an inconvenience to them, you're out. Yet if they are an inconvenience to you, our society through culture (romance, being a good man, shaming, etc) and legal institutions (marriage) forces you to deal with it. Women are forever the victims and we get repercussions if we really exude or act on any emotional instability we feel from them.
What do you think is the consequence of them settling for their 'not-first-choice', is it a life of secret resentment for them? Or will they inevitably cheat?
This is great sharing. In a way, I sort of get it. On the reverse side from the perspective of men who have abundance, I feel many women go out on dates pretending to be chill and casual with you but secretly they want to tie you down if you have high SMV. Obviously I am talking about the women who are not worthy. They are sneaky about it. They might even put up up with you, use their cooch, have great sex with it. But gradually, they start to bring up or introduce the LTR element. It almost feels like being hunted at times, like a hunter with a trap and snare. Its tiring at times to think many women who hangout with you might want to tie you down when sometimes you're really just leaving it up in the air, see how things progress but many of these women are desperate.
What if the guys who are approaching you are actually attractive guys? Do you feel good? Would you entertain them a bit longer than the others? And what if they are, by impression, substantially better than your bf? Do you make friends with them? Exchange contacts? Again you have an anonymous account so hope you can share openly about it.
That's true. Once I was on a phone with one of my plates, our conversation was interrupted when someone tried to approach her even while she was not the phone. Pretended to ask for directions then tried to chat her up.
I don't think it's set in stone...I don't know if you've seen Salma Hayek lately, but she's 57...and she can still absolutely get it.
As have I and it usually leads to split brat entitled behaviours which men should by default find very unattractive in women. ( I certainly do )
This is very interesting! Would you like to expand?
Do major 3 examples of this please and how to solve em.
This quote indirectly say that a woman know how to connect with a man by default.
When I was younger, I used to rely mostly on my verbal skills to reel women in. I'm not photogenic, but women like my face. Not instantly, but women often claimed they were attracted to my mischievous green eyes. I was obviously having fun and they wanted to be part of that.
Men and women have different motivations, and are judged by culture different. Behavior is the same. A man that has no problems getting women will behave the same way women behave. I agree it is rare, the man has to have great looks, is famous, and has a lot of disposable income does not have problems getting women.... so he really doesn't value sex. All you have to do is look at men that fit this category. For even the average woman, getting lots of men is easy, so she really doesn't value sex... it's just another biological function that has to be done like sleep and eating.
A man has to be honest and un-apologetic about who he is and what he is and wants. This runs in direct opposition to all the PUA stuff that is out there. You have to abandon all the 'game' techniques. Game is fine, if all you want to do is bang chicks and more on, but if a man is looking for a connection that can be maintained he has to be painfully honest.
I disagree. men will have a lot of sex with a lot of women IF THEY COULD. Woman on average do not do this. it's biological. for every woman who has slept with a hundred men, there is a man who has slept with a thousand women.
