It doesn't matter if a guy is successful with women or not, really. Some are here to share knowledge and others are here to learn. Some are here to help them only get sex while others are here to learn how to have successful relationships. Now, I don't really get what anyone on here thinks they have to gain by flaming me. I mean...I don't want to date anyone here and trying to convince other guys on here you are a stronger man by trying to "put me in my place" is just plain retarded. I was a competitve debator, ran an extremely volatile forum for a year and have done battle with the best flamers on the web. No amount of flaming is going to chase me off this site. I've been here 5 years...and there have been far better flamers who have tried to chase me off than any of the current ones could ever hope to be. So...if you're not impressing anyone and can't win...what is the point? It's a waste of time and energy that would be much better spent doing something productive.
Don't like my post...then offer a cohesive argument to the post. It's not that hard. Yeah, I'll counter what you post because, again...I was a competitive debator...if someone argues my point I will continue to argue it back and forth until the other person gives in. It only stoops to flaming when someone else makes it personal instead of sticking to the ideas and views and opinions on the subject.
Should I be banned for being a good debator? No, I shouldn't. Should I be banned for striking back at personal attacks if those who attack are not being dealt with appropriately? No, I shouldn't. Should I be banned if I just flame someone who did nothing to invite it? Yep, then I would deserve it...as long as everyone else who does the same also gets banned.
Consistency is the key here. That's all I'm asking for. If Allen doesn't want to enforce his TOS, that's his right and business...but if it's not going to be enforced with one person it should not be enforced with anyone.