jhonny9546
Master Don Juan
This passage really resonates.
Mostly, the statement "How you think and what you are programmed to think is a lie. This causes her to keep her legs closed to you because you are not making her go feminine" could be presented in a simpler and more understandable way.
Yes, we've brainstormed, but now, how do we know which behaviors are correct?
The easiest thing that comes to mind is to emulate the behavior of those men who are considered "masculine." However, you need to be close to one of them to truly understand what his life is like.
For anyone who grew up without a masculine father and instead had a mother who "brainstormed" him, implementing this can be quite challenging.
So, you're also suggesting that while you can learn theory and implement it through exposure, "thus, it will always only be a marginal tool of use."
What do you mean by that? What are the superior elements that we are not mentioning?
I quote this because it's something that I've noticed in my real-life experiences: "manipulator" and "persuader." Nowadays, it's the attractive one who gets everything—jobs, social circles, women, and anything else.They don’t respect the man with the skills, the fastest man, the strongest. The respect the manipulator and social climber who gets the others to do his work for him.
Women who choose this kind of man know they will be manipulated, yet they still choose him somehow.
Women wants to be manipulated.[/QUOTE]
A friend of mine went from "backoffice" job, managing others pc, to being "meeting attendant", managing meetings and other people.if you can get a title from a corporation--most people's frames are so weak, and most people are so desperate to have someone give them any sense of direction, that people will follow you.
All the woman in his office, now see him as an attractive men.
This is what are you talking about.
This is not 100% complete.“A leader must be competent”
This is false. Period. There are a plethora of incompetent leaders and guys like me who capitalize on businesses owned by incompetent leaders.
Competency is not a requirement to lead.
Competency in leading is a a requirement to an effective leader.
Simple logic here. Try to understand this time.
What about someone who is not competent, and which is leading?
Why he/she is leading?
Manipulation skills
Last edited: