A Keyboard Jockey tries to give sound good advice but can't answer with real examples or experience. I tried having a conversation with you and it's become pointless with your evasive angry tone. You're giving the same meaningless advice telling guys not to commit to sluts who already have. You're gf could be a slut too since you're unsure about the number of men she's fvcked. Men need to be proactive not committing to sluts. You're shoddy advice is reactive that does nothing to help men avoid sluts. Looks like you will find out the hard way in your own relationship.
Danger said:
It adds no value to the conversation. It is irrelevant. If you have an issue with the study or the word "slut", then say so. You don't need my definition to go down that road.
It's not irrelevant, it adds enormous value to the conversation. You're afraid to give your definition of a slut for some odd reason. I have an issue with you evading the questions on sluts. You're afraid to really judge sluts when it matters. I have an issue with your advice when you are telling men not to commit to sluts, who already were committed to one for months. It makes the whole point of your advice irrelevant.
Danger said:
Because it's irrelevant. I told you this a million times. If you have an issues with the study or the definition of slut, then state it.
It's not irrelevant. You're scared to say what your definition of a slut is. I have an issue with you evading the definition of a slut. We can't discuss the study or help men understand sluts when you're evading the true definition of a slut. You're afraid to judge sluts when it matters.
Danger said:
Don't commit to sluts, and if you find your current commitment is to a slut, then dump her. Simple.
I called you a Keyboard Jockey for this reason. You're telling men not to commit to sluts who already have been committed to a slut for months. Your reactive advice is pointless and irrelevant showing you have no experience. You're evading all the tough questions on sluts for that reason.
What about a guy who married a slut? What about a guy living with a slut? He would get screwed with your shoddy KJ advice. Keyboard Jockeys claim it's simple when it's not. Many things can go wrong when you commit to a slut. Appears you don't know that either claiming it's simple.
Danger said:
They already would have, but they can fix that, by dumping her. I am trying to get YOU to understand that. But it keeps going over your head. So why is this an issue again?
The damage has already been done by committing to a slut for months. It keeps going over your head. Your reactive Keyboard Jockey advice is pointless and irrelevant when you're saying not to commit to sluts when it's already been done. You're uncertain about how many men your gf has fvcked. She could be a slut with high numbers too and you're committed to her.
Danger said:
You are calling me names because I will not let you drag this into a "define slut" war.
Looks like you're afraid to judge slutty women since you refuse to give a definition of a slut.
Why can't you share the lowest sexual partner number count you accept? Does it bother you to talk about your gf's past sexual conquests? Why do you want to protect sluts not defining what they are?
'
Danger said:
Again, wrong. I am confident it's low based upon my experience and slut-tells, not assuming. There is a difference. You just keep ignoring that statement, which is not surprising considering how this discussion is going.
Keyboard Jockeys are always vague on real information. You're assuming since you have no clue how many men your gf has fvcked. She could have been in 8 relationships going over your personal sexual partner number count. With your definition she would be a slut not showing any slut tells. All of this is relevant to the discussion of sluts. You're evading it each time you're asked to give a definition.
Danger said:
Moreover your anger at "shoddy advice" shows how mad you are then men are judging women such as yourself on how many men you've fvked.
Ah, look at this. A weak insult coming from a Keyboard Jockey. You're refusing to judge sluts by evading the questions that determine a slut. You're trying to protect sluts and not define them for what they are. This conversation is reached it's end. You're evading the subject of sluts moving the direction of this discussion to a pointless argument. Continue on giving your irrelevant KJ advice trying to sound experienced.