Courtney Ryan made a video about inexperienced men

Manure Spherian

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 16, 2023
Messages
1,285
Reaction score
1,144
Age
46
The environment that most Boomers grew up in was a different environment that the upbringing for Generation X.

My parents were born in the early 1950s. Their formative years would have been the 1950s - 1960s.

The majority of Gen X'ers were the children born in the 2nd half of the 1960s and the first half of the 1970s. Late 1970s and 1980 births are classified as Gen X. There is that Xennial phrase for late 1970s/early 1980s births. Technically, that label would be applicable for me. I have never bought the Xennial label for myself as I have felt my experiences have been more of a true Gen Y/Millennial experience.

Boomers were raised with more stable family units, especially the first 2/3rds of that generation. Late Boomers (1959-1964 births) had a somewhat different experience as no fault divorce entered most USA states by the 1970s. Divorces skyrocketed in the 1970s and some late Boomers might have felt that during childhood. However, most of the earliest wave of divorcees had Generation X children. This is why Generation X children were called latchkey children.

The 1970s-1980s were a transitional era in the sexual marketplace. The Sexual Revolution that started in the 1960s was starting to become solidified during the 1970s-1980s era. Due to its transitional nature, the 1970s-1980s had some elements leftover from a past time but started us down the path where we've gotten today.

The latchkey kid environment that Generation X children faced affected their worldview. I don't think that transitional era during their formative years helped them either.

It was uncommon in Generation X for male incels to exist. The most well known Generation X incel/borderline incel was Neil Strauss. Strauss was born in 1969. He got a bachelor's degree from an Ivy League school and had a decent journalism job. These achievements in the 1990s were not getting Strauss laid. Strauss wasn't getting laid until he became a seduction student of fellow Gen X'er Mystery and other notable PUAs. Neil Strauss pre-Mystery and other PUAs was mostly incel due to his 5'6" height and premature balding.

By the time that Generation Y/Millennial male were reaching their teens and early 20s, the incidence of incels/borderline incels were becoming more common.
I also want to add, which bears repeating, this sort of unregulated market has it so that females are getting experience way earlier than the average young male. Feral women do not like womanless men. This creates a catch-22. I'm unsure if I would even advise a high school guy to screw considering he has no way to adequately provide for a family, but abstaining leads to unattractiveness. And if a man reaches his early 20's womanless his whole life so far, he might be screwed, blued, and tattooed.

Inceldom is a vicious circle. Social ostracism or alienation can lead to inceldom. Inceldom causes further social ostracism or alienation. A friend from my past once said, "the dumbest feeling is being a womanless man around other men with women". I remember that feeling all too well. Being some lone guy at a wedding, beach, party, or out and about where young people were (at a mall, say) was f-cking awful.

The above sentiment is why I am not against taking women from their boyfriends (I do not advise being involved with married women for serious reasons and that's a whole other story) if marriage is not on the table for them. I mean, in the above post, I explained a situation in which damn near every young female had a boyfriend. That means in order for a guy to get a girlfriend, he'd have to take one. I remember working at a part-time job at a clothing store while in college, and at the end of one night shift, several cars were lined up outside of the store in which there were boyfriends for damn near all my female co-workers. I doubt any married those guys.
 

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
13,879
Reaction score
11,577
A friend from my past once said, "the dumbest feeling is being a womanless man around other men with women". I remember that feeling all too well. Being some lone guy at a wedding, beach, party, or out and about where young people were (at a mall, say) was f-cking awful.
Yes, that happens. It's a common feeling for unattached men or marginally attached after age 30.

I have a good example. In my social circle, there was a wedding in 2017. There were slightly over 100 attendees at this wedding. Do you know how many unattached females between the ages of 21-39 attended this wedding? The answer to that question is 0.

I didn't attend this wedding but I know there were unattached males between 21-39 at it.

A lot of private residence parties become couples majority of couple only parties after age 30. I mentioned this phenomenon in the thread below.


I am not against taking women from their boyfriends
I'm not either. Most men should try to push back on the IHAB line if they ever hear it with "boyfriend destroyer lines".
 

Manure Spherian

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 16, 2023
Messages
1,285
Reaction score
1,144
Age
46
Yes, that happens. It's a common feeling for unattached men or marginally attached after age 30.

I have a good example. In my social circle, there was a wedding in 2017. There were slightly over 100 attendees at this wedding. Do you know how many unattached females between the ages of 21-39 attended this wedding? The answer to that question is 0.

I didn't attend this wedding but I know there were unattached males between 21-39 at it.
I late concluded that unmarried couples, in many cases, were not headed for marriage and in many cases worthless. I suspect some women attend places with men for appearance and status, not because they are madly in love with boyfriends and headed to form families with them. What's your take on this?
 

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
13,879
Reaction score
11,577
I late concluded that unmarried couples, in many cases, were not headed for marriage and in many cases worthless.
It's true. My social circle has been somewhat of an exception to this. A lot of the relationships that got to 2 years resulted in marriage.

I suspect some women attend places with men for appearance and status, not because they are madly in love with boyfriends and headed to form families with them.
It depends on the event. In a lot of cases, what you're saying is accurate.

In that 2017 wedding I mentioned above, it was attended by a lot of couples that were already married, already engaged, or were in serious relationships. After that wedding happened, I heard that a woman in a longer term relationship gave her boyfriend an ultimatum for marriage at the reception.
 

maturin

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2025
Messages
8
Reaction score
10
Age
62
There were plenty on incels back in the 80s.i was there. The same dynamics applied. Guys had to work and make a strong effort for it. A girl just stood their looking pretty making judgements. No real effort required. Same shyt. Your dad didn't help with dating bec all you'd get was BP platitudes from a boomer. Your lucky you got no advice.

Your right on point about the 70s transition. This is where the big turning point came. The men got everything wrong bec the power resided with the women. They missed this. Modern man the past couple of decades has grossly undervalued what he offers. Long term commitment. And what that entails. My advice is holdback on this and dont piss it away like most guys do. Our modern predecessors were a very confused, naive, and evenstupid group of guys who created a mess that you guys have figured out but are left dealing with and forced to clean up. The era of Monogamy brought a low end genetics to our species. The off spring are these simps and very low grade beta omega males. Letsbe thankful they won't breed. Future generations then by very definition must improve physically and mentally. Women by asserting choice are disproving everything our predecessors believed and made up. It all flies in the face of the religious love soulmate narrative invented by culture and religion and is far more in line with Natural selection.

Lastly your claim that men need relationships for sex. Yes and no. Not really. Most marriages are sexless. You need to distinguish dating and marriage. Men get the suck in modern marriage. It no longer works and younger guys are not picking up on this and the reasons fit it. Apples and oranges brother.
The environment that most Boomers grew up in was a different environment that the upbringing for Generation X.

My parents were born in the early 1950s. Their formative years would have been the 1950s - 1960s.

The majority of Gen X'ers were the children born in the 2nd half of the 1960s and the first half of the 1970s. Late 1970s and 1980 births are classified as Gen X. There is that Xennial phrase for late 1970s/early 1980s births. Technically, that label would be applicable for me. I have never bought the Xennial label for myself as I have felt my experiences have been more of a true Gen Y/Millennial experience.

Boomers were raised with more stable family units, especially the first 2/3rds of that generation. Late Boomers (1959-1964 births) had a somewhat different experience as no fault divorce entered most USA states by the 1970s. Divorces skyrocketed in the 1970s and some late Boomers might have felt that during childhood. However, most of the earliest wave of divorcees had Generation X children. This is why Generation X children were called latchkey children.

The 1970s-1980s were a transitional era in the sexual marketplace. The Sexual Revolution that started in the 1960s was starting to become solidified during the 1970s-1980s era. Due to its transitional nature, the 1970s-1980s had some elements leftover from a past time but started us down the path where we've gotten today.

The latchkey kid environment that Generation X children faced affected their worldview. I don't think that transitional era during their formative years helped them either.

It was uncommon in Generation X for male incels to exist. The most well known Generation X incel/borderline incel was Neil Strauss. Strauss was born in 1969. He got a bachelor's degree from an Ivy League school and had a decent journalism job. These achievements in the 1990s were not getting Strauss laid. Strauss wasn't getting laid until he became a seduction student of fellow Gen X'er Mystery and other notable PUAs. Neil Strauss pre-Mystery and other PUAs was mostly incel due to his 5'6" height and premature balding.

By the time that Generation Y/Millennial male were reaching their teens and early 20s, the incidence of incels/borderline incels were becoming more common.
 

Create self-fulfilling prophecies. Always assume the positive. Assume she likes you. Assume she wants to talk to you. Assume she wants to go out with you. When you think positive, positive things happen.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Manure Spherian

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 16, 2023
Messages
1,285
Reaction score
1,144
Age
46
Women by asserting choice are disproving everything our predecessors believed and made up. It all flies in the face of the religious love soulmate narrative invented by culture and religion and is far more in line with Natural selection.
This supposes women are eugenic breeders. They’ve proven they aren’t. What we have now actually is dysgenic breeding subsidized by slave labor (the state, ex husbands).

I know this is incongruent with a seduction website, but polygamy, especially unstructured polygamy is harmful to society, as we are witnessing.

What would be eugenic, but will not be done in the retarded USA, are certain social measures to pair up the brightest and beautiful early, as was proposed in the book The Case for Father Custody.
 
Last edited:
Top