Cheerios Commercial Featuring Mixed Race Family Gets Racist Backlash (VIDEO)

[Who Dares Win]

To all who deny the existence of any "tribe mentality" or consider it a lesser evoluted factor while pushing the almighty card of "insecurity", do you realize that in this same thread two distinct factions emerged to support opposing points and such factions can be listed as different "tribes" in term of race?

We can like it or not but its like that, and no matter how many bullsh1t and manipulations, nor shaming and reproaching will be depolyed, such things will still matter.

Again I think the point of my lines about indian guys first and latvian ones later threatening me was clear that any group of men claim territory over "their" women, but apparently somebody skipped that line, Im not talking about any particular race but he whole men gender (at least those whose tests are still in place).

To deny the territorial factor of men, in terms of sex, property and home its not only pointless but stupid, kinda reminds me one of those weed rainbow dreams from 60s leftists.

 

[( . )( . )]

Kate Upton is an average girl in my view anyways. Skinny girl with saggy breats and no tone. No thanks lol.

An angry black leftoid obsessed with whitey with an unusual fondness for all things faggot.


Elbows too pointy.


At least you still give the odd lolz gaylan.

 

[Jaylan]

An angry black leftoid obsessed with whitey with an unusual fondness for all things faggot.

Elbows too pointy.

At least you still give the odd lolz gaylan.

Please do cry sum moar brah :crackup:

And Im obsessed with whitey? Says the guy constantly whining about "the left", blacks and gays. Whos really obsessed? Grow a pair and stop worrying about who other people screw.

Man, this forum has some pathetic members. I dont see ANY other PUA forum have so much beta whining in it.

To all who deny the existence of any "tribe mentality" or consider it a lesser evoluted factor while pushing the almighty card of "insecurity", do you realize that in this same thread two distinct factions emerged to support opposing points and such factions can be listed as different "tribes" in term of race?

We can like it or not but its like that, and no matter how many bullsh1t and manipulations, nor shaming and reproaching will be depolyed, such things will still matter.

Again I think the point of my lines about indian guys first and latvian ones later threatening me was clear that any group of men claim territory over "their" women, but apparently somebody skipped that line, Im not talking about any particular race but he whole men gender (at least those whose tests are still in place).

To deny the territorial factor of men, in terms of sex, property and home its not only pointless but stupid, kinda reminds me one of those weed rainbow dreams from 60s leftists.

Im not denying that men are territorial at all. I said that both some men and women get jealous when their opposite sex racial counterparts date a different race. However, I also said that we dont see groups respond with the same anger and organization as white men do.

I dont see asian men, black women, latino men or whomever else, create threads specifically for the purpose of hating on people who date inter-racially. Heck, some white dudes create websites for the sole purpose of hating on other races (stormfront), or specifically to hate on black people (chimpout). Thats how pathetic its becoming. They even have sub-forums dedicated to discussing racial mixing.

I dont hear other groups of people throwing racial slurs at others for wanting to mix up who they date. I see many white guys do this though, which is why I think the good point was made that some white guys cant stand getting knocked off their perch as the most desirable male.

And it seems to especially bruise some of those guys egos if a desirable female is with a black man. Your tribal explanation doesnt explain that bit of insecurity and racism we see from certain white guys. So again, while you do have a bit of a point, the anti-race mixing attitude is way more pronounced amongst a certain group of white dudes.

 

[Hustlaz Ambition]

Say what you want cupcake. But the "tribe" mentality is absolutely true. Travel the world and see for yourself. It's just how men are.

And of course, the foreign men will use the tool of their choice to gain access to those racially foreign women. And Who Dares is right, that one of those tools is shaming of the local men for being "butthurt" or "bitter".

Having said that, I agree with much of what Playher says. But if one is too afraid of the reality where they have to start shaming men for using every tool they can to keep women, then that is that person's problem.

You use shaming to secure racially foreign women from men of similar race. Similar methods by those men will be used to keep you from mating with those women. It's nature. When you compete for resources, everybody gets butthurt, not just one side.

Point is, if racially foreign men are using everything to their advantage to get the pretty white woman (as Playher suggests), why should white men not use everything to their advantage to do the same? Why shame the white man when he starts to push back?

Because the white man is now an obstacle to the goal.

Now that you bring it up some foreign men do see the white man as an obstacle. I've noticed this especially in Europe with the Paki/Indian invasion over there. I heard 90% of the rapes are done over there by Muslims(can anyone confirm this?). Asian men hating whites is well documented http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/2212311 . Hispanics seem to be pretty chill on that issue, except the Mexicans, with all their Viva La Raza talk. I don't know any blacks who hate whites, if anything blacks feel the need to be around whites, or we don't really see them as an obstacle, our interracial stats prove it. Uncle Ruckus is more than a fictional character :crackup: . The ones who do hate whites tend to be the older types like Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, or broke negros who think the "white man took everything", Or who tells educated blacks they "Talk and act white". Race relation between black/white is no where near as bad as the media tries to make it.

 

[PlayHer Man]

To all who deny the existence of any "tribe mentality" or consider it a lesser evoluted factor while pushing the almighty card of "insecurity", do you realize that in this same thread two distinct factions emerged to support opposing points and such factions can be listed as different "tribes" in term of race?

We can like it or not but its like that, and no matter how many bullsh1t and manipulations, nor shaming and reproaching will be depolyed, such things will still matter.

Again I think the point of my lines about indian guys first and latvian ones later threatening me was clear that any group of men claim territory over "their" women, but apparently somebody skipped that line, Im not talking about any particular race but he whole men gender (at least those whose tests are still in place).

To deny the territorial factor of men, in terms of sex, property and home its not only pointless but stupid, kinda reminds me one of those weed rainbow dreams from 60s leftists.

No one denied the "territorial nature of men". All I said was men with options act accordingly and tend to be less possessive of women. Beta faggots cling to one woman like glue and cry when a man of a different race pulls an attractive woman from their race. If that's not insecurity then tell me what is.

Guess what? Someone being the same race as you doesn't make them your "territory" any more than someone with the same hair color, eye color or foot size. :crackup: :crackup:

YOU DON'T "OWN" THE PEOPLE OF YOUR RACE. So the point you're making is moot.

 

[Who Dares Win]

No one denied the "territorial nature of men". All I said was men with options act accordingly and tend to be less possessive of women. Beta faggots cling to one woman like glue and cry when a man of a different race pulls an attractive woman from their race. If that's not insecurity then tell me what is.

Guess what? Someone being the same race as you doesn't make them your "territory" any more than someone with the same hair color, eye color or foot size. :crackup: :crackup:

YOU DON'T "OWN" THE PEOPLE OF YOUR RACE. So the point you're making is moot.

I disagree with the insecurity card, its a concept used for shaming purposes anytime the real point is unplesant.

Surely nobody "owns" anybody, we all agree in that but as history proved many times,anytime a community gets polluted from its base,it tends to collapse and any man deep down his instict knows it (while its completely unknown to women).

When I say polluted there is not moral or quality hidden meaning, I mean that a factor alien to such gets introdec till modifying the base.

I don't wanna start a political debate but not sure if you guys read the news recently about whats going on in Europe, you'll see that any community which lost a racial and cultural indentity is in deep sh1t, not referring onlyto sweden of course.

I strongly believe than men are born provided with a strong set of insticts which purpose is to avoid sh1tty outcome, you can agree or disagree its up to you but a phenomenon which exists everywhere is not something that can be linked to "insecurity".

Anyway I recognize you may have a point about the white men considering themselves at the top while considering the others below, but at the same time you have to realize that this doesnt happen only because of historical reasons but mostly because of feebback from women of any races themselves.

 

[Who Dares Win]

Jaylan I'm not sure why you bother debating.

How many times have any of the posters in this thread ever said, "you know what you were right there, I'm going to change my entire views on other races".




I will say this and leave. You are showing your confirmation bias in this statement. I have heard from several well adjusted white women I've dated that they prefer black guys. So my feedback would contradict your own.

In fact there is a study that argues black women are at the bottom of the hierarchy in terms of desirability or objective attractiveness due to greater levels of testosterone, muscle mass, thickness, more masculine features, etc but that black men are at the top due to this very same reason. See. I can play this game too.

S_L out.

Yeah but your considerations come from the mouth of women (which we all know how reliable are women words), other considerations come from dating sites search engine which if you allow me to say, is a much more stable fact.

Also as we all know, men are only visual while women although strongly visual have great consideration to a man status and not to be offensive to anyone but at least here in Europe black men are at the bottom, add to this the sheep mentality of the average female and you get your answer considering the amount of sh1t that is thrown at black men everyday.

So you have women which look less femminine and men which may look more masculine but lose a load of points in term of social proof and status.

Also this black men being more athletic than whites seems overhyped to me, while black guys surely are more mascular and strong than most of southern europeans they are not any better than slavic ones.

Man this is not about playing a game as you said, everybody here is saying what he believes to be true and tries to support it with some evidences, then its up on the reader to make his mind.

I see some good looking girls with black guys in here, not only the fat whales as someone said altought thats the standard, but those girls hardly are serious about it, some are just looking for something more interesting than their everyday normal guy or the arrogant lad on a motorbike, they dont take those guys home or to their friends.

Not saying it to bash or make fun of anyone, I've been that guy as well in some parts of eastern Europe where girls didnt want the local guys (potential husbands) to know that they were getting physicial with a foreigner...apparently even girls get what Im saying about the territory factor, they were probably afraid that no man of their own would have get them after being taken from an outsider.

Me personally Im not gonna annoy anyone for his dating habits wheter men or woman, but at the same time Im not gonna forget anything my gut says just because someone may be offended.

No flame intended to anyone of course.

 

[PlayHer Man]

I see some good looking girls with black guys in here, not only the fat whales as someone said altought thats the standard, but those girls hardly are serious about it, some are just looking for something more interesting than their everyday normal guy or the arrogant lad on a motorbike, they dont take those guys home or to their friends.

Not saying it to bash or make fun of anyone, I've been that guy as well in some parts of eastern Europe where girls didnt want the local guys (potential husbands) to know that they were getting physicial with a foreigner...apparently even girls get what Im saying about the territory factor, they were probably afraid that no man of their own would have get them after being taken from an outsider.

The stuff highlighted in red is key.

In the end its all about perspective. Ultimately.. from a sexual stand point... women generally find black males very attractive. From a status stand point... not so much.

But in 2013 its really not all that flattering to be the guy she wants to take home. All that really says is you are a "safe and reliable" BETA FAGGOT she can control.

Black males are on the same level as bad boys with tattoos who snort coke. Women don't take them home to their parents. Women find them sexy and want the experience. Its part of their c0ck carousel adventures. Then once they are older, used up and past their prime.. they look to settle down with a "socially acceptable" beta faggot.

Some white males pride themselves on being the socially acceptable beta faggot over the sexy bad boy. Good for them. However, I don't see it as all that flattering. :kick:

With marriage being pointless in 2013.. what's the point of "going home to meet her parents"? What is the end goal there?

 

[Who Dares Win]

The stuff highlighted in red is key.

In the end its all about perspective. Ultimately.. from a sexual stand point... women generally find black males very attractive. From a status stand point... not so much.

But in 2013 its really not all that flattering to be the guy she wants to take home. All that really says is you are a "safe and reliable" BETA FAGGOT she can control.

Black males are on the same level as bad boys with tattoos who snort coke. Women don't take them home to their parents. Women find them sexy and want the experience. Its part of their c0ck carousel adventures. Then once they are older, used up and past their prime.. they look to settle down with a "socially acceptable" beta faggot.

Some white males pride themselves on being the socially acceptable beta faggot over the sexy bad boy. Good for them. However, I don't see it as all that flattering. :kick:

With marriage being pointless in 2013.. what's the point of "going home to meet her parents"? What is the end goal there?

Man you can rationalize the way you want and if calling peole fagg0t makes you feel better do it, but what you say kinda reminds me fat women saying that men cant handle a strong woman or western european fatties calling eastern european girls "b1tches" cause they get all the men...then they go in creative explanation such a yours with a little bit of truth and a little bit of shaming.

Not sure who was before talking about white guys to be bvtthurt if they lose their priority on white women, but if name calling is a sign of being bvtthurt Im sure they are not the only ones.

Agree on the being taken home is not an achievement, but being introduced to intimate friends surely is.

 

[PlayHer Man]

Man you can rationalize the way you want and if calling peole fagg0t makes you feel better do it, but what you say kinda reminds me fat women saying that men cant handle a strong woman or western european fatties calling eastern european girls "b1tches" cause they get all the men...then they go in creative explanation such a yours with a little bit of truth and a little bit of shaming.

Not sure who was before talking about white guys to be bvtthurt if they lose their priority on white women, but if name calling is a sign of being bvtthurt Im sure they are not the only ones.

There is no shaming going on. If my statements hurt your feelings then that's a personal problem.

I simply state the truth. I don't care who is offended by it.

Modern women ride the c0ck carousel when they're young and attractive. This issue is not really debatable. They go for the bad boys in their youth and look for a passive beta faggot they can control when they hit late 20's early 30's and fear missing their window to settle down. This is the simple truth.

Whether you choose to accept the truth about women or ignore it really has no baring on reality.

Agree on the being taken home is not an achievement, but being introduced to intimate friends surely is.

There is no "achievement" with women. Women are for sex, fun and reproduction. Only men who pedestalize women see anything they get from women as an "achievement". :crackup: :crackup:

 

[PlayHer Man]

Refresh your memories guys. The things I post are not NEW information:

Post from 2005 --> http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=83349

I know this is a "Red pill" site, but based on reading the majority of the material here, I would say this site has a few TRUE red pillers and many more between blue and red. Purple pill? :crackup:

For your own good many of you need to wise up. Women care little how you feel about their dating choices unless they want to keep you around. In which case they just LIE. They care more what other women think. Bad boy for private fun in the shadows and beta to "show off" to the world. Its that simple.

 

[( . )( . )]

Bad boy for private fun in the shadows and beta to "show off" to the world[/B]. Its that simple.

I've never met a woman in my life who wanted to show off a beta. Government provided wealth transfer, feral hypergamy and thoughts of alpha c@ck she's missing out on allows one to literally see glimpses of visceral contempt women hold for betas if you take the time to observe these interactions.

Women settle for herbs sure, but they sure as hell are not with them because the alternative is a "dark taboo" who she cannot be seen with if that's what your implying. There are no social stigmas or ramifications for women anymore. As a matter of fact the past 4 or 5 decades of the MSM trying it's hardest to force down women's throats how great interracial mixing is still not really sticking. What you see and who's banging her on the side (presuming she's a 5+) is how it is, and what she wants.

 

[Who Dares Win]

There is no shaming going on. If my statements hurt your feelings then that's a personal problem.

I simply state the truth. I don't care who is offended by it.

Modern women ride the c0ck carousel when they're young and attractive. This issue is not really debatable. They go for the bad boys in their youth and look for a passive beta faggot they can control when they hit late 20's early 30's and fear missing their window to settle down. This is the simple truth.

Whether you choose to accept the truth about women or ignore it really has no baring on reality.




There is no "achievement" with women. Women are for sex, fun and reproduction. Only men who pedestalize women see anything they get from women as an "achievement". :crackup: :crackup:

We all know the c0ck carousel thing and the beta provider taken later, but you imply that that black guys do the fvcking and whimpy white ones do the marrying, sorry to tell you but the discrimination started from most white women starts much earlier.

Also as boob man reminded you, women dont need providers anymore, if they bring a guy to their friends now its because the guy is at least decent, 45yr old women dont get betas they just stay by themselves if they didnt married while young, the provider model is outdated.


It reminds me that black guy who said that white women love black men so much and thats why interracial porns are so common...as if those movies were not created for black men and some white with a cuckold fantasy.

Anyway no offence taken from you as much as I hope you didnt get any from me, as I said many time I think anyone deserves at least a shot as much as anyone has the right to chose with who being associated and who avoid, while nobody has the right to complain because he has not being invited in the cool people club or whater it seems.

 

[PlayHer Man]

I've never met a woman in my life who wanted to show off a beta. Government provided wealth transfer, feral hypergamy and thoughts of alpha c@ck she's missing out on allows one to literally see glimpses of visceral contempt women hold for betas if you take the time to observe these interactions.

Women settle for herbs sure, but they sure as hell are not with them because the alternative is a "dark taboo" who she cannot be seen with if that's what your implying. There are no social stigmas or ramifications for women anymore. As a matter of fact the past 4 or 5 decades of the MSM trying it's hardest to force down women's throats how great interracial mixing is still not really sticking. What you see and who's banging her on the side (presuming she's a 5+) is how it is, and what she wants.

What I highlighted in RED above is key. No women wants to show off a man who is not high status. However, what makes a woman's vagina tingle and what makes a man a high status are not the same thing. One great example is the Boston Terrorist and many men in jail who get love letters.

There are loads of beta faggots who have high status. Some are rich, some are celebrities, come are athletes, etc. But they are mentally beta faggots and this is why many of them end up divorced and cleaned out down the road.

Beta is more a mindset than anything else bro. What makes a woman's vagina tingle is not necessarily who she wants to date or have kids with. When settling down, women consider more factors than just "I want to f*ck him". One of my friends from high school who is basically a loser working in fast food was f*cking a HB8 while she was engaged to a "higher status man".

Keep in mind that the overwhelming majority of men of ALL races are beta faggots. So if most women only have beta faggots to choose from.. of course they will pick the ones with the most money and the highest social status when possible. And that's all it is.

Regarding your claim that "there are no social stigmas for women anymore" that's not true. Sure.. there are no social stigmas enforced by law or by men. HOWEVER there's still a d!ck measuring contest among women where social status matters a lot. The good-looking rich white guy is still supreme as far as being the "right guy" to be with long-term.

Alphas of ANY race will attract women sexually more than betas of ANY race.

We all know the c0ck carousel thing and the beta provider taken later, but you imply that that black guys do the fvcking and whimpy white ones do the marrying, sorry to tell you but the discrimination started from most white women starts much earlier.

Also as boob man reminded you, women dont need providers anymore, if they bring a guy to their friends now its because the guy is at least decent, 45yr old women dont get betas they just stay by themselves if they didnt married while young, the provider model is outdated.


It reminds me that black guy who said that white women love black men so much and thats why interracial porns are so common...as if those movies were not created for black men and some white with a cuckold fantasy.

Anyway no offence taken from you as much as I hope you didnt get any from me, as I said many time I think anyone deserves at least a shot as much as anyone has the right to chose with who being associated and who avoid, while nobody has the right to complain because he has not being invited in the cool people club or whater it seems.

The idea that people even care which race of man white women are most attracted to shows how deeply ingrained the pedestalization of women is. :crackup: :crackup:

If what you took from my statements is: "Black guys do the f*cking and white guys do the marrying". Then you've got it wrong.

I said --> Alphas / bad boys do the f*cking and beta faggots do the marrying. The only racial point I was making was that white guys who are bothered by attractive white women f*cking black guys are beta faggots.

I also said that black guys are often part of a woman's c0ck carousel adventures. Not necessarily because they are "alpha" or "bad boys" but because they are perceived that way and women want the sexual experience.

Again you bring up this up --> "women dont need providers anymore, if they bring a guy to their friends now its because the guy is at least decent"

He is at least "decent"? Why would it matter if he is decent or not unless marriage is the goal? You are making the point that women want to get serious with decent men. I made the point that getting serious with women in 2013 is pointless. So where are we going with this? :crackup:

Alphas spin plates for life. George Clooney has it right.

 

[Who Dares Win]

The idea that people even care which race of man white women are most attracted to shows how deeply ingrained the pedestalization of women is. :crackup: :crackup:

If what you took from my statements is: "Black guys do the f*cking and white guys do the marrying". Then you've got it wrong.

I said --> Alphas / bad boys do the f*cking and beta faggots do the marrying. The only racial point I was making was that white guys who are bothered by attractive white women f*cking black guys are beta faggots.

I also said that black guys are often part of a woman's c0ck carousel adventures. Not necessarily because they are "alpha" or "bad boys" but because they are perceived that way and women want the sexual experience.

Again you bring up this up --> "women dont need providers anymore, if they bring a guy to their friends now its because the guy is at least decent"

He is at least "decent"? Why would it matter if he is decent or not unless marriage is the goal? You are making the point that women want to get serious with decent men. I made the point that getting serious with women in 2013 is pointless. So where are we going with this? :crackup:

Alphas spin plates for life. George Clooney has it right.

You have the right to think what you want when it comes of white guys being pissed off if some non white bang white women but I still support the territory theory which works for white guys/white women as much as black guys/black women and so on, if you pay attention I didnt call "beta fagg0ts" those indians which were concerned about me getting indian girls, I believe that its perfectly sane for any man with healthy tests to be possessive toward women which belong to his group.

But again you're free to think whatever you want since hardly any scientist nowaday will give a sure explanation, considering also that science is often under the gun of politics when it comes of such things.

Btw by "decent" I mean anyone which would not ruin your reputation if you are associate with, which again (no offence) but its the case of most white women and black men.

I remind you again that Im european so I talk about the reality that I know well, except the PC countries in northern Europe a local woman which is seen attending black men gets a stigma and can forget to be considered anything more than pump and dump from most men, wheter they are togheter or just hooking up.

Its like if she is screaming that she is fvcking up with her own tribe so those who consider themselves part of such no longer extend protection to her.
Hope my point is clear, it may sound something racist (what is not according to today standards?) but thats exactly how it works.

Anyway agree on the alpha spin plates for life, its a very sad thing but its the most clever one nowaday.

 

[PlayHer Man]

You have the right to think what you want when it comes of white guys being pissed off if some non white bang white women but I still support the territory theory which works for white guys/white women as much as black guys/black women and so on, if you pay attention I didnt call "beta fagg0ts" those indians which were concerned about me getting indian girls, I believe that its perfectly sane for any man with healthy tests to be possessive toward women which belong to his group.

But again you're free to think whatever you want since hardly any scientist nowaday will give a sure explanation, considering also that science is often under the gun of politics when it comes of such things.

Btw by "decent" I mean anyone which would not ruin your reputation if you are associate with, which again (no offence) but its the case of most white women and black men.

I remind you again that Im european so I talk about the reality that I know well, except the PC countries in northern Europe a local woman which is seen attending black men gets a stigma and can forget to be considered anything more than pump and dump from most men, wheter they are togheter or just hooking up.

Its like if she is screaming that she is fvcking up with her own tribe so those who consider themselves part of such no longer extend protection to her.
Hope my point is clear, it may sound something racist (what is not according to today standards?) but thats exactly how it works.

Anyway agree on the alpha spin plates for life, its a very sad thing but its the most clever one nowaday.

It seems we are in total agreement so why do you say "You can believe what you want".

If you read back I made the following statements:

-The majority of men are beta faggots
-Men who are threatened by what other men can get are beta faggots

So it seems it makes sense for the majority of men to feel butthurt when an attractive woman of their race gets with a non-member. It seems we agree doesn't it? Why are we having this back and forth unless you are trying to justify being a beta faggot which it seems you are trying to do :crackup: :crackup:

Also.. if a white woman who gets with a black man is instantly considered "low quality" then why even feel threatened by it? If this woman is unworthy of you why would you give a sh*t who she is with?

When you pay attention it all adds up. It boils down to three things:

1. Racism
2. Entitlement
3. Insecurity

When I say those words I get accused of "shaming". However, I'm just calling a spade a spade. Anyone who feels shamed by such words needs to stop being racist, entitled and insecure. Otherwise, they should take the label like a man and just admit they are indeed racist, entitled and insecure.

AGAIN FOR THE RECORD:

Men who are threatened by what other men can get are beta faggots. The only situation where this does not apply is in a committed relationship. But when it comes to women you are not involved with.. it makes you a beta faggot to feel threatened. I see no logical argument against that claim... so I'll assume we agree here.

 

[Jaylan]

^epic post was epic

 

[( . )( . )]

Also.. if a white woman who gets with a black man is instantly considered "low quality" then why even feel threatened by it? If this woman is unworthy of you why would you give a sh*t who she is with?

Pointing out the glaringly obvious penchant for walmart chicks doesn't always equal feelings of "threat". Makes as much sense as saying one has stomach pains because the skies blue.

I can only speak for myself here but I do it for the lolz plus I know it pisses off gaylan and that other angry faggot who's obsessed with (not getting any) white chicks. Hustalz or whatever his name is. The stench of anti-white sentiment is all over those 2 losers like sh!t on a blanket. I figure some reality is the least I can give back. Think of it as a good deed for the day.

 

[Jaylan]

^You show hostility for the lulz? Riiiiight.

Let me say it again, why do you care who a woman screws? Especially if you dont want her, why care? Also, you need to stop pretending that non-white guys only get "walmart chicks". Seems like pathetically wishful thinking on your part.

And if you are doing all this for the lulz, it shows how truly weak you are as a man. What loser goes around hating on others for who they decide to sleep with, just because he needs to have a chuckle? Are you 12? Damn kid, grow up. But I commend you for admitting that you like to focus on who other men fvck so you can troll them like a juvenile.

Quit making excuses for your butthurt insecure racism.

lol @ you calling someone anti-white because they call you out on your own bs racism. Last I checked you are the one who has an issue with how people decide to date racially. I dont give a damn who people date.

Want some reality? The reality is that you dont make me mad. You make me laugh. I laugh at guys who are too filled with cowardice to dare say anything to me in public about who Im dating. I laugh at internet losers who are clearly the same guys who get all jealous when I walk around with hot chicks of various races when Im out and about. Stay jealous kid.

Keep being a beta loser whos so concerned with where I put my d!ck. It doesnt get sadder than that. It seems that 11 years on this message board has taught you nothing about being a man. You sure have a knack for being a jealous troll though

 

[( . )( . )]

Want some reality? The reality is that you dont make me mad.

Heh, look at all that sh!t ^^. For someone who's not mad you sure do a good impression whenever I post. You sure your not mad just a little?