ketostix said:
This is a bunch of crap. Either women are naturally and normally not likely to oprgasm during sex, and if not it's their fault. Maybe they need to put down their vibrators or learn how to be better lovers themselves. You cannot just claim most men are terrible lovers and to blame. You could a better case that women are terrible lovers.
It's simple mathematics keto. Men require much less time and energy to be satisfied than women, so naturally this will lead to a lot of guys passed out in their own drool and more women staring at the ceiling, wondering when they will actually feel something.
The truth is that most guys I know (especially younger ones) are really more concerned with getting their rocks off than satisfying a woman. A lot of times it is not intentional and based solely on ignorance. No one hands you a manual on the female body.. you have to take the initiative to explore and learn yourself.
Women don't need a manual for our bodies because we are simple creatures. Pull, thrust, repeat is pretty much all they need to know and most of us are happy campers, blissfully ignorant that a woman needs much more than that.
Overall your responses show me that you don't have too many women around you, because if you did you would hear them complain about just how bad most men are in bed.
You make it sound like it's a curse to be female.
Both genders have their blessings and curses. Neither one lives on Easy Street. Sometimes it's helpful to understand the challenges each of us faces in order to resonate with people. After all, if there is one thing both sexes crave more than anything, it's to be
understood
You ever stop and think that maybe women are naturally happy with their ability to become pregnant? I mean yeah you can reasonably conclude that women have a factually bigger biological stake in sex, but I don't think women are too worried about it.
Never said they were unhappy, just subconsciously influenced by their biological clocks.
If they did they would all go for the guy that has oneitis for them and who would give his arm and leg to stay and be with them, but they never do.
Precisely because their FEELINGS wont let them. Such a spineless chump is an instant turn-off. A woman's emotional drive is stronger than anything else.. it's the basis by which she legitimizes everything she does.
She doesn't want to mate with a guy who is willing to give up his whole life for her. He has to have a lot going on for himself WITHOUT HER, in order to draw her in to begin with.
Actually men have a bigger stake in a woman getting pregnant, child support, no say in matters of abortion and child custody, etc.
You could argue that men have a potentially bigger
financial stake in it (depending on what country you live in), but you can't deny that women have more biology and emotions attached to it. They are the ones that actually give birth and it's no secret that they link sex to feelings more than we do.
Granted the emotional aspect is changing as men become more feminine, but overall we still have the natural talent to disassociate ourselves from sex, treating it more like a physical release, than an act of pure intimacy.
Well the rest of your post could've been written by a feminist, so I won't bother with it.
Do you even know what a feminist is, or is that just a word you use to describe people who don't agree with your views on life? To clue you in a bit..a Feminist would never suggest that sexually liberated women are really prisoners of their own devices.
I got hope for you keto.. you are obviously smart and well-spoken, but you seriously need to drop this penchant of yours to argue aimlessly with your emotions. I dunno if you get this a lot, but you remind me of my ex-GF by the way you love to bicker.
You want to disagree, that's cool. But please bring something better to the table than "That's BS" or the same tired "Men are victims" stance you try to peddle all the time. Those of us with balls are not buying what you're selling.
