STR8UP said:
My last LTR was awesome in this sense. I couldn't get enough of that tight little asian ass, and me getting into it got HER into it and we fed off of each other's sexual energy.
It was great because she had only been with one guy before me, so I had the opportunity to open a few doors for her.
Hehe.. you gotta be careful sometimes don't you? Women's sexuality is like Pandora's box in a lot of ways and it can really surprise you.
One of the first asian chicks I dated was a lot like yours - very reserved and almost prudish in bed. By the time I was done with her she was doing all kinds of nastiness and eventually her levels of debauchery surpassed mine and I had to let her go!
I ran into her years later only to discover she had become a call girl
Jitterbug said:
The women from my mother's generation and older are vastly superior to what we have now, in terms of feminine qualities. We have a lot more gold-diggers now than we've ever had in the past, thanks to the "Family" Court and their female bias.
I'd agree that quality across the board was better, because nature is happy with men in a dominant position. Unfortunately we took it too far and are now suffering the consequences.
I'd never trust a female to be fair.
Women are indeed at a disadvantage here. Fairness requires one to think rationally and that's never been their strong suit, especially in situations where emotions run high. It takes a woman of exceptionally strong character to be completely objective. But that doesn't mean that they don't exist.
In short, you are wise to be wary, but be careful with the word "never". It has a funny way of biting you in the ass.
In my experience the majority of both sexes tend to be conniving selfish f*cks who would use your head as a stepping stone to get what they want and not think twice about it. In essence, no gender has a patent on integrity.
For example, have you ever seen women collectively tackle the glass *floor* in the workforce, to have more women become garbage collectors, toilet cleaners etc.? Or they're only talking about the glass ceiling?
That's just wishful thinking. All the toilet scrubbers in every place I have worked have been women. Look at the glass ceiling and see who is really playing the field on that level. It's one giant boy's club, and though the occasional dragon-lady gets her foot in the door, for the most part this has not changed. Men still make a LOT more money than women, in practically every field. We also hold more political power in just about every department. That's the reality of the situation.
The women of previous generations who didn't have the economic advantages had great incentives to improve themselves and bring more to the table. That's how human beings work best. Just like in a company, the employees wouldn't work any harder if they couldn't get any reward for their efforts. That's why communism failed in practice, but sounds great in theory.
Agreed. Though I don't think that economic dependence is really the answer. Women just need to be rewarded more for doing womanly things.. and for many years they have been taken for granted and treated as second-class citizens. Women are passive by nature so you have to understand just how much oppression it takes for them to get organized and pissed off enough to rise up.
While the men of yesterday may have been more in tune with their masculine nature, they were obviously doing SOMETHING wrong if women just couldn't take it anymore. Chicks did not all collectively wake up one morning and decide to ruin our lives. Treating them like slaves just did not work out, and treating them as goddesses is proving even more disastrous.. it's time to admit it and just move on.
Communism failed because it is an extreme ideology. Capitalism is slowly rotting society from the inside out and Feminism is already proving to be a massive failure on so many levels. Extremes are not healthy for anyone! The path to a better world is BALANCE.
ketostix said:
I think you're taking the women don't lead thing too far. Women do lead but they do so covertly, and usually a little more indirectly and impliciitly and subtly than men do.
You ever see that movie "My Big Fat Greek Wedding"? There is one line in there that makes so much sense. The mother is explaining the dynamics of her marriage to her daughter and says "Men are the head of the household, but women are the NECK" In other words, the man has the final say and calls all the shots.. but the woman knows exactly how to steer and influence his decisions.
The problem we have today stems from the fact that most women want to be the head now, and that's just not how things work. Men must call the shots!
The main thing is women are poor leaders, and not so much for the manner that they lead but because they have poor judgement and no sense of fairness etc. But the point is women can and do lead, they believe they are entitled to it now-it's the law now basically. They have to agree to be submissive. It's like a juvenile deliquent whose incorrigible. I'm not saying that men aren't responsible for women acting as leaders, or that there's nothing to be gained by a man asserting leadership, but there's limits. The horse has gotten out of the barn.
I think this is all happening because we are not taking our roles as leaders far enough though. The idea that "women can lead" is a Trojan horse.. just like women can be firemen and bodybuilders. Hey look at all this freedom, isn't it great? But don't even think of pointing out that men are better suited for certain jobs and women also have their strengths cause that would imply inequality! What's even more unfair about this is that even if you rightfully point out where a woman is doing a lousy job, it gets twisted into an ethical debate. All of a sudden equal rights = special treatment and we find ourselves in a heap of horse-sh!t. Apparently, this is one of the few things we strongly agree on.
See, you label, "Angry". I'm not angry.
Naw, this just earns you the label of "a tad defensive". I wasn't talking about you at all, I was referring to your readers. To read about how unfair the game is should make them angry and hopefully spur them to action. Wasn't that your intention? To spread awareness?
This is an example of you creating a strawman. I've never said that women will always have the upper hand. What I said is, why they have an advantage is because they have equal or greater economic footing due to preferential treatment. If they continue to be given preferential treatment, then naturally they're going to continue to have an advantage. On the flipside, how is saying things that sound good but aren't really true championing men? Being blind to things and deception is just where any feminist wants men to be.
Actually your first argument was that women have all the advantages because they have a pvssy. I then went on to show you how this is both a blessing and a curse to them, because sex is not really what they are after. You never responded to those points and went on and on about how unfair the system is.. and I even agreed with you on certain points. My biggest gripe was your choice of a title.
The real reason why females will always be at an advantage
Is that not the same as saying they will always have the upper hand?
It should have been called
Society's bias towards women or something like that, but whatever.
You then went on to challenge us to point out where men have ANY advantages whatsoever, further compounding your weak frame. I posted a long list and you didn't respond to single one of those points (all true and based on FACT), opting to call me a blind macho-man instead. It's pretty easy to see who's got leftover straw on their shirt here.
Honestly, I got nothing against you keto. Where we don't see eye-to-eye can be summed up right here:
Is something negative or is it realistic and pragmatic?
The textbook definition of pragmatism is
A practical, matter-of-fact way of approaching or assessing situations or of solving problems.
You got the assessment part down pat. Pointing out how empty the glass is comes very easily to you. But I see very little material from you on actually solving problems in a practical manner. While I applaud your efforts to raise consciousness, I wonder what kind of personal success you enjoy because you don't share SOLUTIONS, only PROBLEMS.
I think it was Rollo who recently defined pragmatism as "Hoping for the best and preparing for the worst". I can echo that sentiment.
Where are the keto posts loaded with practical advice and the slightest shred of optimism? I'm dead serious man. Point me to some of these because lately all I see from you are rants, despair and arguments which are honestly not helpful to guys who come here already feeling down about their situation.
In short, what makes you a Master DJ, aside from your post count?
