Black women for white guys

[drixsa]

puhhhhlease

this thread is so stupid.

what do you want to hear "black men are superior"?

trying to compare what races are more alpha or more Dj is like trying to compare the effiency of different #2 pencils (hey its the 1st thing on the desk i saw)

 

[NMMWCR]

There is politically incorrect research going on about biological, innate racial differences. It is usually not done in this country b/c it can support racist beliefs and thus cannot get funding.


Just curious, what does this research have to say about the sistas?

 

[TheInfamousCBear]

Originally posted by Devestator

The findings are that, in all countries, black men have more testosterone and are more aggressive and muscular. They also tend to be better athletes in most sports. This also makes them overreprented in the criminal population. But they are better "DJs" for that reason. In other words, they tend to be more "alpha" as defined by Playa Supreme.

Thats what I was trying to say, and Ive seen this from real life experience...Thats why Player Supreme said being alpha isnt always good, matter of fact it might get you into trouble... If you dont belive it, go outside and observe, and then you will see, as fukked up as it might be...

 

[Devestator]

"Just curious, what does this research have to say about the sistas?"

Sistas tend to have larger breasts, hips, and butts than whites and asians. You probably already knew that. The reason for racial differences in both genders is all about increasing fecundity, that is, blacks are adapted to be more reproductive. Whites and asians, having moved out of africa and into colder climates, are adapted to produce less children. They evolved to be more cautious and reserved than blacks to deal with the inhospitable environment.

Whites and asians also evolved to produce fewer children and invest more resources into each. This is because survival rates in the north were less than in Africa. (I know this is not true today.)

Therefore: white/asians = marriageable (to RAISE children) = AFC; blacks = ****able (to PRODUCE children) = DJ ("alpha").

But that also means that whites and asians tend to be too analytical and too careful for dj purposes. Blacks tend to act with less deliberation. This is an average, though.

Not all scientists accept this theory and many reject it for non-political reasons. They mention how similar all races are genetically and many reject the notion of race altogether. Take this with a grain of salt as I have.

 

[Who is John Galt?]

Response

KNOW you just didn't refer to Asian women (YOUR OWN KIND) as "inferior".

I absolutely did not. No Asian-American ethnic group constitutes more than 1% of the population. Therefore, if you want to only marry a woman of “your own group” you are writing off over 99% of women. Hence, in virtually all cases, you will wind up with an inferior woman than you would if you looked at the entire female pool.

"Asian" is a spurious group like "Hispanic." How is a woman of Chinese descent "my kind" more than a woman of Swedish or Cuban descent?

. Ask any person if they'd rather be with a white/black/brown/yellow person who is comfortable in their own skin, or some wannabe that is desperately trying to sever all his/her ties from their ancestral identity. And to top it off, you are ONE FOCKING generation removed from your parent's home nation. Give me a break - you act like you're a 15th generation Asian-American. I'll bet that your parents speak their native tongue at home, and keep in regular contact with their relatives in the mother country. You guys probably even go to local ethnic eateries that remind them of their homeland, and even watch some Asian television programming from time to time. There are things all around you that remind you of who you are, but you're trying your darndest to push it out of your mind. It's a WASTE OF TIME, banana-boy. It flows through your veins, and it written all over your golden-hued skin, in your black hair.

I simply see no point in preserving ancient customs that I do not—and never did—care about. Explain why they are so important. Since I have no link to my ethnicity I do not care about my ethnicity much, although I realize it affects people’s perception of me.

BTW, I am a South Asian.

Black Americans embrace both their American nationality and their African heritage (even though it isn't pin-pointable to one African nation). So why can't an American with parents from Asia do the same?

They can but I simply do not see the point of it. If you feel better celebrating your “heritage” feel free to do so—but remember that when you are discriminated against by someone else who is proud of their “heritage.”

You'll never be white, so if you're not Asian, then what the hell are you?

I am an individual.

By the way John - how do you picture me in person?

I do not picture you in any way. I know too little about you to form an opinion about how you look and act in real life.

Do you want to know my view on religion?

 

[iqqi]

who is who is john galt?

 

[jakethasnake]

Re: Response

Originally posted by Who is John Galt?
I absolutely did not. No Asian-American ethnic group constitutes more than 1% of the population. Therefore, if you want to only marry a woman of “your own group” you are writing off over 99% of women. Hence, in virtually all cases, you will wind up with an inferior woman than you would if you looked at the entire female pool.

"Asian" is a spurious group like "Hispanic." How is a woman of Chinese descent "my kind" more than a woman of Swedish or Cuban descent?




I simply see no point in preserving ancient customs that I do not—and never did—care about. Explain why they are so important. Since I have no link to my ethnicity I do not care about my ethnicity much, although I realize it affects people’s perception of me.

BTW, I am a South Asian.



They can but I simply do not see the point of it. If you feel better celebrating your “heritage” feel free to do so—but remember that when you are discriminated against by someone else who is proud of their “heritage.”



I am an individual.



I do not picture you in any way. I know too little about you to form an opinion about how you look and act in real life.

Do you want to know my view on religion?

John, I'm an individual too. So is your neighbor, and the bum who hangs out by your local 7-11. You're boring me with more of this ultra-liberal drivel.

 

[jakethasnake]

John, I feel the need to apologize to you for calling you a banana. I thought you were East Asian, and I was mistaken. -- you're a focken 'Oreo', is what. Like, an Asian-Indian version of an Oreo.


Also, I find it hilarious that you're such a hardcore oreo since you belong to one of the most ethnocentric and clannish groups in the world - Indians rival the Chinese any day of the week. This is an exercise in tragi-comedy. LOL!

 

[iqqi]

not only do i think you two (JTS and WIJG) are the same person, but i want to know why you two keep smiling so much while you are arguing. that is ssoosoososo stereotypical, damn toothy cheesing asianfolk!

 

[jakethasnake]

Originally posted by iqqi
not only do i think you two (JTS and WIJG) are the same person, but i want to know why you two keep smiling so much while you are arguing. that is ssoosoososo stereotypical, damn toothy cheesing asianfolk!

Well, you're certainly doing your part in adding to the smiles.

 

[iqqi]

Originally posted by jakethasnake
Well, you're certainly doing your part in adding to the smiles.

hell if ya can't beat em, join em!

it is kinda like in the gangsta flicks where everyone is smiling and laughing knowing full well that someone is about to get shot.

 

[Who is John Galt?]

Oreo?

You're boring me with more of this ultra-liberal drivel.

Really, I simply cannot see the point of preserving a handful of ancient customs. Why do you place so much importance on them?

Like, an Asian-Indian version of an Oreo.

How? How am I white?

I find it hilarious that you're such a hardcore oreo since you belong to one of the most ethnocentric and clannish groups in the world - Indians rival the Chinese any day of the week.

Too bad Indians and other South Asians failed to learn a lesson about tribalism after 9/11. Perhaps after discrimination skyrockets against them in the event of another terrorist attack they'll see how much it is hurting them and change their ways.

ut i want to know why you two keep smiling so much while you are arguing. QUOTE]

Some people enjoy arguing.

 

[KINGKONG]

Re: Oreo?

Originally posted by Who is John Galt?


Really, I simply cannot see the point of preserving a handful of ancient customs. Why do you place so much importance on them?



How? How am I white?



Too bad Indians and other South Asians failed to learn a lesson about tribalism after 9/11. Perhaps after discrimination skyrockets against them in the event of another terrorist attack they'll see how much it is hurting them and change their ways.

ut i want to know why you two keep smiling so much while you are arguing. QUOTE]

Some people enjoy arguing.

Where did you get your facts? It looks like you got your facts backwards. Go to U.S cencus website and see for yourself. More than 60% of AF married AM in 2002 in United States. According to the U.S cencus that 95% people in america marry their own racial ethnic group. Blacks marry blacks, Asians with asians, Hispanics with hispanics and WHITES with WHITES. Don't judge the whole race by some random chicks you see in the streets. I'm a white male who feel strong compelling impulse to date or reproduce with someone from another race. Now, i am not being racist or anything, i am just being honest. This may comes shock to some, but people are naturally attracted to people who share their physical characteristics.

 

[Who is John Galt?]

Originally posted by Devestator
There is politically incorrect research going on about biological, innate racial differences. It is usually not done in this country b/c it can support racist beliefs and thus cannot get funding.

The findings are that, in all countries, black men have more testosterone and are more aggressive and muscular. They also tend to be better athletes in most sports. This also makes them overreprented in the criminal population. But they are better "DJs" for that reason. In other words, they tend to be more "alpha" as defined by Playa Supreme.

The book "Race, Evolution, and Behavior" outlines these differences. Amazon has it.

Do you have any links about this? If we looked at any "racial" or ethnic group we would find physical differences. However, have they found any significant differences with respect to intelligence or important behavior? Are they objective or are they neo-Nazi's with a political bias disguised as scientists?

 

[Who is John Galt?]

Kingkong

Originally posted by KINGKONG
Where did you get your facts? It looks like you got your facts backwards. Go to U.S cencus website and see for yourself. More than 60% of AF married AM in 2002 in United States. According to the U.S cencus that 95% people in america marry their own racial ethnic group.

More than 60% of AF married AM in 2002. What about the remaining 40%? Now compare that to the share of BM with WW.

95% of people marry within their "racial group." That is true. However, large parts of this nation are not diverse. It is clear that there are more intraracial relationships than interracial relationships but the national rate is misleading.

This may comes shock to some, but people are naturally attracted to people who share their physical characteristics.

If that was the case why were interracial marriages outlawed?

People do prefer "their own." "Their own" may be an ethnic group or a racial group. That preference is cultural, not innate.

What ethnicity are you? For instance, if you are Danish would you be less attracted to a Greek or Italian woman? Is it physicial characteristics or just skin color?

I'm a white male who feel strong compelling impulse to date or reproduce with someone from another race.

Typo?

Anyway, why do you feel the way you do?

BTW, "honesty" can be racist. Hitler was honest about his beliefs on race (he did NOT lump all Europeans into one racial group) and ethnicity but that does not change the fact that he was a bigot.

 

[learningtopimp]

OK dude as another fellow South Asian I have to add my 2 cents.

First of all, you do have some valid points. I've dated white girls Latina girls, and funny enough never an Indian girl. And I see some of your points....I love Indian girls also and I may marry one not sure, but I still will date other races. Tell me how your experiences going after other girls have been...I'd be curious to know?

But as for the 9/11 thing, I agree we need to be less "tribalisitc" but to claim this as the reason for discrimination is completely ridiculous. Has every group that's been discriminated against been "tribalistic?" African-Americans have been discriminated against even when they made extra efforts to integrate into American society, bending over backwards to a lot of white people in the 40's, 50's and 60's when most other groups would have wanted to just fight and kill. Many of the Japanese Americans taken to internment camps in WWII had white friends, Asian friends (this is a fact I'll give you the history book that discusses it) yet they were still locked away. What this goes back to is that we look different from other people and so we are easy targets. If you are black, Asian, Latino, Arab anything other than white, this can happen. In the past, it happened to whites as well (Italians, Irish) but due to intermixing it doesn't anymore. Our cliquishness is an issue, BUT I hardly think that's the main reason for discrimination. And at the school I go to, UCLA, it's not just one group that is cliquish. Go to a frat house, it's almost all white guys. Go hangout in some spots, it's all Koreans, or Filipinos. Same thing applies with Latinos and with blacks as well. We SHOULD move beyond it. But the reality is that most people, South Asians included, have not.

And Jake, I generally agree with you but I think you would agree Koreans are quite cliquish as well, at least here in LA? I should know, I grew up in Palos Verdes with tons of Koreans. Had lots of Korean homies but Koreans can be as cliquish as anyone else I've seen, amongst Asians at least. But it's all good.

 

[Who is John Galt?]

learningtopimp

In the past, it happened to whites as well (Italians, Irish) but due to intermixing it doesn't anymore. Our cliquishness is an issue, BUT I hardly think that's the main reason for discrimination.

I agree. It does hurt them, though. Arranged marriages--a result of tribalism--will severaly damage South Asians since they are dramatically reducing intermixing which will retard the assimilation process for them. I believe "we" should follow the example of the Irish, Italians, Germans, et al. Eventually it will happen but I see no point in retarding the process.

 

[Engetsu]

This is one crazy bible-worthy thread... To be put under "pointless historical debates".

 

[jakethasnake]

Just curious - and I'm not mocking you anymore - how are your racial politics (assimilate at all costs) serving you in your interactions with people in everyday life? I have some comial scenarios in my head, but of course I'll wait for you to answer.


I think that your answer may also depend on your geographic location since attitudes vary from place to place, if you don't mind divulging that information.

 

[MetalFortress]

Pfft, this is crazy. I'm proud that I am half Eastern European and look 100% Eastern Euro (except for blue eyes), but I'm not going to go bomb others or discriminate against others who aren't Eastern Euro. You need to learn the difference between pride and racism, Galt.

In terms of women, race doesn't matter to me. If I like her, I like her and if I don't, I don't.

In terms of racial mixing, *shrugs* if it's going to happen, okay, if it doesn't, okay. Cultures come, cultures go. There can be a California culture, Texas culture, New York etc. Hell, in many cases there already are. I, a SoCalian who lives in what is practically Neo-Mexico, and someone living in Montana or North Dakota or something, would likely experience at least a minor form of culture shock venturing into each other's world.