Who is John Galt?
Don Juan
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2003
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 0
Response
The 1990 census revealed that among married people twenty-five to thirty-four years old in 1990, 70 percent of Asian women and 39 percent of Hispanic women (but only two percent of black women0 had white husbands.
Approximately 1/6 of black males have white wives. Now, I want all those people that assail blacks for that to respond to the much higher rate of white male preference for Asian and Hispanic women. In the minds of you simpletons does that mean they want to be Asian or Hispanic? Does that mean they feel they are inferior? Does that mean they hate their "culture"?
Your explanation is very simplistic. America is a very large nation. Many parts of this nation are not diverse. In diverse areas intermarriage is very high, and races are melting away just like
European ethnicities did in the middle of the 20th century. For instnace, out of four marriages in California today is interracial.
Again, it is extremely simplistic to expect groups to "melt away" overnight. It took well over half a century before European immigrant groups started to "melt away". Racial segregation and racist immigration policy ended only in the mid 1960's. Asians and Hispanics have started to "melt away" and African-Americans will start to melt away at a significant rate in a decade or two. By the time the white share of the population dips below 50% race will be as irrelevant as ethnicity is today among white Americans.
I'd like to go back to an absurd comment you made earlier.
I am not merely just disagreeing with you as well. I find condescending ignoramuses who arrogantly believe they are know-it-alls very annoying.
Newsflash: there are people who actually believe in absurd "facts" such as that. Plenty of white racists claim that an astronomical number of non-white males are marrying "their" women. That is why I asked "The Edge" for a source. I would be willing to wager that his source is a racist one...(his comment about black males going after FAT white chicks is a telltale sign of white racists when it comes to discussing this subject).That '7 out of 10' comment was SARCASM, in direct reference to your shoddy theory. LOL... can't believe you missed that.
I am Asian. It is simplistic to assume that anyone who disagrees with you ona racial issue is a white male.And you're only thinking about this from a White man's perspective (naturally).
That is false. Apparently you are very ignorant on this subject. Perhaps you should do your homework and then comment on it.The rate of outmarriage for Asian women is high because a large proportion of women older than 40 are war brides, or wives of men who brought them over to America from Asia... This certainly skews the ratio of Asian female-white male relationships to Asian male-white female ones
The 1990 census revealed that among married people twenty-five to thirty-four years old in 1990, 70 percent of Asian women and 39 percent of Hispanic women (but only two percent of black women0 had white husbands.
Approximately 1/6 of black males have white wives. Now, I want all those people that assail blacks for that to respond to the much higher rate of white male preference for Asian and Hispanic women. In the minds of you simpletons does that mean they want to be Asian or Hispanic? Does that mean they feel they are inferior? Does that mean they hate their "culture"?
You really have no clue. A study by the Population Research Center, in Portland, Oregon, projects that the black intermarriage rate will climb dramatically in this century, to a point at which 37 percent of African-Americans will claim mixed ancestry by 2100. By then more than 40 percent of Asian-Americans will be mixed. Most remarkable, however, by century's end the number of Latinos claiming mixed ancestry will be more than two times the number claiming a single background.And MOST IMPORTANTLY, if what you said were true you would see a gradual "whitening" of every minority group in this country over subsequent generations. This has obviously not happened - in part due to still-existing segreation and mistrust, and also because of the polarization of Americans into various hyphenated entities, i.e. Korean American, Bahaminian-American, Polish American, Ecuadorian-American, etc. (though we do tend to simplify this into 'color categories' i.e. 'black', 'white', 'Asian', 'Hispanic', etc.) - this tends to breed a certain degree of insularity amongst the groups, with less resultant mixing.
Your explanation is very simplistic. America is a very large nation. Many parts of this nation are not diverse. In diverse areas intermarriage is very high, and races are melting away just like
European ethnicities did in the middle of the 20th century. For instnace, out of four marriages in California today is interracial.
Again, it is extremely simplistic to expect groups to "melt away" overnight. It took well over half a century before European immigrant groups started to "melt away". Racial segregation and racist immigration policy ended only in the mid 1960's. Asians and Hispanics have started to "melt away" and African-Americans will start to melt away at a significant rate in a decade or two. By the time the white share of the population dips below 50% race will be as irrelevant as ethnicity is today among white Americans.
I'd like to go back to an absurd comment you made earlier.
It is narrow-minded to assume that everyone blindly adheres to an irrational worship of their "identity" and their "culture." I am Asian; my parents are immigrants. I have absolutely no connection with the culture of their nation of origin. It is absolutely outrageous for simepltons to assume that I am betraying "my culture" or "my group" simply because I am dating a woman of a different ethnicity or "race". Newsflash: Many people have no links to their culture and could not care less about it. We seek the hottest babe we can find and do not believe in absurd quotas which will result in us finding an inferior mate to preserve a handful of nonsense customs invented centuries ago.. You have to take into consideration an individuals comfort with his own identity, and his determination to preserve his culture.
Then you must be very disturbed about yourself.I find the tendency of people to make amateurish generalizations quite disturbing.
I am not merely just disagreeing with you as well. I find condescending ignoramuses who arrogantly believe they are know-it-alls very annoying.
Last edited: