Balling a married woman

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Originally posted by white sox bill
Let me go sit on my boulder and think about that one!

Just consider what could be possible if you could just take control of your own life, nothing else but the choices you make daily that sets the direction of your life.

 

[white sox bill]

Originally posted by Francisco d'Anconia
Just consider what could be possible if you could just take control of your own life, nothing else but the choices you make daily that sets the direction of your life.

Agreed--you will either suceed in a spetacular way or fail miserably.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Either way, hopefully something is learned from each experience.

 

[Bonhomme]

just had to comment

I couldn't help but chuckle at a post entitled "balling a married woman" by someone with such a screen name as "sensible juan."

Actually, one would have more to fear from an abusive boyfriend than a meek husband.

But one who is a reasonably skilled mack can have plenty of action with unattached women or women that are about to ditch their current BF. So why bother with all the complications?

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

But what if they come after you? They want to be with you and by your terms PLUS no strings attached? Trust me, it happens.

 

[Bonhomme]

Certainly makes it easier

But what if they come after you? They want to be with you and by your terms PLUS no strings attached? Trust me, it happens.

That certainly cuts the likelihood of complications down. But why would such a gal even tell you she's married???

If it's a gal who is in an open marriage, then I'd be likely to just trot on over to the hardware store, get some industrial strength condoms, and have at it.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Re: Certainly makes it easier

Originally posted by Bonhomme
That certainly cuts the likelihood of complications down. But why would such a gal even tell you she's married???

Because it's the "right thing to say." On more than one occasion the woman I was talking to told me she was married. I don't pursue married women so when we finish our conversation, I wish them a good life and prepare to go on my way. They hesitate a moment and before I get out of sight they are calling my name asking if they could see me again.

Women enjoy my company because I don't go after them but I still make them feel good about themselves. It's attractive for them to pursue a guy again, it makes them feel special; in control of their own lives for once. So they pursue me. It's happened before, it'll happen again. Sometimes I let them catch me, sometimes I don't; it just depends.

 

[white sox bill]

God I feel like such a hypocrite--As a sideline I do personal training @ a gym. Last November this 37 yr old, married 11 yrs w/2 kids started training w/me. Soon she starts telling me her sex life is the pitts, she flirts w/me, she calls me @ home, gave me 3 photos of herself.

Part of me says ram it to her, the other says she has hubby,kids etc. She may be just flirting though..I'd hate to make a move on that and get called out! Wouldn't look to good w/my job either! Whats a DJ to do?

 

[Royal Elite]

Its just this simple, the class-less do you, those with class do you.

As long as there are people with class who regulate their own behavior there are those with no class who dont.

There will be those who feel like kings and that they deserve only the best and wont want a too bit adulteress and those who feel like peasants and will take whatever scrappings life throws.

Do You but be prepared for whatever consequence comes with it.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Originally posted by Royal Elite
Its just this simple, the class-less do you, those with class do you.

As long as there are people with class who regulate their own behavior there are those with no class who dont.

There will be those who feel like kings and that they deserve only the best and wont want a too bit adulteress and those who feel like peasants and will take whatever scrappings life throws.

Do You but be prepared for whatever consequence comes with it.

Yeah, it's just like people who are self righteous and judgmental. It's not enough that they have a different opinion about things, they have to put others down that don't agree with them.

These are probably the guys that women cheat on because the guy probably puts them down for whatever differences they have. But hey, he probably tricked her into marrying him and she easily sees other guys that are better and less judgmental so it's obvious why she's attracted to other guys.

Too bad so many guys can easily get the girl but have no idea how to keep her. Well, that's the consequence that comes with taking her for granted because he married her...

 

[BobbDobbs]

Marriages are difficult to get out of finacially and/or if you have kids. Therefore many people stay in marriages for reasons other than commitment to the person they are married to.

It isn't just because they are mooching off the other party. In many cases they have a lot more invested financially, and stand to lose half of it or worse -- maintanance/ alimony. Plus breaking up the kids.

Couples will stay together just so the kids don't have a broken family.

Not all marriages are June and Ward Cleaver.

Since we are guys talking about married women, think of it as letting them out of their gilded cage once in a while.

The same is true of married guys -- but that discussion should be posted on a female dating forum.

 

[Royal Elite]

Not too many classless dirty people will actually say Im a classless dirty person. They will always make excuses for whatever vile behavior they exhibit.

There is no logic in the world that can justify wrong, or no logic in the world that condamn right. You are either wrong or right, there is no in between.

Stop making excuses for whatever path you choose. If you dont mind messing with women that are taking then do that, but dont try to justify it.

You can say whatever you want but unless you are a pimp, or swinger, you will not openly allow your wife or gf to screw other men, therefore you dont think it is right.

People look for social acceptance to help fend off their conscious. Karma exist, whether you agree with it or not. Do whatever you want the world to return to your face, because it will.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Originally posted by Royal Elite
People look for social acceptance to help fend off their conscious. Karma exist, whether you agree with it or not. Do whatever you want the world to return to your face, because it will.

And the boogie man will get'cha if you don't watch out...

 

[BobbDobbs]

Originally posted by Royal Elite
There is no logic in the world that can justify wrong, or no logic in the world that condamn right. You are either wrong or right, there is no in between.

Actually, if you want to dwell in the domain of logic, you'd have to define your premises, state your axioms.

In this regard, the first issue would be the logical status of marriage. Is it something that is axiomatically apparent? A scan of world culture shows some significant variance. For instance in many cultures/religions men can have multiple wives -- polygamy. Or cultures where women have different male partners -- polyandry.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Originally posted by BobbDobbs
Actually, if you want to dwell in the domain of logic, you'd have to define your premises, state your axioms.

In this regard, the first issue would be the logical status of marriage. Is it something that is axiomatically apparent? A scan of world culture shows some significant variance. For instance in many cultures/religions men can have multiple wives -- polygamy. Or cultures where women have different male partners -- polyandry.

So is it safe to assume that there are people that will say that it is wrong even in these circumstances since everything is either 'wrong' or 'right?'

 

[BobbDobbs]

Originally posted by Francisco d'Anconia
So is it safe to assume that there are people that will say that it is wrong even in these circumstances since everything is either 'wrong' or 'right?'

I presume they would. But it isn't an issue of their consistency in saying so. It is an issue of what they can logically justify -- since the original poster brought up logic.

He said, "There is no logic in the world that can justify wrong, or no logic in the world that condamn right."

Given that there are various religions and cultures that have different dogma on the allowed number of sex partners, I was wondering if the poster had any suggestions on which particular religion, if any, had arrived at the correct LOGICAL answer to the question of what is right and wrong in regard to sex and dating.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Originally posted by BobbDobbs
I presume they would. But it isn't an issue of their consistency in saying so. It is an issue of what they can logically justify -- since the original poster brought up logic.

He said, "There is no logic in the world that can justify wrong, or no logic in the world that condamn right."

Given that there are various religions and cultures that have different dogma on the allowed number of sex partners, I was wondering if the poster had any suggestions on which particular religion, if any, had arrived at the correct LOGICAL answer to the question of what is right and wrong in regard to sex and dating.

Bumping. Wondering if anyone cared to answer BD's question.

 

[Lost In Translation]

I am the man that would kill you for touching my wife

i am the 0.01%

FROM THE BIBLE :

Proverbs 6

32 Whoever commits adultery with a woman lacks understanding.

He who does so destroys his own soul.

33 Wounds and dishonour he will get.

And his reproach will not be wiped away.

34 For jealousy is a husband's fury;

Therefore he will not spare in the day of vengeance.

35 He will accept no recompense,

Nor will he be appeased though you give many gifts.


Francisco d'Anconia you are right. We live in an age where men are not men. In ages gone by you WOULD BE AFRAID. Husbands in the old days would kill or maim you.

You are also lucky that men today have no f*cking idea the nature of these wh0res in 2005. 90% of them are not women. as PR_L says they are wh0res.

i would catch on. i would catch you. i would kill you.

but i would not marry a wh0re. so i guess you can breathe easy.


Lost In Translation

**AUSTRALIAN STREET PIMP**

 

[nzalan]

You spout religious babble from the bible, as if you are a religious man, and yet you say you would kill, which goes against one of the commandments - thou shalt not kill.

Like many others who claim they are religious, you are a hypocrite. You are religious only when it suits you.

 

[white sox bill]

Originally posted by Lost In Translation
I am the man that would kill you for touching my wife

i am the 0.01%

FROM THE BIBLE :

Proverbs 6

32 Whoever commits adultery with a woman lacks understanding.

He who does so destroys his own soul.

33 Wounds and dishonour he will get.

And his reproach will not be wiped away.

34 For jealousy is a husband's fury;

Therefore he will not spare in the day of vengeance.

35 He will accept no recompense,

Nor will he be appeased though you give many gifts.


Francisco d'Anconia you are right. We live in an age where men are not men. In ages gone by you WOULD BE AFRAID. Husbands in the old days would kill or maim you.

You are also lucky that men today have no f*cking idea the nature of these wh0res in 2005. 90% of them are not women. as PR_L says they are wh0res.

i would catch on. i would catch you. i would kill you.

but i would not marry a wh0re. so i guess you can breathe easy.


Lost In Translation

**AUSTRALIAN STREET PIMP**

Yes Lost I can understand your rage if your wife ever cheated on you. I would feel the same, but I doubt most men (like 99.9%) would actually kill another man. I suppose 70 years in prison would have something to do with that. NO woman is worth that price. I'd just let the other guy have the ho. Peace