Danger said:
Ok, that clears it up a lot more. I agree with everything you said.
I believe it is very possible that the woman will not cheat on you...However
I recognize that women vary in many levels, one of those includes "capability of cheating". Some women are just much more capable of cheating, branch-swinging, etc,... than other women are.
It is a sliding scale.
Some women will do it every chance they get,
some once a year,
some once a decade,
some once in a lifetime
and some once in 500 years should they live that long.
My point is, EVERY woman is capable of cheating.....they just all need different prerequisites to do so. The woman that cheats on her husband (or boyfriend), by her actions, immediately puts her in the questionable area of this scale.
Sure she may not cheat on you, but make no mistakes....the likelihood is much higher for her than it is for other women. I'd still chuck her afterwards.
Though i agree with this post, I dont agree with all women have varying degree's to cheat. I believe 'every' women has the potential to cheat.
Rather then a sliding scale of the women, I simply judge that all women regardless cheat, the step therefore is to choose a women who is compatible and to make sure the man doesn't slip up when dating her.
Yes you can date a ho', she is going to cheat, after all she is a ho' but that to me is not the womens fault that is the fault of the guy for putting a ring on her finger, a ho, is a ho! But saying that even the so called 'good girls' will have a high chance of getting wet for the other guys if the man turns into a spinless doormat. We see those types of threads daily on this forum.
I am under no illusion that men have to be a certain way to keep his women from straying, if a guy for example sits on his backcrack and watches TV all day or plays WoW none stop, i'd encourage the women to stray anyway, that is the difference, it doesn't mean for one second she is going to cheat on the guy she has branch swung to, unless she is a ho! And I'd like to think an educated man can tell a ho! anyway.
But saying that I personnally wouldn't date a girl with a history of cheating, i'd ignore one or two blips, but anymore then that, I'd think she was a certified ho, or has extreamly bad taste in men anyway.
Married or single it's all the same to me, I'm also aware of the high % of AFC's out there who put a ring on a womens finger to stop her doing certain things, one of them is cheating, they feel that sticking a ring on a womens finger is the magic formula to prevent her from cheating, some even go further and get her knocked up, in the hope she wont slut it about. These AFC's are to blame for being spineless, fear-based losers and I have little sympathy if they find out that their manipuation isn't quite working has they expected. Any examples are guys, who put little into maintaining the relationship and instead act out of fear of loosing a chick, even though red flags are evident and not neccassarily red flags revolving around her cheating or the potential to. A good % of AFC's will stick a ring on a womens finger even though the match is a poor match and the women has many red flags, just because they feel they cant get another women or are too blind/stupid/ignorant to see the wood for the trees.
I know many examples of the above and come across those types of scenarios almost daily in the real world, from guys with GF who are simply appauling and they stick with them, to married men, emasculated puss&'s, blaming themselves for their wifes or GF poor behaviour, which more often then not is largly to do with the man being such a fuc*ing limp wristed puss* anyway.